Market Structures
University of Phoenix
Market Structures
In this paper, we will discuss the four market structures of Monopoly, Oligopoly, Monopolistic Competition and Pure Competition. We have identified four companies that operate in each of these market structures: Salt River Project, The Coca Cola Company, Russ 's Market, and Columbia House. In each market structure we will describe the pricing and non-pricing strategies of the companies operating in that market. We will also examine Quasar, a notebook computer company. They entered the market with a new product and we will explain the progress from one market segment to the next as the lifecycle of the product changes and the number of suppliers and consumers also that changed along with it.
Monopoly Market Structure The concept of monopoly arises when one firm is the sole producer and marketer of a product or service. According to McConnell and Brue (2004) monopolies come in being when a single firm is the sole producer of a product that has no close substitutes. Monopolies are characterized by a single seller, no close substitutes, price maker, blocked entry and non price competition. The market structure that Salt River Project called SRP operates in is monopoly. SRP is the sole generator of electricity in the Phoenix metropolitan area. The SRP website (2007) state that the company established in 1937 generates hydro, thermal and gas operated electricity. The Phoenix area is specifically assigned to SRB by the government and no other company competes with it. The company uses different pricing strategies to deal with its customers. The strategies are penetration pricing which is designed to initially capture a customer by charging low prices, (Koh, 2005). They also use price matching which matches the price charged by other monopolies like APS, geographical pricing which results in charging different prices in different geographical areas and
References: Carbonated Soft Drinks Industry Profile: United States. (2005, December). Carbonated Soft Drinks Industry Profile: United States, Retrieved Saturday, June 23, 2007, from Business Source Complete database. Charter, A. (2005, October 31). Private Label Power. SN: Supermarket News, 53(44), 49-50. Retrieved Saturday, June 23, 2007, from Business Source Complete database. Contact (2007) Monthly Newsletter of the Salt River Project March 2007 Edition. Cosgrove, J. (2004, October). The gateway to retailer loyalty. Beverage Industry, 95(10), 14-15. Retrieved Saturday, June 23, 2007, from Business Source Complete database. Jeffrey, D. (1996, April 6). Anti-club sentiment strong at NARM. Billboard, 108(14), 6. Retrieved June 23, 2007, from Academic Search Premier database. Koh, T. (2005). The micro foundation of intertemporal price discrimination . Retrieved Friday, June 22, 2007, from Ebscohost. McConnell, C. and Brue, S. (2004). Economics: Principles, problems and policies (16th ed.). New York:McGraw-Hill. Price Strategies. (2007). Retrieved Friday, June 22, 2007, from en.wikipedia.org. Prince, G. (2007, May 15). 125 Events that Changed the Beverage World. Beverage World, 126(5), 46-78. Retrieved Saturday, June 23, 2007, from Business Source Complete database. Salt River Project History. (2007). Retrieved Friday, June 22, 2007, from www.srpnet.com. Strategic Pricing. (2007). Retrieved Friday, June 22, 2007, from www.marketingteacher.com. The Coca-Cola Company. (2006, June). The Coca-Cola Company, Retrieved Saturday, June 23, 2007, from Business Source Complete database. University of Phoenix. (2005). Market Structures [computer software]. Retrieved on Saturday, June 23, 2007, from University of Phoenix rEsource Simulation, MBA/501-Forces Influencing Business in the 21st Century. Yarbrough M A (2006) The nature of monopolies. Retrieved Sunday, June 24, 2007, from Zegler, J. (2007, March). Functional demands exceed soft drinks ' standard form. Beverage Industry, 98(3), 10-15. Retrieved Saturday, June 23, 2007, from Business Source Complete database.