Preview

Master Morality vs. Slave Morality: Neiztche

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
860 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Master Morality vs. Slave Morality: Neiztche
Master Morality vs. Slave Morality: Neiztche Wikipedia defines morality as “a system of principles and judgments based on cultural, religious, and philosophical concepts and beliefs, by which humans determine whether given actions are right or wrong.” (Wikipedia Morality) Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche, a German philosopher thought up of the idea that there are two moralities; The master and slave morality. These define a person by there actions to there world around them and how they handle certain situations they encounter throughout their natural life. I believe he chose these two because they seem to be strong opposites and there are rational. The first morality Nietzsche writes about is the master morality. Nietzsche defined master morality as the morality of the strong-willed. For these men the “good” is the noble, strong and powerful, while the “bad” is the weak, cowardly, timid and petty. Master morality begins in the “noble man” with a spontaneous idea of the “good”, then the idea of “bad” develops in opposition to it (On the Genealogy of Morals). He stated: “The noble type of man experiences itself as determining values; it does not need approval; it judges, what is harmful to me is harmful in itself”; it knows itself to be that which first accords honor to things; it is value-creating” (Beyond Good and Evil). Nietzsche rationalized the idea that it was the heroes, or the “good”, that gave the master moratlity it’s name. It was not the actual good in it’s self. They realized they were good when they witnessed what would threaten them: the common people, the poor and the weak. Their position of power included the power over words, the power to decide what would be called “good” and what “bad” (On The Genealogy of Morals). Basically, it means is that what would good be with out bad? You couldn’t define anything unless it had something to contradict or contrast it. On the other end of the spectrum is the slave moratilty. The slave morality is


Cited: Alderman, Harold. "Nietzsche 's "Will to Power" and the "Master/Slave" Morality." 19 Apr. 2007 <http://academics.triton.edu/uc/nietzsche.html>. Nietzche, Friedrich. On The Genealogy of Morals. 19 Apr. 2007 <http://www.mala.bc.ca/~johnstoi/Nietzsche/genealogy1.htm>. Partridge, Ernest. "Chapter Four: A Master of Morality." Conscience of a Progressive. 19 Apr. 2007 <http://gadfly.igc.org/progressive/4-master.htm>. Peterson, Thomas. "Slave and Master Morality." Philosophy Lander. 19 Apr. 2007 <http://philosophy.lander.edu/ethics/notes-nietzsche.html#3>. "Wikipedia." Master-Slave Morality. 19 Apr. 2007 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master-Slave_Morality>. “Wikipedia.” Morality. 19 Apr. 2007 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morality>

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The first notion relies heavily on previously conceived notions of morality from past philosophers. Following the ideas of widely accepted pre-Nietzschean moral philosophy, in forgetting our mistakes so that we can “feel better” about ourselves, we discard the…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eng103 1ST Essay

    • 1310 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It is quite obvious that Nietzsche strongly believed that Christianity has nonetheless, demean our human rights by being one of the “founding fathers” of morality. Nietzsche claimed that morality is anti-nature, thus the creator of such a “self-torturing” principle, that…

    • 1310 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Friedrich Nietzsche is a German Philosopher, who studied and written several critical texts. The type of texts he wrote were along the lines of philosophy, religion, contemporary culture, and science. Nietzsche is known for a lot of his work, but master-slave morality is highly valued. Master-slave morality was the first subject in Nietzsche’s book, On the Genealogy of Morality. In this book Nietzsche defines the difference between Slave morality and Master morality. When Nietzsche compares between the two types of morality he distinguish strength versus weakness, the difference is primarily one of power and also love independence. The master knows he has power and abilities to aspire to excellence, also he…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Critical philosophers of the nineteenth century were less sure that general moral qualities could be maintained. For Marx morality and morals were a piece of middle class philosophy: sets of thoughts that overlooked the exploitative monetary courses of action of society and added to False Consciousness. Nietzsche took a gander at the starting points of morality, and like Marx, saw moral frameworks as emerging from the hobbies of social gatherings. For Nietzsche the individual needed to go past acknowledged morality to make another morality for him. In the twentieth century, there has been developing negativity about the likelihood of a widespread moral framework. Jean-Paul Sartre accentuated the subjective judgments that an individual must make so as to be genuine.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm, Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future. Edited by Rolf-Peter Horstmann, Judith Norman; translated by Judith Norman. Cambridge University Press, 2002.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    The more powerful, noble men saw themselves as good when they observed the contrast between themselves and those inferior to them: the weak, poor, and common people. Here Nietzsche introduces the contrast between master morality and slave morality and how the first concept of good and bad arose. As I mentioned earlier, the masters, nobles, and stronger people defined good as a reflection of themselves. Now when they came to contact with the weak, the slaves, the poor, and the common people, they attributed the concept of bad to them as the opposite side to what they saw on themselves. Their position of power is what also gave them control over language the power label things such as what is good and what is bad. On the other hand when the weak side came into contact with the nobles, after realizing they were inferior to the nobles, the feeling of ressentiment arose, which as we will later see, rearranged the concept of good and…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    PHI2000 The Good Life

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    References: Rachels, J. & Rachels, S. (2010). The elements of moral philosophy (6th ed.). New York,…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated Bibliography

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nietzsche here specifies that his task is not simply to expose the psychological and historical eventuality that make for different moralities, but to question moralities for their objective value. It is exposed how a particular morality comes from a tradition. Nietzsche states how the only thing that matters is their current, actual functional value in objective terms, and their potential functional value. The work can be used to determine whether the values of the road’s protagonist’s actions are subjective, meaning they fit the characters needs. It can also be used to determine if there is any source of absolute morality in the novel.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Social Responsibility

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages

    References: Arthur, J., & Scalet, S. (2009). Morality and Moral Controversies (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson, Prentice Hall.…

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In these three pieces we have read there is a strong thread of evil and power separately throughout each of them and also how evil and power play a role when the other is present. Each piece views evil and power differently but also has common ideas. A common idea in each piece is that power can be good or evil depending on the factors involved. Nietzsche wrote that power is happiness and this is true in all three pieces as well as in real life, people are always working to have more control and be trusted with more power Power dictates good, bad, and evil.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Choosing what morality is determined by, may be the problem in its own-self. Great men have contemplated where morality really lies, though many of them have took another's work to serve as the guide to strive for their own progression. Through the progression of these studies one can conclude that happiness is a focal point in the works of many great men. It seems to be one of the basis of which humanity uses as their definition of morality.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Nietzsche: the Conscience

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In his second essay of the Geneaology of Morals, Nietzsche attempts to identify and explain the origin of the conscience. He does not adopt the view of the conscience that is accepted by the “English Psychologists”, such as Bentham, J. Mill, J.S. Mill and Hume, as the result of an innate moral feeling. Rather, it is his belief that the moral content of our conscience is formed during childhood under the influence of society. Nietzsche defines the conscience as an introspective phenomenon brought about by a feeling of responsibility, in which one analyzes their own morality due to the internalization of the values of society. This definition holds the position that the conscience is not something innate to humans, rather it has arisen through evolution. In light of this, this paper will give insight into how Nietzsche reaches this conclusion, as well as what results from it. In order to do this there will be discussion of guilt, punishment, the will to power and implications from society.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Beyond Good & Evil written by Friedrich Nietzsche book, he mentions two systems of morals that are known as master morality and slave morality. Master morality examines actions of good and bad as slave morality examines actions of good and evil. In Beyond Good & Evil master morality is seen as the free and strong–willed, more as a positive aspect. As on the other hand, slavery morality is seen as the weak and obedient to the master with a negative aspect. Each morality has its pros and cons and they both blame each other for the bad and evil. However, in this paper, I will be mostly focusing on the master morality and its virtues and how its virtues can be unfair to others and to the masters. Whatsoever it could be somewhat better for us as humans.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his work, Nietzsche introduces the concepts of Master and Slave Morality and with them, the problem of the Ascetic Ideal. Master morality is, in short, a morality of strength, individualism, and nobility that weighs actions on their consequences. Slave morality, on the other hand, values humility, sympathy, and kindness. It values actions based on whether their intent was one of “good” or “evil.” He links Slave morality to the moral codes of Christianity and emphasises that morality of “good” or “evil” is ultimately harmful. However, in modern times, Nietzsche believes that everyone experiences the struggle between Master and Slave morality.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In fact, he questions the “slanderous intent” adopted with the use of such words. For Nietzsche, the will to power is not motivated by “any morality or immorality,” because the will to power is life itself and thus precedes morality altogether. Similarly, exploitation, as “a consequence of the will to power,” is a part of our natural inclinations as living beings, since we are proprietors of the will to power. Thus, when we exercise our will to power and perform acts of exploitation (as in superimposing others’ wills with our own), we are neither doing good nor ill, but simply living according to our…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays