Preview

Mark Antony's Persuasion

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
574 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mark Antony's Persuasion
When I, look at these two speeches there really is no contest. Mark Antony really just takes the cake with his beautiful speech. To be fair Mark Antony had a huge advantage over Brutus in the fact that he got to speak last, so his words were the last the crowds got to hear, but that is not suppose to discredit Mark Antony. He still delivered an Amazing speech and what was overall just better than Brutus’s. This was just a big mistake on Brutus’s part he never should have let Mark Antony speak after his best friend was just killed. There was just simply too much motivation for him compared to a vulnerable Brutus. The first way we are going to look at Mark Antony's speech is through pathos which is an appeal to emotions. This was one of the biggest home-hitters for this speech and most likely why he won the crowd. “When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept”. In that line alone he has already beaten Brutus. Mark Antony is sad and is pouring his heart out, but at the same time is winning the crowd over with sad imagery. This quote shows that Caesar cared he might not have been the best leader but he cared for his people and that is what a sad Mark Antony is trying to get across here. The next …show more content…

Mark Antony at this point had already persuaded them emotionally, but he needed them to actually think about it as well so it would not be just purely emotions that won the crowd over. “For Brutus as you know, was caesar's angel. Judge, O you gods how dearly Caesar loved him! This was the most unkindest cut of all, For when the noble Caesar saw him stab, Ingratitude, more strong than traitors arms, Quite vanquished him”. This is it, this is what brings this whole thing to a shocking close. He makes the crowd think. Why would caesar's right hand man just stab him like that. They were brothers and for him to just stab him for the “good of Rome” the crowd was not buying

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Mark Antony speech was more effective because he reminded the plebeians that Julius Caesar was not ambitious due to that fact he rejected the crown three times. Brutus tells the plebeians the reasoning behind why he were to kill Caesar - that if he were not to kill Caesar, then everyone would die as slaves. Then he said “But, as he was ambitious, I slew him. “(III,ii, 28). In other words, Brutus says the reasoning behind why he killed Caesar was due to the fact that Caesar was ambitious. However, when Mark Antony…

    • 1238 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    First off, Antony was a genius in how he presented his speech to the populous with how he sparked so many different emotions in them. In the beginning of his speech Antony sparks impatience in the Roman people by making them want to hear what Caesar has left them in his will. And when he finally tells them what he included in it, he made them feel melancholy towards their deceased leader who was described by Antony as a noble and respectable man who cared only for the people and the country that he was about to rule over. But very quickly after that, the audience of Antony’s became enraged towards the men who had called themselves his friends and killed Caesar. They wanted to murder them all and avenge their beloved leader. Antony told them not to be angry, but he clearly did this on purpose because he too wanted to avenge Caesar’s death. He very skillfully manipulated these people’s feelings and made them vengeful as he wanted them to be.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mark Antony deftly speaks to his audience in a way that requires them to challenge their preconceived characterizations of Brutus and Cassius. He intentionally expresses the deliberate opposite of what he genuinely wishes and excessively compliments the people to the point that they forget their own seemingly unwavering convictions. His finesse and dexterity in bending words and minds ultimately works to his favor. Antony accomplishes his initial goal to convince the Roman people to revenge Caesar’s demise. This achievement in and of itself exhibits…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony had the better of the two speeches in the play, “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar.” By William Shakespeare. Antony does a very good job of molding the crowds mind about Brutus and to even show his sympathy about the death of Caesar. Brutus knows that he will lose this battle with Antony, yet he holds onto the hope that maybe, just maybe, that the crowd will believe him instead of Antony. “Et tu…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Decius Brutus and Mark Antony, both Roman Senators, eulogize Julius Caesar, each using a different technique and approach. Brutus, in a somewhat arrogant, to the point, eulogy, attempts to sway the people. He justifies conspiring against Caesar by stating that Caesar's ambition would have hurt Rome. However, in Antony's eulogy, he focuses on Caesar's positive traits, and cunningly disproves Brutus' justification for killing Caesar. The fickle Romans waver between leaders, responding emotionally, rather than intellectually, to the orators.<br><br>Brutus seeks to explain why he conspired against Caesar. He begins his speech with "Romans, countrymen ...", appealing to their consciousness as citizens of Rome, who,…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. I felt that Antony’s diction was very formal in his speech; unlike Brutus the crowd does not respond in his speech. Antony uses advance word choice, which makes him look more intelligent to the not so intelligent clump of Romans. An excellent example of his formal diction would be, “ So let it be with Caesar. The Noble Brutus hath told you Caesar was ambitious: if it were so, it was a grievous fault, and grievously hath Caesar answer’d it” (Shakespeare, lines 79-82) the words such as…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is often argued that Antony has the better speech. It is true that Antony did a good job persuading the crowd to go on a rampage. However, Antony is in the wrong, Antony shouldn’t be riling up the crowd to go on a rampage. He should be gathering them as one and uniting them in this time of peril. Brutus had the better speech because he did was right.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everything that was said by Brutus was completely blown away by what Antony says even though he never said anything bad about Brutus. Brutus and Antony are both very good at ethos, pathos and logos, but with the length and persistence of Antony, he won the crowd. By the end of the speech the people of Rome wanted to kill everyone that was in the conspiracy including…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He leads himself as a heartbroken man toward Caesar and tell people what they already know. He use his tear to convince people that he has lost his dear friend and beloved friend and that Caesar loved Rome to the bottom of his heart. He once says “And men have lost their reason and I must pause till it comes back to me,” In a second, Antony tried to control his feeling by stop his speech for a second. Meanwhile, the people started whisperering “Poor soul! His eyes are red as fire with weeping.” His emotion actually effect to the people and it make people willing to hear him speak. “To wrong the dead, to wrong myself and you/ Than I will wrong such honorable men.” He also using the parallelism and repetition for this quote to show that he rather say all the terrible things about himself then telling all the terrible things about an “honorable” men. This parallelism is to repeat the points that Antony will never say such a terrible thing to the “honorable” man. At this point, Antony also uses the word “wrong” to reflected back in their minds that the word “wrong” does not fit for Antony but it’s being taken to describe Brutus as a “honorable” man who murdered Caesar Antony’s beloved and a respectful friend. Antony does not wish to speak all the dishonorable words that against Brutus, he speaks the truth and hope that people will believe in…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    rhetorical appeals

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mark Antony used the three persuasion tools to turn the roman crowd against Brutus. The most convincing use of ethos in Antony’s speech is in the first line of the speech; “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears!” This shows that Mark Antony is trying to get in to the Roman crowd’s hearts. He uses rhetorical irony throughout the speech constantly questioning the ethos of Brutus. “When that the poor cried, Caesar hath wept; ambition should be made of sterner stuff: yet Brutus is an honorable man.” Mark Antony repeats the phrase “yet Brutus is an honorable man” then he says logical statement that proofs Caesar did nothing wrong. Which led the crowd to turn on Brutus, without Antony actually saying that what Brutus did was wrong. Mark Antony uses a lot of facts throughout the course of his speech. One of the key facts in his initial speech is; “When that the poor…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By depicting Brutus’ speech he starts to create doubt and begin to inquire about the logic behind Antony argument against the conspirators. Once he had aroused this feeling of doubt in the plebeians Antony was able to continue with his argument with much more strength and confidence. A point extremely important in Antony's eulogy is persuading the crowd to view Caesar not as a the ambitious man Brutus made him out to be. The evidence that Antony gave the crowd which persuaded them into believing that Caesar was not indeed ambitious, was that "He hath brought many captives home to Rome, / Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill/.. I thrice presented him.a kingly crown/ Which he did thrice refuse. Was this ambition?/ Yet Brutus says he…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Caesar start

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Antony's funeral speech was much more effective because his use of nnsmsnsnmsmsmdmd ndmkdmd mxdm mxmmd. Mmcmcmmmd mcmmdmc mxmxmmc ckkckxmmd kfdlmmdm mddlmc k. Jdjdn nsnnnd nndndn jdmxm nxnmxn . Bdnxmx mfmcm nmmdPathos, ethos, and logos are three persuasive tools used by Antony and Brutus at Caesar's funeral. Both Brutus and Antony's speeches given, greatly impacted the citizens of Rome . This passage, Julius Caesar, is written by William Shakespeare. This is a play based on a historical event led by the tragedy of the Roman leader ,Caesar, who was killed by his disloyal friends. Within this passage, Brutus and a group of conspirators gathered together upon the action to betrayal Caesar and take over the city Rome. In addition, they all believed that Caesar did not deserve the throne and they had to destroy him. At Caesar’s funeral both Brutus and Antony created heartfelt speeches in order to persuade the flustered citizens of Rome. However, I can conclude that the logos, pathos, and ethos in Antony's speech was much more persuadable than Brutus's unfavorable speech.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus came out not knowing what he was going to get himself into and that’s probably why his wasn't as compassionate as Antony’s. Brutus trusted Antony and didn’t think he needed to compare his speech with anyone else’s. Antony’s speech connected with the citizens. His speech had emotion, hate, and revenge written all over it. Antony made pitty for Caesar by showing the people what Caesar had left for them. Antony knew what he was doing all along. He knew he had to get revenge on the conspiracers because they killed his friend, and this is what he had to do. Antony showed the citizens Caesar’s cloak and blamed each conspiracy for the murder. Throughout the whole speech Antony stayed calm and contained himself which is what the people want. Antony got what he wanted and he got it by having his speech win the people…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both speeches are very reluctant and have a persuasive passion about each topic. Moreover, Brutus's speech is more eloquent than Antony's speech considering it talks about Caesar's honor and his wisdom. Both essays start off with "Romans, countrymen..." (III.ii.13) (III.ii.72) Antony's speech talks more about burying Caesar, instead of praising him like Brutus's speech. Which is why Brutus's speech is more persuasive than Antony's speech because Brutus talks about only great things about Caesar and uplifts his spirit, unlike Antony who downgrades on…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The art of manipulation and persuasion is truly effective when one is incompetent to the fact that they alone are not thinking for themselves. Since the beginning of time, humankind has wanted to have control. In some instances they will strive for power in ways that make them oblivious to right and wrong. Occasionally, they will go against what they are told to do and instead to what they want to do. In the play Julius Caesar the power of persuasion and manipulation of language is clear when two men, Brutus and Mark Antony, spiel to the people of their country, each attempting to gain the support of the populace over the death of Caesar. Even though Brutus establishes ethos throughout his speech, Mark Antony’s uses it to his advantage…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays