Preview

Marxism: Life For Europeans During The 1800s

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
665 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Marxism: Life For Europeans During The 1800s
Chad McKeegan
Mr. Horner
AP European History
10 April 2013
Marxism Essay Life for Europeans during the 1800s only contained two possibilities of economic wellbeing because, as Marx would note, the wealth was not evenly distributed between the social classes. The majority of the wealth was obtained by the upper class or people with power, such as business tycoons as a result of the capitalistic economy that existed. Based on the paintings presented, Marxism theorists would exemplify that the economic differences between the two families is a result of class conflict, but Social Darwinists would argue that differences are primarily caused by their biological disadvantages to the environment. At a glance people tend to associate Marxism
…show more content…
When examining the painting of the wealthy European family the degree of wealth is clearly visible in both the environment and the people. The wealthy family seems to be surrounded by various items of wealth, such as paintings, ritzy furniture, fancy curtains, and the prestigious clothing they wear all contribute to the expression of content visible on their faces. In contrast the deprived family is clustered together with their several children because it was necessary for the children to work in order to receive manageable income. This painting in particular expurgates a vicarious feeling of sorrow and misery, which is clearly visible in every family member’s face. Marxist theorists would argue that the wealthy family can afford luxurious items and live peacefully every day, while the poor family struggles because there was an incredibly uneven distribution of wealth. Based on the labor theory, the worker is cheated of the value his labor creates, which the low wages of workers meant the threat of over – production, accumulated goods, and depression. The poor family cannot earn enough money to comfortably live day to day because the corporate business owners and those of nobility do not pay the workers enough, and siphon all of the accumulated

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx’ theory of the relations of production can be used as an important platform in locating the origins of class and gender inequity to the early stages of capitalism. In his theory ‘the relations of production’ he explained that private ownership of…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moreover, Marxism highlights that the family benefit some groups more than others. It highlights the importance of economic influences on family life and it raises the possibility that the ruling class benefits more that the subject class. It also see that the family provides comfort to alienated workers to enable them to carry on working…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the second half of the nineteenth century, there was a second Industrial Revolution in Western Europe that brought new industries, sources of energy, and goods. This changed the entire human environment and Europeans believed that this material progress was a sign of human progress; they thought that the new scientific and technological accomplishments would improve humanity and solve all of their human problems. Western Europeans’ views began to change; there were new concepts and ideas that altered their society and they gained a new image of themselves, their country, and the world.…

    • 2184 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    wealth and power in a society. Utilizing Marxism criticism, we can further delve under the…

    • 2664 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dbq Poverty Analysis

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Today, poverty is prevalent throughout the world with 80% of humanity living on less than $10 a day. However, this isn’t the first time poverty is seen so frequently in society. During the Renaissance, approximately 50% of Europe’s population lived at a subsistence level with 80% of Europeans facing possible starvation in times of peril. In the midst of this time period, as poverty ran rampant it led to differing attitudes towards helping the poor as well as the concept of poverty. Poverty was viewed by the upper class as well as humanists as a negative influence to society due to characteristics like idleness which was thought to be the beginning of all evils. Meanwhile, religious officials like the clergy as well as artists thought that the poor should be assisted for spiritual benefits and believed that aiding the poor was only…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociology 24 marks

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the Marxists, our society is largely influenced by wealth. They believe that big businesses help capitalists because majority of the money goes towards them. Also, when big business owners have children the business will pass down to them which means the rich will stay rich and the poor will stay poor as it is harder for them to get a good change. Middle and lower class people are taught in schools the rules and how to respect the higher class. This supports the Marxist theory as it shows how the family does help the interests of capitalism.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This created a disparity between the rich and the working poor. This stage in society separation, known as socialism and marked by unequal pay for the work performed, is the intermediate stage between capitalism and communism, according to German philosopher and revolutionary socialist Karl Marx’s theory “The Communist Manifest”. (“Karl Marx” 2011) Marx described Communism “as a society in which each person should contribute according to their ability and receive according to their need”. (“Karl Marx” 2011)…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    marx and carnegie

    • 1118 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For centuries, many philosophers have discussed the issue of class struggle. Karl Marx and Andrew Carnegie both developed theories of the unequal distribution of wealth a long time ago; however the only Carnegie’s ideology could apply to American society today. In “The Communist Manifesto”, Marx first introduces the two main social classes: bourgeois (the upper class) and proletarians (the lower class or working class). He points out the revolution of industrialism has made changes of Capitalism to Communism. He suggests that the rich should redistribute property evenly because the proletarians have put a lot effort contributing in the revolution. In contrast, Carnegie analyzes in “The Gospel of Wealth”, the unequal distribution of wealth is a natural consequence of civilization. Both Marx and Carnegie present the problem within society because they want to contribute their own experiences from various views to resolve the tension between the rich and poor efficiently.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the story “Brave New World” by Aldous Huxley, one can see that the author truly wishes his readers to analyze the book via the subsets of Marxism. The first and foremost rationale of the text lending itself to a Marxist analysis comes from the symbolism portrayed by the surname of the main character in the book. Bernard Marx seems to be such a unique and peculiar name that one can with certainty assume that there must be reasoning for it, especially considering the context of this novel. In the first few introductions to Bernard, he narrates his distaste towards his fellow colleagues for “talking about [Lenina] as though she were a bit of meat. Have her here, have her there. Like mutton. Degrading her to so much mutton” (Huxley 39). In the mind of Bernard, his colleagues do not treat Lenina as an equivalent human being who belongs to the same and equal faction as his colleagues. Instead, through the eyes of Bernard she is seen simply as ‘degrading’ meat. Bernard’s hatred towards this subject matter exemplifies conceivably the similarities between the thoughts of Karl Marx and Bernard. From this, one can easily anticipate that Bernard Marx will play a pivotal role that maybe shadows the thoughts of the real Karl Marx in around the period of Huxley’s era. One can even go about saying that perhaps the vast popularity of Marxism at the time of this novel’s publication posed a direct influence on Huxley’s perception of society, which he then applied to the story. Quite ironically however, later on in the novel while Bernard watches the clear ocean, “it makes [him] feel as though [he] was more [him]… More on [his] own, not so completely a part of something else. Not just a cell in the social body” (Huxley 78). In these more updated and comprehensive thoughts of Bernard Marx, one can realize that his aversion towards the collective society of the World State shatters the previous anticipations…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marxism in Brave New World

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1. According to some studies, the use of a cell phone can slightly decrease the risk of…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout history, a divide has always existed between the rich and poor in society. However, during the Industrial Revolution in Victorian England, this rift reached its peak. The working class labored for long hours and received miniscule wages, whereas the bourgeoisie grew abundantly wealthy through the labor of the working class. Published in 1848 and 1854 respectively, Karl Marx’s The Communist Manifesto and Charles Dickens’ Hard Times both comment on these troubles. While Hard Times is a novel which tells a story and The Communist Manifesto is a short publication which tries to bring about social change, both writings offer a sharp critique of the class antagonism brought about by capitalism at the height of the Industrial Revolution.…

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Revolutions In The 1800s

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Comparing Revolutions Paper Revolutions have occurred throughout history and will continue to do so in the future. Between 1774 and 1830, several significant revolutions took place that have had a profound impact on the world we live in today. However, each revolution has its own unique characteristics and differences in how they occurred and impacted different parts of the world. By examining and comparing these similarities and differences, we can gain a deeper understanding of how these revolutions are interconnected. Starting with a common word that is used in revolutions, revolts.…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Revolutions In The 1800s

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Comparing Revolutions Paper Revolutions have occurred throughout history and will continue to do so in the future. Between 1774 and 1830, several significant revolutions took place that have had a profound impact on the world we live in today. However, each revolution has its own unique characteristics and differences in how they occurred and impacted different parts of the world. By examining and comparing these similarities and differences, we can gain a deeper understanding of how these revolutions are interconnected. Starting with a common word that is used in revolutions, revolts.…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx vs. Weber

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Karl Marx and Max Weber offer two very different but valid approaches to social class in modern capitalist society. In a capitalist society the private ownership of the means of production is the dominant form of providing the things needed to survive. What distinguishes capitalism from other types of society is the emphasis on the rights of property and the individual owner’s right to employ capital, as she or he thinks fit.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another point that appealed and I found to be relevant in today’s society was Marx’s ideas on class distinction. With the acceptance that “10% of the people have 100% of the property”, this ratio of figures has definite parallels in today’s means of class distinction and in particular wealth; with 20% of the United States population having almost 90% of the wealth. The stratification Marx underlines is comparable to the outlined differences seen in society this modern day.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays