Our world today is increasingly driven by a mass media due to the explosion of different means of communication, especially electronic communication such as satellite TV and Internet. The media is viewed as a source of power that influences, controls, and promotes new standards in the society and reinforces the existing ones. As the media increases in use as our prime source for information and values, there is a great need to critically evaluate inherent socio-political and cultural barriers. This study is conducted to identify inherent socio-political and cultural barriers for mass media impact on Indian society. The study will help to understand the inherent barriers involved in mass media impact through conceptual or qualitative reasoning.
Key words: Mass media, barriers, Indian, impact, mass communication
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The growth of media as an industry has accelerated over the past few years with new forms such as DVD and the internet changing the way we, the audience, consume and receive media. In an interdependent and globalized political world, the challenge of the media is to provide extensive coverage of global politics and to examine the impact of these influences in specific national contexts (Mazzoleni, 2003). The mass media has a role to influence socio-political and cultural settings. Numbers of researchers have been conducting studies worldwide to investigate what they might contribute to an understanding of the economic and other factors that influence mass media, and how the media in turn influence the political climate and the democratic process in modern democracies (Alexander and Hanson, 1999, Zillmann, 2002, Bennett and Entman, 2001). Mass media is considered one of the principal agents for societal development, democracy and good governance. Media critics claim that at times mass media has not played the role that it should have played and have played in the hands of few vested interest (Kellner 2004; Fog, 2004). The
References: Alexander, A., and Hanson, J., Taking Sides. Mass Media and Society. CT: Dushkin/ McGraw-Hill. 1999 Bandura, A., Social Cognitive Theory of Mass Communication Croteau, D., and Hoynes. W., Media/Society. Industries, Images, and Audiences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press. 2000 Doyle G., Understanding Media Economics Dua, M.R., Media and Development, ed, AMIC Singapore Har-Anand Publications, 2006 p 106 Fog A., The supposed and the real role of mass media in modern democracy, Working paper, 2004-05-20 Folkerts, J., & Lacy, S. The Media in Your Life, Pearson Education, 2005, p8 Gandhi S Gillette R., Advertising on Public Television: Current Policy in Western, Central and Eastern Europe. International Research & Exchanges Board, Washington DC, 2001 www.irex.org/pubs/media/PubTvAd_gilletteAll.pdf Grisprud, J Gunther R, and Mughan A (eds) Democracy and the Media: A Comparative Perspective. Cambridge University Press, 2000 Habermas J., The structural Transformation of the public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society Johri, S.M. Out in the Field, 2006, MCRF, p 189-194 Kellner D., The Media and Social Problems Klier P., Im Dreieck von Demokratie, Offentlichkeit und Massenmedien. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, 1990 Luhmann, N Mazzoleni G, Stewart J, Horsfield B (eds) The Media and Neo-Populism: A Contemporary Comparative Analysis. Praeger, Westport, 2003 McQuail D., Media Accountability and Freedom of Publication Miller, M.R. The Millennium Matrix, Jossey-Bass, 2004 Page, D., & Crawley, W., Satellites over South Asia: Broadcasting Culture and the Public Interest, Sage 2001p 143-145), Saviotti P.P., Applied Evolutionary Economics: New Empirical Methods and Simulation Techniques. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK , 2003 Scheufele, D Wolfsfeld, G. Media and Political Conflict, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1997 Wolfsfeld, G Zillmann D., Exemplification Theory of Media Influence. In: Bryant J, Zillmann D (eds) Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. 2 'nd edition. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey, 2002 Acknowledgement: