Preview

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
494 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay
1.Why do Octavius and Mark Antony want to engage in a battle with Brutus and Cassius?

to avenge Caesar’s death to recruit new soldiers to their army to become friends with the conspirators to gain control over the land

The __________ between Cassius and Brutus was obvious as they struggled to overcome the obstacles in their friendship.

friendship tension resolution tone CASSIUS:
Their shadows seem
A canopy most fatal, under which
Our army lies ready to give up the ghost1.

. Die; the belief that a person’s spirit is released at death.

6. To which event in act 4 of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar does this statement refer?

Brutus being visited by Caesar’s ghost 
Caesar being crowned king the soothsayer’s omen
Calpurnia’s dream
…show more content…

Which type of language is used in this excerpt?

connotative meaning definitive language denotative language figurative language

CASSIUS:
[To Antony]
[Y]our words, they rob the Hybla bees,
And leave them honeyless.

What is the meaning of the figurative language used in this excerpt?

Mark Antony is sweet and kind with his words.
Mark Antony steals honey and gives it back to the bees without them knowing. X
Mark Antony manipulates people without them knowing.
Mark Antony is like a bee that makes honey for Rome.

When Brutus describes Mark Antony using the word “threat,” the __________ meaning implies that Brutus does not think highly of Mark Antony.

Figurative X connotative denotative dictionary ANTONY:
Villains, . . .
You showed your teeth like apes, and fawned like hounds,
And bowed like bondmen, kissing Caesar’s feet,
Whilst damnèd Casca, like a cur, behind
Struck Caesar on the neck.

Which type of language does Shakespeare use in the bolded lines?

denotation X definition figurative language foreshadowing What is Shakespeare’s purpose behind the war of words between Mark Antony and Octavius and Brutus and Cassius at the start of act 5 of The Tragedy of Julius


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The Roman's godlike worship of Caesar threatens the prominence of the Senate. To retain his dominance Mark Antony chooses to become a close ally to him. Cassius, Brutus, and the other conspirators however, plot Caesar’s demise. In the end, Mark Antony finds high esteem and the conspirators receive banishment and death. The play is an example, or maybe even a warning, that our actions and reactions have real effects. Brutus, Cassius, Casca, Cinna, Trebonius, and Cimber respond swiftly and without thought to Caesar’s rise and pay a heavy price for it in the end. Mark Antony sees the worth in being Caesar’s friend, and their friendship benefits him when Caesar is dead. In the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare the principal characters' initial reactions to Caesar’s rise affect their conclusive outcomes.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    23. Describe the views of Brutus and Cassius in regard to the plan to face Octavius, Antony, and Lepidus. Whose idea is accepted?…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How far will one man go to get revenge on the people who did him wrong? This question is relevant because Antony is ready to take action on the conspirators to make them pay for what they have done. By using his own emotions, that now has gotten him one step close to getting revenge. Antony was very tactful by studying the psychological aspect of the commoners to sway them on his side. Also, Antony figured out ways to persuade the crowd by using fallacies, rhetorical devices, and appeals.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Act 5 begins with Octavius and Antony saying that their hopes have come true because the men are fleeing the hills and coming to them. This says that Brutus is not truly in his right mind for strategy and is blinded by wanting be honorable after killing Caesar. Cassius then tells Brutus “Flatterers! Now, Brutus, thank yourself;/This tongue had not offended so today/If Cassius might have ruled.” (see lines 45-47), meaning that if had acted as Cassius suggested, then they would not be headed towards battle and may have lived. Also, Cassius reveals that he has seen ravens, crows, and kites flying over them, like vultures waiting for meat after the prey has been killed. After Cassius confession, Brutus says that should they lose the battle, he…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    7. What is revealed about Antony’s character when he says: “When Caesar says ‘Do this,’ it is performed.”…

    • 3419 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The leader of Rome is dead, and two men have completely different opinions as to what has happened to him. Brutus, his right hand man, says that he had to be killed due to his excessive ambition. While Antony states that he was brutally murdered by the people who called themselves his friends. But only one of the two stood out, they were so believable and convincing that it was hard to believe anyone other than him. And this speech was given by Antony. He gave an incredibly convincing speech, making the people of Rome completely look past the words of Brutus by sparking different emotions in them. But at the same time he was very careful and precise with his words which helped to protect him from the conspirators who murdered Caesar.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Mark Antony’s speech at Caesar’s funeral, despite all his protestations to the contrary, is fuelled by one purpose: vengeance to those who murdered his beloved Caesar. He uses combinations of verbal irony, repetitive diction, and heavy emphasis on emotions to sway his audience. He does so without guilt or remorse towards the people to whom the crowd will direct their wrath. Not only does he think of nothing but revenge, he convinces the crowd that he wants no harm to come to Caesar’s murderers.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Marc Antony makes a speech to the people of Rome after Brutus spoke out about killing Caesar with the conspirators. Through Marc Antony’s speech, Shakespeare uses language techniques such as irony, repetition/tone, and figurative language to illuminate conflict between the citizens of Rome and…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Decius Brutus and Mark Antony, both Roman Senators, eulogize Julius Caesar, each using a different technique and approach. Brutus, in a somewhat arrogant, to the point, eulogy, attempts to sway the people. He justifies conspiring against Caesar by stating that Caesar's ambition would have hurt Rome. However, in Antony's eulogy, he focuses on Caesar's positive traits, and cunningly disproves Brutus' justification for killing Caesar. The fickle Romans waver between leaders, responding emotionally, rather than intellectually, to the orators.<br><br>Brutus seeks to explain why he conspired against Caesar. He begins his speech with "Romans, countrymen ...", appealing to their consciousness as citizens of Rome, who,…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony loved Caesar and was completely against his murder, so he used rhetorical strategies to persuade the Romans to be against the perpetrators. For example when Antony says “Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man” he is using the mix of sarcasm and logos. Antony repeats this same thing over and over again until the Romans start questioning if Brutus truly is an honorable man. His sarcasm and repetition were both great rhetorical tactics that were used to manipulate and confuse the Roman’s minds. Antony brings together the perfect amount of ethos and pathos when he states, “ ‘Tis his will. Let but the commons hear this testament- which pardon me, I do not mean to read- And they would go and kiss dead Caesar’s wounds And dip their napkins in his sacred blood,” (III,ii,127-132). This is essential because it shows that Antony is credible and trustworthy because he has Caesar’s will. This also appeals to the people’s emotions because they become saddened over Caesar’s death. Antony used his tactics to make the Romans trust him and his views, which led to them rioting against the perpetrators. His use of ethos, pathos, and logos convinced the people that the assassination of Caesar was a cruel act and that Brutus, Cassius, and the other perpetrators are…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his speech during Caesar's funeral, Mark Antony tries to persuade the Plebeians that what the conspirators did to Caesar was not acceptable and something must be done, and this creates a critical and disappointed tone. During the beginning of Antony’s speech, he established his main ideas, and showed that he was different from Brutus. In fact, his first line, “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears”(3.2.82) tells a lot. Antony uses the word “friends” first, and this differs from Brutus because he said “Romans” first. This shows what Antony thinks is most important, which is friendship.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exposition of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare immediately presents the ideals that underpin the differing views of Caesar’s rising power through his two protagonists, Brutus and Cassius. Both characters posses different interpretations on Caesar’s reign on Rome, one being loyal to Rome and a love and respect for Caesar “I love him well” but the other being a spiteful and vitriolic towards a “feeble old tyrant.” This highlights the notion of Cassius’s selfish prejudice towards his own contentment, which is only shown behind closed doors. Brutus on the other hand is victim to Cassius’ vitriol and becomes the pawn as he is manipulated “poor Brutus, with himself at war,” Brutus is troubled emotionally, torn by his patriotism and his respect for Caesar, above all he has an undying love for Rome, “Brutus had rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” It is this love for Rome that causes such internal turmoil for Brutus, through Shakespeare’s use of juxtaposition of characters, he is able to highlight to the audience, the lengths that man will go to in order to…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Ceasar Leadership

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the play both men, Cassius and Mark Antony, show themselves caring for the citizens of Rome. Cassius claims to do this by killing Caesar; he claims that Caesar was ambitious and not right to be the leader of Rome. “But Brutus says he was ambitious, / And Brutus is an honorable man” (III.II.85-86). Cassius told Brutus that Caesar was ambitious and that’s why they needed to kill him, which is what Brutus says at the funeral. Here Mark Antony is speaking with a sarcastic tone because he does not believe that Caesar was ambitious, nor does he believe that Brutus is honorable. “I thrice presented him a kingly crown, / which he did thrice refuse. Was this ambition?” (III.II.95-96). Here Mark Antony is saying that if he was ambitious then he wouldn’t turn down the crown three times. In the way of caring for others Antony proves to be a better leader because he doesn't take extreme measures such as killing a man when he thinks things aren’t going the right way, as Cassius does. Mark Antony truly cares for the citizens of Rome, unlike Cassius who doesn’t regret his actions.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    honest" (III i 126). From this point, it is clear that Antony intends to flatter…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Complex Power Play

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The main power play in this text revolves around the concept of politics and is seen between Antony and Caesar throughout the first act of this play. From the very beginning we are given no illusion as to the nature of the relationship which exists between the two with the first sentence we hear…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays