Hegemonic masculinity refers to the dominant form of masculinity, and is a measure by which men compare themselves and others. However, hegemonic masculinity risks oversimplification of the “situational complexity of contemporary Western societies” (Sobal, 2005: 151). Meanwhile, flexible masculinities “emphasize the negotiation and management of a dynamic and situational process, in which men may select from a variety of models of manhood that may be evaluated, invoked, and enacted” (Sobal, 2005: 151). Men are afforded multiple forms of masculinity that they can invoke depending on the situation, of which cooking is one platform, depending on what form of masculinity they wish to
Hegemonic masculinity refers to the dominant form of masculinity, and is a measure by which men compare themselves and others. However, hegemonic masculinity risks oversimplification of the “situational complexity of contemporary Western societies” (Sobal, 2005: 151). Meanwhile, flexible masculinities “emphasize the negotiation and management of a dynamic and situational process, in which men may select from a variety of models of manhood that may be evaluated, invoked, and enacted” (Sobal, 2005: 151). Men are afforded multiple forms of masculinity that they can invoke depending on the situation, of which cooking is one platform, depending on what form of masculinity they wish to