Preview

Marx Versus de Tocqueville

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
964 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marx Versus de Tocqueville
Christopher English
Foundations of Social Science
Dr. Kelley
9/17/12
Marx versus De Tocqueville Intelligent, respected, revolutionary, and revered are just some of the superlatives used to describe the multitalented Karl Marx and Alexis De Tocqueville. These two European men both living during the time of the French Revolution, would go on to create works and research that would socially shake up the world. Both individuals held drastically different views about society as a whole, Democracy, socialism, the revolution, and whether or not society could be categorized. Even though they have varying opinions spanning many different topics one fact is un-debatable, that without the lifetime contributions of both Marx and De Tocqueville the Social Sciences as we know them, and the way society views itself would never be the same. Karl Heinrich Marx was born into a middle-class family in Germany, in 1818. As a young man he became interested in ideas of Hegelians, studied philosophy, and began writing for a local newspaper, and eventually creating his own newspaper. Marx’s influence began to pick up steam as he teamed up with friend and fellow socialist Friedrich Engels. With Engels as a co-writer of great literary pieces, Marx became one of the most influential people during and since his time. Alexis De Tocqueville was born to parents of provincial nobility in Northern France in 1805. De Tocqueville became interested in politics as a young man and pursued politics at a young age which eventually led him to America where he would later complete his most famous work, the book Democracy in America. The subject of Democracy pits Marx and De Tocqueville on two different sides of the spectrum. One of their most glaring differences is when it comes to the Democratic government and the idea of liberty and private ownership. Marx thought the social inequality due to the capitalist system would always impede the progress of the Americans and the supposed “sovereignty of



Cited: Marx, Karl, Friedrich Engels, and Martin Puchner. The Communist Manifesto and Other Writings. New York: Barnes & Noble, 2005. Print. Tocqueville, Alexis De, and Isaac Kramnick. Democracy in America: An Annotated Text Backgrounds Interpretations. New York: W.W. Norton &, 2007. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ever since he was born, Tocqueville had been exposed to politics and government. His father was the mayor of Verneuil, which was where much of Tocqueville's childhood was spent. As he grew up he took courses in law, which eventually aided him in writing Democracy in America. While on official business to view the American penal system, Tocqueville got his first taste of democracy. When the twenty eight year old de Tocqueville returned to France he began writing Democracy in America. While composing it, Tocqueville has a specific audience and purpose in mind. In the 1830's the government in France was very unstable. Tocqueville's intentions for his book, Democracy in America, were to convince the French aristocracy that a democracy would be a superior form of government to a monarchy for the people of France. If this idea was exposed to and accepted by the aristocracy then it would eventually be accepted by the lower classes, and hopefully bring about permanent reform.…

    • 977 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why did Karl Marx regard the working class to be the only revolutionary class under capitalism?…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tocqueville Essay

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Alexis de Tocqueville believed that government control lied within the majority of the United States. He believed the United States to be a land of equality, liberty, and political wisdom, and considered it a land where the government only served as a voice for its citizens. However, abuse of that power can lead the majority to exceed its limits. The majority had a strong influence on not just the government, but also the whole nation. However, this was untrue for the minority. The minorities’ views were rarely heard. They had practically no say in who they wanted to elect, as the majority held most of the power.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Justice in Texas

    • 2550 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Schmidt, S. W., Bardes, B. A., Shelley, M. C., Crain, E., & Maxwell, W. E. (2007). American Government and Politics Today. New York: Cengage Learning.…

    • 2550 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tocqueville's post French-progressive Democracy in America analyzed the victories and disappointments of 19th century America, with an eye towards the democratization of Western Europe. Mills On Liberty, distributed after 25 years, is viewed as an establishing record of liberal considering. Together, the two political philosophers effective contentions for individual freedom and fair government – yet from alternate points of view. With diverse foundations and distinctive political substances, it is not shocking that Tocqueville and Mill have distinctive perspectives on numerous issues; what is amazing is the quantity of striking likenesses they do…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Marx, Karl, Engels, Friedrich edited by McLellan, David. The Communist Manifesto. New York, United States: Oxford University Press, 1992. Print.…

    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In ‘Democracy in America’, Alexis De Tocqueville analyses democracy, seen as egalitarian social conditions. While he acknowledges its merits in guaranteeing the economic and political stability of nations, he also warns that democratic systems have the potential to bring about various social handicaps, namely ‘individualism’ and ‘democratic nepotism’ - unless intermediate institutions are introduced. Marx, on the hand, dismisses the idea that politics are at the heart of modern society’s issues, and rather argues that capitalist economies are precisely the root of any pathologies modernity brings about. Tocqueville argues that democratic societies, by virtue of seeking equality, inevitably lead to individualism, which he defines as “a clam and considered feeling which disposes each citizen to isolate himself from the mass of his fellows”.…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Indian Removal Act

    • 2222 Words
    • 9 Pages

    12. Tocqueville, Alexis De, and J. P. Mayer. Democracy in America. Garden City, NY: Doubleday,…

    • 2222 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tocqueville and Marx both held vigorous beliefs on what the new systems of government and economy of the time could or will inevitable lead to. On one hand Marx saw the history of the world through the lense of class struggle, leading to his conclusion that the ever growing capitalist system was no more than another edition to the eternal conflict between the oppressor and the oppressed. “The Modern Bourgeois society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes and New conditions of oppression.” On the contrary Tocqueville did not view the newly emerging systems (Mostly democracy) as the problem but the abuse of said systems.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America. American Studies at the University of Virginia, 2009. Web. 31 July 2012.…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tocqueville, Alexis.Democracy in America volumes 1 & 2. Henry Reeve. 1832 & 1840. Project Gutenberg. 21 Jan. 2006 and…

    • 3383 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “How?”, one may ask. Individual thoughts don’t have the same voice as others. More clearly put, the democratic process is demonstrated when the majority concludes on an initiative while the minority must comply with that passed initiative. Freedom is acknowledging one’s own free will and thought no matter if their opinion lies in the minority. “Although men cannot become absolutely equal unless they are entirely free; and consequently equality, pushed to its furthest extent, may be confounded with freedom, yet there is good reason for distinguishing the one from the other”, quotes Tocqueville (Tocqueville, Democracy in America, pg.220) Reaching for an unrealistic standard of equality will diminish Tocqueville’s idea of freedom. There is no such phenomenon as complete utter equality. As mentioned by Tocqueville, his ideology summarizes quality of condition almost perfectly. Therefore, his point on freedom is the opposite of the idea of egalitarianism, which Marx supports…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Liberalism and Freedom

    • 2901 Words
    • 12 Pages

    one may ask whether or not the ideas and goals of classical liberalism have been…

    • 2901 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The impact of religion is obvious everywhere in our public life, in the same time being a dynamic connection between faith and citizenship, as we well know. For many Americans, religion was the core of being, even though many authors ignored this history of faith. Protestantism is the religion most often related to liberalism .…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Communist Manifesto was originally titled The Manifesto of the Communist Party (Das Manifest der Kommunistischen Partei) and was written by Karl Marx and was edited by Frederick Engels. It was published for the first time in 1848 and became a topic for different debates from those times. The Communist Manifesto was republished for many times even during the life of its authors, however it never been amended. In the preface to the German edition in 1872, Engels said that The Communist Manifesto is a historical document and we have no right to change it. We should to mention that this major policy document provides a holistic and systematic exposition of the basic principles of Marxism, the main core of which is the doctrine of not only a world, but also a historic role of the proletariat as a class that considered to be the founder of communist society, moreover the doctrine of the proletariat to the ruling class, is the doctrine of the dictatorship of the proletariat. The Manifesto describes the main purposes of the communist party for ending of unfair exploitation of the working class full of suffering and creating a new society with equal rights and freedoms for all people, without social classes and social division.…

    • 1846 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays