In philosophical treatises philosophers of times construct complex examples to support their claims. These examples are not expressive in the same way that literary works are which is why Nussbaum holds that novels are a fitting form for philosophical content. Schematic examples do not allow the reader to deeply connect with the content because they do not have “good fiction’s way of making the reader a participant and a friend”. Becoming a moral agent requires that an individual works at and is actively engaged in the development of their moral education. Nussbaum further argues that presenting schematic examples takes the work out of developing one’s own moral character. Examples used in philosophical writings are “ethically salient” meaning that they make obvious to the reader what is significant. By presenting such a concise example reader is not able to find the important details themselves, which Nussbaum argues is crucial to developing
In philosophical treatises philosophers of times construct complex examples to support their claims. These examples are not expressive in the same way that literary works are which is why Nussbaum holds that novels are a fitting form for philosophical content. Schematic examples do not allow the reader to deeply connect with the content because they do not have “good fiction’s way of making the reader a participant and a friend”. Becoming a moral agent requires that an individual works at and is actively engaged in the development of their moral education. Nussbaum further argues that presenting schematic examples takes the work out of developing one’s own moral character. Examples used in philosophical writings are “ethically salient” meaning that they make obvious to the reader what is significant. By presenting such a concise example reader is not able to find the important details themselves, which Nussbaum argues is crucial to developing