Preview

Marc Antony & Martin Luther King Comparison Contrast

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
791 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marc Antony & Martin Luther King Comparison Contrast
Anthony Vottima

K. Hewitt

ENG IV: Pd. 4

9 November 2008

The similarities that bind together Marc Antony’s Friends, Romans, and Countrymen speech and Martin Luther King’s Letter from Birmingham Jail are unreal; seemingly orchestrated. King’s letter is written upon a structure of a strong pathological appeal combined with a powerful use of repetition and moving language. Likewise, Antony’s speech demonstrates an emotion appeal with a firm directing address to his audience and a sinewy use of verbal irony. The strong use of pathos, repetition, and a few other various rhetorical devices come together to assert Mark Antony’s funeral speech and Martin Luther King Jr.’s Letter from Birmingham Jail as two public addresses of great similarity. Pathos appeal dominantly takes the upper hand in terms of similarities throughout the two proclamations. For example, both King and Antony open to their audiences with a friendly standing. Antony calls upon “Friends, Romans, [and] Countrymen” (III.ii.75.), and King addresses, “My Dear Fellow Clergymen” (King, Jr.). In doing so, they both associate themselves as one in the general public. The friendly approach, however, doesn’t last long either of the speeches. Shortly into his announcement, Antony breaks his seemingly neutral stance in saying “When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept;” (III.ii.93.). This attributes a vulnerable and human characteristic to Caesar’s personality. On the other hand, King takes upon a much more outright and vivid description in which to do so. He explains his reason to why he cannot “wait” for justice to take play in the unfair separation of whites and blacks is because he has seen “vicious mobs lynch mothers and fathers at will and drown sisters and brothers and whim;” (King, Jr.). Obviously, this would cause quite a stir of emotion to his reader. The use of this compelling strategy helps the composers to build not only sadness in the minds of their audiences, but also

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Letter from Birmingham Jail” is written to the audience of clergymen. Martin Luther King Jr., wrote this letter to respond to clergymen who had questions for him. Paragraphs 12-14 are the most persuasive and thorough. King uses many rhetoric mechanism and appeals. Throughout those paragraphs, there is an excessive use of: pathos, logos, ethos, metaphors, symbolism, direct addressment and parallel structure.…

    • 68 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Martin Luther King’s “Letter from a Birmingham Jail”, he uses an authoritative voice in his analogies, allusions, and ethical appeals that make his argument more relatable and compelling. In comparison, his authorial counterpart lacks the same confidence in his stylistic devices and ethical appeals making his argument weak and less…

    • 52 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr.'s letter from Birmingham Jail was written on April 16, 1963 while he was incarcerated in the Birmingham City Jail. This letter addresses the criticism that a group of white men had thrown at him and his pro-black American organization about their non-violent actions against racial discrimination and injustice among black Americans in Birmingham. He notes that he doesn’t usually respond to letters of criticism but he thought that they were “good willed people and their criticism was sincerely set forth.” King writes this letter to defend his organization's actions. King's letter talks about…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Written by Martin Luther King Jr., the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” is a paragon of persuasive writing that takes advantage of ethos, pathos, and logos in order to convince its readers to take MLK’s side during the American civil rights movement. The use of ethos defines MLK as a credible writer; the use of pathos appeals to his audience on a personal level; and the use of logos layers his arguments and claims with irrefutable reasoning and logic. By using all three techniques, MLK is able to hold the attention of his readers and persuade them to take his side in the battle against segregation.…

    • 1184 Words
    • 34 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In regards to two influential and criticized men, Dr. M. L. King and Edward Said, both wrote two grand literary pieces. To address their audiences, both writers use effective persuasive techniques. Such as King for example, uses analogies, parallelism, and to reiterate. Said on the other hand uses rhetorical questions, cause and effect, and narration. Similarly, both King and Said are addressing two nuance audiences that are in similar cavalier situations.…

    • 71 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” was written in April 1963, during the African Americans fight for equality. Martin Luther King Jr.’s claim was not just to reply to the eight clergyman who had called his demonstrations “untimely and unwise”, but also aim his justifications at a bigger audience of religious and secular beliefs. An audience that is black and white; therefore King is able to justify his reasons and tactics of beginning immediate action using nonviolent protest to everyone. Throughout his letter Martin Luther King Jr. demonstrates the use of ethos, pathos, and logos to help support his claim while also consistently referring…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was an American Baptist minister, activist, humanist, and a leader in the African-American Civil Rights Movement. With MLK being such a strong leader for Civil Rights he had several speeches to give, each written with a different purpose but the same goal. MLK’s Letter from Birmingham Jail was written in response to those that accused him of being an extremist. Throughout his letter MLK used various forms of allusion, anaphora, and pathos in order to get his point across to the people that accused him of being an extremist and to the clergymen that called him unwise and untimely.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King’s Letter from Birmingham Jail is one of the most well known documents in American history. King’s profound ability to articulate important ideas, values, concepts and Biblical perspectives made for some of the most powerful and inspirational pieces of American literature ever produced. One technique that King used in his public speeches and letters was his allusions to historical figures, the Bible and opposing congressmen. During the 60’s when cultural prejudice still held strong roots in Congress, it was King’s talent to inspire the public that revolutionized America’s racial injustices. King’s frequent use of allusions in his famous Letter from Birmingham Jail proved his intelligence and greatly attributed to his success and popularity during the 1960’s. His allusions demonstrated his referential capabilities while also making his messages readily relatable to the public.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Spring of 1963, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. led about a thousand African-Americans through non-violent protests in the business district in Birmingham. Unfortunately, he and other top activists were thrown into jail by Birmingham police in retaliation and were treated under harsh conditions, as did all African-Americans. On the day of his arrest, the Birmingham, Alabama newspaper published The Public Statement by Eight Alabama Clergymen called King’s activities “unwise and untimely,” calling for the community to renounce protest tactics that caused unrest in the community, to do so in court and “not in the streets.” King wrote back from jail arguing each point the clergymen wrote in their “public statement”. In the Letter from Birmingham Jail, King writes point by point his reasons for coming to Birmingham and the actions he had committed and why he wishes to continue his fight for equality. King successfully employed the use of Logos, Pathos, and Ethos by arguing back on legal, historical, and political grounds.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On April 16th, 1963, during the peak of the Civil Rights movement, Martin Luther King Jr. wrote to a collection of clergymen in regards to his beliefs and protests. In his “Letter From Birmingham Jail,” King aptly wrote to the clergymen about their concerns in a respectful manner, while maintaining his dignity and explaining his purpose. In order to validate his points, he first built his credibility, and from there flowed into a plethora of other strategies. His emotional anecdotes and insight are strong points in his letter, appealing to the clergymen’s sense of compassion and justice. The imagery that accompanies his writing creates vivid and horrifying scenes meant to encourage the reader to join King in his civil rights endeavors. Logically, King presents his values in a manner that becomes inarguable against, which furthers the persuasive value of his writing. His…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After Caesars death Antony requested to speak at his funeral. Antony was a very good friend of Caesar. In his eulogy, Antony denies accusations of Caesar being “too ambitious” and retorts with examples of how good of a man he really was in his eyes. Antony firmly believes Caesar was innocent and that his murder cannot be justified. He speaks to the Plebeians, the Roman people…

    • 369 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Initially, Antony uses Ethos to establish himself as a trusted and loyal figure to gain respect and trust of the plebeians. To gain the citizens’ attention, Antony begins Caesar’s funeral speech by reassuring them that he only “[came] to bury Caesar, not [to praise] him” (3.2.83). By only intending to bury Caesar, Antony convinces the audience to listen to his words because they are spoken with bitterness toward Caesar. With Antony in agreement with their newly instilled anger, the plebeians begin to trust Antony’s words even though his bitterness was not…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus used discouragement to keep citizens of Roma from arguing against him, but Antony did show true devotion for Caesar and grief for his death. "I weep for him...who is here so rude that would not be a Roman...so vile that will not love his country?"(128: III: ii) Brutus talks about weeping over Caesar's death without any tears, then dissuaded the crowd so they would not admit that Caesar did not deserve to die. "...My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, and I must pause till it come back to me (weeps)"(134: III: ii) Antony actually had to stop and cry because of his overwhelming anguish, influencing he crowd to feel empathy, knowing how it feels to lose someone very close. Brutus used deceit for pathos and Antony used heartache, which is obviously more…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “No needle is sharp at both ends.” This is a famous Chinese proverb meaning that if people decide to do something, it is neither always good for everyone nor the best idea. People usually choose the end where that is beneficial to most people. In addition, if the needle is sharp at both ends, it will hurt either way you go. A leader is like a needle; guiding people towards either one of the sides. Martin Luther King Jr. and Socrates were both great leaders because they fearlessly dedicated their lives to their countrymen each had a unique vision. Though they lived in different time periods, King, a man who fought against segregation, and Socrates, one of the founders of Western philosophy, had many similarities; their power and influence.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both speeches are very reluctant and have a persuasive passion about each topic. Moreover, Brutus's speech is more eloquent than Antony's speech considering it talks about Caesar's honor and his wisdom. Both essays start off with "Romans, countrymen..." (III.ii.13) (III.ii.72) Antony's speech talks more about burying Caesar, instead of praising him like Brutus's speech. Which is why Brutus's speech is more persuasive than Antony's speech because Brutus talks about only great things about Caesar and uplifts his spirit, unlike Antony who downgrades on…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays