Should a pregnant woman who consumes illegal drugs that damage her child be punished as a criminal? Explain your reasoning with references to support your thoughts and ideas.…
Without the availability of methadone treatment many of these babies would have been born to an addict, likely still abusing drugs, born suffering from withdrawals, something nobody would want to witness. Many would not survive the pregnancy, the birth, or the withdrawals. Having experienced withdrawals while watching my son experience them was the hardest thing I have ever done. My son agrees and has said in many of groups, watching his mother experiencing withdrawals was the most painful thing he has ever experienced. He is very grateful that Methadone is treatment available and it’s safe.…
Weber, Ellen (2006). Child Welfare Interventions for Drug Dependent Pregnant Women: Limitations of Non-Public Health Response. UMKC Law Review. 75 UMKC 789. Retrieved 10 March 2012, from Westlaw Campus…
I believe that what the mother does before she is pregnant is her business. If a woman drinks, smokes, or does any other type of bodily harm to herself with substances, even though it is wrong, it is her body and she can do what she pleases with it. But when that same woman becomes pregnant, her focus should be that developing creature in her belly. The woman should discontinue the use of all teratogens because she is now responsible for two lives.…
Sterilization is the surgical process after which a person can no longer reproduce. The process in permanent and irreversible. It is a choice for people but laws are considering to enforce it on the unfortunate group of drug-addicted mothers. The drug-addicted mothers are wholly held responsible for the Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS), a group of problems that a new born has to face because the mother was dependant on illegal or prescribed drugs. The baby becomes addicted with the mother, and is still dependent on drug at the time of birth. With an increase in the number of babies born addicted to drugs, the lawmakers considered forced sterilization upon drug-addicted mothers as the most effective solution to eradicate this issue forever. However, such a prospect is appalling as it violates human rights, contradicts established laws, legalizes the practice of eugenics, and is a very risky process.…
Limitations of this study include the lack of generalization of this study because of the use of a homogenous population. The authors of the study did account for this as they were trying to develop a screening tool. Another limitation includes the screening tool itself as it is specific to this study. In the development of the screening tool it was more likely that the cross validation group would test positive for drug use when compared to the developmental group. Further investigation of the tool involves the order in which items are administered to the research subjects as this is known to alter results. A great strength of the study is the use of urine and hair samples to help substantiate the use of the indirect screening tool. This standard demonstrated that drug use during pregnancy is more likely to show drug use outside of…
There are many high-priority health issues otherwise known as Leading Health Indicators (LHIs) selected by the Healthy People initiative to improve the health of all Americans (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [DHHS] (2017a). These LHIs encompass every aspect of a person’s life from pre-conception through old age along with actions that can be taken to help the Healthy People initiative attain their set goals. The public health topic that I have chosen to discuss is substance abuse in the perinatal period. This interest falls under the Maternal, Infant, and Child Health (MICH) topic, specifically MICH-11.4 Increase abstinence from alcohol, cigarettes, and illicit drugs among pregnant women which also corresponds with MICH-8.1 Reduce low birth weight (LBW) and…
Many of them try to quit because they want a healthy baby but experience withdrawals which prevent them from quitting using. Women who are stable in methadone maintenance programs will give birth to babies who are in normal range for development and will grow up to be healthy (“Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) about Methadone and Pregnancy”, n.d.). Scientific consensus by the US government authorities and researchers report methadone is safe and effective for managing opioid dependence during pregnancy (“Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) about Methadone and Pregnancy”, n.d). Although there are side effects in the early stages of treatment, the side effects end and there is no evidence of any long-term consequences. A review of the program stated “It has been shown to be an invaluable and often an essential ingredient in bettering the health of women during pregnancy”(“Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) about Methadone and Pregnancy”, n.d.).…
Should people who want welfare be required to take a drug test? People say the fourth amendment protects them because it states “ unreasonable searches and seizures.” Welfare drug testing is a common way to make sure taxpayer dollars are used responsibly. People who have to pay for other people’s welfare because they can go into work disagree with people who even have to think twice about drug testing being required to receive welfare. Taxpayers who pay on welfare think the government is responsible to make sure that their money is being used correctly and to make sure that drug users don’t receive any funds from the state. Why should we support their drug use, if you want drugs you should be able to pay for your own needs. We shouldn’t support basically feeding into their drugs use and letting them slowly kill themselves. Instead we should provide rehabs and hospital treatments. We don’t need to lock the addict up we need to get them help because they’re cable of so much more than what their setting their mindset do. They’re putting a limit to their goals and success in life. You can do…
Parents who work regular jobs and are required to pass a pre-employment drug screen are able to provide more for their children. Instead of spending their money on drugs or alcohol, they use it to buy items for their children. Sober parents have more money to buy food to make sure that their children are well nourished. Sober parents also have more money to buy items like books, coloring books, crayons, markers, or arts and crafts supplies which will all be assets to a child’s learning and development. Children of sober parents are more likely to be able to join groups or teams in schools also which will help them socialize. All in all, growing up with sober parents benefits children and can seriously affect their future positively. Growing up with parents who use illegal drugs could create a pattern throughout their children, and they could end up using drugs as well when they grow up. The Office on Child Abuse and Neglect, Children 's Bureau, ICF International states that, “Children who experience either prenatal or postnatal drug exposure are at risk for a range of emotional, academic, and developmental problems. For example, they are more likely to: experience symptoms of depression and anxiety, suffer from psychiatric disorders, exhibit behavior problems, score lower on school achievement tests, and demonstrate difficulties…
If a mother’s drug use is sustained through her pregnancy her baby may have effects that continue after birth. The prenatal drug exposure effects are widely ranged depending on the drug, amount, and length of time used during pregnancy. These babies may be born premature or have low birth weights. The withdrawal symptoms range from fussiness to severe irritability, jitteriness, feeding, and bowel issues. Long-term developmental problems may be seen in babies who are born with growth failure or various organ problems that will last throughout their lives (Lee, 2013).…
Companies want their employees drug free in order to receive a paycheck. Welfare recipients should also be drug free to receive their benefits. It is a normal part of life to be drug free. On the other hand, drug testing for welfare has its cons. To start with, some people may feel discriminated. Although there are many people who are drug tested in order to have a job, not everyone is. Making everyone eligible for welfare undergo drug testing could be considered discrimination against the poor, based on the assumption that they are a drug user just because they don’t make a lot of money. The biggest con against trust testing for welfare, is that if one loses their benefits, the child of the person will lose them too. By requiring drug testing of parents who are on welfare and not receiving direct benefits, there could be a lot of children who won’t receive benefits that they may rightly deserve under the law. Chances are if a parent is buying drugs, the child is not receiving the amount they deserve. If a parent can not manage their drug addiction, they may possibly put their child at risk for malnourishment, or even abuse. If that is the case, and a parent is unfit and incompetent, they should lose all…
A journalist of The New York Times Magazine by the name of Steven Pinker published an article titled, “The Moral Instinct.” The purpose of the article was to discuss morality and the questions and speculations around it. In the article, Pinker suggests that our moral goodness is just in our minds and is there to help us decide between what is right and wrong. He says that our moral goodness isn’t just an opinion-based conclusion, whether we favor or disfavor something. To Pinker, morality makes us feel like we have a purpose to live, and that that purpose solely comes from our loved ones. Pinker goes on to talk more about morality and poses many claims; claims that I have found very interesting. In further study of this article, particularly the claims Pinker brought up, I found some interesting texts that extend and complicate Pinker’s arguments as well as stimulate my thoughts about morality.…
A few of the reasons other people do not think we as a country should require a recipient of welfare and assistance from the government are its unconstitutional, children will bear the blunt, and drug addiction is a disease. The reason the people say it’s unconstitutional it is that a similar law has already been deemed unconstitutional in Florida, Oklahoma, and Michigan; for broadly subjecting all welfare applicants to a drug test violates the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures.…
When carrying a child it is important to get the right care and right nutrition to assure mother and baby are healthy throughout the whole process. While at home, the right amount of prenatal medication and nutrients can be consumed with no doubt. There are also books and online sources you can refer to while at home to get information on whats going on with your body. Also your doctor is just a call away if you experience any issues or have any questions during your pregnancy. Now imagine you are in jail. Its understandable you should have to do the time for the crime you commited. Your unborn child however, should not have to suffer your consequences. More then 2,000 children are born behind bars each year.(7) Pregnant inmate’s access to these kinds of resources are limited. They really do not know what is in their food, it probably is not the most healthy thing you could be eating. You can not access information about your pregnancy and the best you will be able to get for medical personal is the enfermery unless they decicde it is sereve enough to take to the hospital. Nothing is really your decsion in jail, if you are unfortunate enough to have to be pregnant in jail the least they could do is treat the women better. Given what we know about prenatal care, prisons should give better care to pregnant inmates.…