Preview

Marcus Tullius Cicero's Speech In The Roman Senate

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
546 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marcus Tullius Cicero's Speech In The Roman Senate
Marcus Tullius Cicero’s quote from his speech in the Roman Senate, speaks to the topic of traitors. Cicero’s purpose was to persuade his audience about the insidious characteristics of disloyalty and treason. Cicero’s claims regarding his opinions on treason and enemies are defendable. Cicero employs a number of methods to achieve his purpose. His use of attributing human qualities to an object or abstraction and creating images through his detailed words provided by his statement about evil expands on achieving his message in his speech in the Roman Senate in 58 B.C. Cicero begins by saying, “A nation can survive its fools and even the ambitious.
But it cannot survive treason from within.” In his opening, Cicero expresses that we can live with people who
…show more content…
It provides audiences an image, for example, of a spy. In the case that on one side they may completely be viewed and act like they are on equal terms with the “good.” However, they are actually against the “good” and are working for the “bad” or “evil” and, as stated previously, are “undermin[ing],” an “enemy,” and a “traitor.” How Cicero relates each scenario of a traitor back with any of the key words creates a story of how “the traitor appears not a traitor” and how the traitor “speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments.” This depicts how a traitor, when within a group, acts and pretends to be the same as everyone else and on their side. Meanwhile, they are really just obtaining information so in the end they can “stab them in the back” and use what they said against them and bring it back to the evil/enemies. In conclusion, the central image embedded in this quote made by Roman Statesman, Philosopher, and Orator, Marcus Tullius Cicero (106-43 B.C.) is evil and how it moves freely. Cicero wants his audience to understand that not everyone is loyal to a nation and that some are here to knock down a nation, even if it is done

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    6. To which event in act 4 of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar does this statement refer?…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Soon after the last breaths of one of Rome’s most popular general, Julius Caesar, Antony and Brutus were speaking in front of the people of Rome. Both cunning leaders were nimble in the art of persuasion and manipulation. The beloved leaders used the Ethos, Pathos, and Logos methods of persuasion to sway the crowd to his respective view of the actions of the night and their former general Julius Caesar.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    stating that “honor is the subject of my story” (I, ii, 92). Cassius begins his speech by…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    59 BC - to Atticus on his way to Epirus (Rome, Jun/Jul): discussion of the political situation, and gerneral discontent with the Triumvirate - 'anxious suspense', 'everyone groans at the political situation', 'muzzled', 'oppression'; fear of a dictatorship - 'free for much longer'; discontent with how he's acted, lessening auctoritas…

    • 1422 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cicero’s prosecution of Verres was motivated by desire for power, ethics, and personal duty. Cicero clearly viewed prosecuting Verres as his path to political success for Cicero claimed, “If you want power, there is a time when you have to seize it. This is my time.” When Terentia asked Cicero how he intended to accomplish this goal, he coolly responded, “By prosecuting Gaius Verres for extortion.” (Harris 66). Furthermore, Cicero’s impeccable ethics played a role in his desire to prosecute Verres, for Verres was unequivocally guilty and had killed people. Similarly, there is a recurring motif of Cicero not defending those he found incredibly guilty (particularly of violence), such as when he refused to defend Catiline on the grounds, that Catiline was “so obviously…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears!” (Reference to other speech) I, Marc Anthony, Caesar’s right hand man have come to you today to speak about a problem facing the community of Rome. Sadly, Caesar, our glorious leader, has gone up to the gods. In result of this we need a new leader before our city descends into chaos and destruction. I can help to return peace and overflowing prosperity to the city of Rome and Italy. As you all know Caesar died prematurely to the bloody hands of conspirators who have infiltrated what we call home. I saw Caesar die at the hands of such traitors, so these conspirators must be killed in vengeance. Without these conspirators stopped, our beloved city will be unable to continue on its gracious path.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Vengeance is a powerful. Caesar’s slaying by Brutus sets Antony in motion to deceive his murderers into allowing him to speak to Rome. In his speech to the Romans, Antony turns Rome against Brutus using repetition to convey the irony in his own speech and discredit Brutus, as well as, applying meter to add emphasis to the mutiny, and contrast Brutus’s speech allowing him to connect with his countrymen.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Decius Brutus and Mark Antony, both Roman Senators, eulogize Julius Caesar, each using a different technique and approach. Brutus, in a somewhat arrogant, to the point, eulogy, attempts to sway the people. He justifies conspiring against Caesar by stating that Caesar's ambition would have hurt Rome. However, in Antony's eulogy, he focuses on Caesar's positive traits, and cunningly disproves Brutus' justification for killing Caesar. The fickle Romans waver between leaders, responding emotionally, rather than intellectually, to the orators.<br><br>Brutus seeks to explain why he conspired against Caesar. He begins his speech with "Romans, countrymen ...", appealing to their consciousness as citizens of Rome, who,…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marcus Tullius Cicero was born in 106 BC and died in 43 BC when, according to Plutarch, two men came to execute him. His last words to them were “There is nothing proper about what you are doing, soldier, but do try to kill me properly.” He was born to a wealthy family with connections in Rome, but no one in his family had previously been a senator, making him novus homo. However, through his brilliance as an orator and advocate in court cases he ran for consul at the minimum age for the office, as a novus homo and won the seat, it had been thirty years since any novus homo had reached the consulship.[1]…

    • 2226 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without any power, a society tends to become irrational, indecisive and flavorless. This ideal is portrayed in all scenes including plebeians, whether through direct or indirect characterization. The premiering scene portrayed Marullus and Flavius along the streets, scolding commoners for being hypocrites. “You blocks, you stones, you worse than senseless things!/O you hard hearts, you cruel men of Rome,/Knew you not Pompey?” (1.1.27-29) was proclaimed by Marullus, in protest of Caesars’ celebrations. This reveals that the common people of Rome are easily swayed, as they cheered for Caesar defeating his predecessor, after recently cheering for Pompey himself. An exquisite example of the citizens’ complacency comes from the Third Plebeian. He states,“The noble Brutus is ascended: silence” (3.2.14) but yet, after a short speech from Antony regarding the conspirators, he claims, “There’s not a nobler man in Rome than Antony”( 3.2.96). Furthermore, when attending to Caesar,“We are bless’d that Rome is rid of him”(3.2.48) stated the citizens, only to later say, “They were villains, murderers” (3.2.135) merely for doing the very “ridding” they praised! Complicity and irrationality are portrayed by the violent outburst, “Revenge!—About!—Seek!—Burn!/Fire!—Kill!—Slay! Let not a traitor live” (3.2.183-184) from the citizens, once Antony’s speech is…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before his speech begins, the whole crowd is going wild with overwhelming support for Brutus. Knowing this, Antony is quickly able to capture the attention of the people by saying, “For Brutus’ sake, I am beholding to you” (64). By starting off with saying that Brutus endorses whatever Antony is able to say, they are suddenly more curious to hear what he say and what exactly their beloved Brutus approves of. By saying this, Antony is able to borrow Brutus’ honest reputation and use it as his own. Towards the end of his speech, Antony borrows Caesar’s renewed ethos, once again merging voices and giving Antony even more credibility. He asks the audience, “Wherein hath Caesar thus deserved your love?” (234). Antony successfully borrows Caesar’s great reputation and increases his credibility for the people to trust him.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his second monologue, Cassius focuses on pathos and logos in order to appeal to his audience, Brutus, directly. Cassius smartly avoids further development of ethos in this monologue to make sure Brutus doesn’t think this is all personal for Cassius and deter him from the conspiracy. Therefore, as mentioned before, Cassius’ intent for his second monologue is to appeal to Brutus. He wants to raise Brutus to the same level as Caesar and make him see that he is just as important in I.ii.9-15. This makes Brutus feel good about himself, and successfully makes Cassius’ arguments against Caesar more personal to Brutus and slowly pulls him into the conspiracy. Cassius could’ve used anyone’s name in his explanation that the name is equal to Caesar, but the fact that he used Brutus’ name made his pathos much stronger and directed at the audience for greater persuasion. This is where Cassius strongly considers his audience and knows that by implementing them into the argument he will have a higher chance at success. When Cassius then shifts into appeal to logos, he explains that Caesar, one man, is taking up all the fame and glory of Rome when there is room for much more than just one single, not even god-like man (I.ii.18-25). He explains once again just like he did in the concluding sentence of his first paragraph that it does not make sense that one man receive all the power and “bear the palm alone” (I.ii.43) He dives into the values of his audience and the people of that time who valued democracy, equality and even a divvied up triumvirate of three leaders who ruled Rome simultaneously in a checks and balances sort of way to avoid absolute leadership like the one Caesar is holding. Brutus of course would agree that, yes, why should a single man rule when the people or Rome and its government is based on a triumvirate with democratic…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mark Antony's plan

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout his speech Antony calls the conspirators honorable men. He then says, "You [the crowd] all did love him once, not without cause. What cause withholds you then to mourn for him?" This question goes against Brutus by questioning his speech when he betrayed Caesar. Now the crowd is starting to turn against the conspirators and follow Antony.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    10th Grade Julius Caesar

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages

    he is most loyal to causes the entire population of Rome to riot. Brutus’ inability to not trust…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the story, Julius Caesar, two mean with two different beliefs come to the same crowd to share their story and to bring forth their cause. Both of their speeches brought passion and true conviction. Taking the crowd to all extremes, the favor was with Brutus, until Antony came to the podium. Antony's speech swayed the crowd in such a way, the crowd turns, into a mad, chanting to kill the conspirorators.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays