Persuasive Essay On Welfare Drug Testing
Welfare
Should people who want welfare be required to take a drug test? People say the fourth amendment protects them because it states “ unreasonable searches and seizures.” Welfare drug testing is a common way to make sure taxpayer dollars are used responsibly. People who have to pay for other people’s welfare because they can go into work disagree with people who even have to think twice about drug testing being required to receive welfare. Taxpayers who pay on welfare think the government is responsible to make sure that their money is being used correctly and to make sure that drug users don’t receive any funds from the state. Why should we support their drug use, if you want drugs you should be able to pay for your own needs. We shouldn’t support basically feeding into their drugs use and letting them slowly kill themselves. Instead we should provide rehabs and hospital treatments. We don’t need to lock the addict up we need to get them help because they’re cable of so much more than what their setting their mindset do. They’re putting a limit to their goals and success in life. You can do …show more content…
But it shouldn’t be stereotyped to only people who have a history of drug abuse. Because anyone could be a drug abuser but some people just got busted in their drug use earlier than others. Granting any financial assistance to the poor individuals with drug addictions, proponents contend, does little to help them. Giving financial aid is only enabling them. We shouldn’t pay for someone welfare because they choose to be lazy. If we can work they should work to, and if they choose to suffer than that’s on them. We shouldn’t have to get our paychecks shortened to pay some one who wants to not work. We got up and put the over time in so we could get some extra not to pay someone who wants to do nothing with their life. On the other hand opponents argue that drug testing is uncalled
Should people who want welfare be required to take a drug test? People say the fourth amendment protects them because it states “ unreasonable searches and seizures.” Welfare drug testing is a common way to make sure taxpayer dollars are used responsibly. People who have to pay for other people’s welfare because they can go into work disagree with people who even have to think twice about drug testing being required to receive welfare. Taxpayers who pay on welfare think the government is responsible to make sure that their money is being used correctly and to make sure that drug users don’t receive any funds from the state. Why should we support their drug use, if you want drugs you should be able to pay for your own needs. We shouldn’t support basically feeding into their drugs use and letting them slowly kill themselves. Instead we should provide rehabs and hospital treatments. We don’t need to lock the addict up we need to get them help because they’re cable of so much more than what their setting their mindset do. They’re putting a limit to their goals and success in life. You can do …show more content…
But it shouldn’t be stereotyped to only people who have a history of drug abuse. Because anyone could be a drug abuser but some people just got busted in their drug use earlier than others. Granting any financial assistance to the poor individuals with drug addictions, proponents contend, does little to help them. Giving financial aid is only enabling them. We shouldn’t pay for someone welfare because they choose to be lazy. If we can work they should work to, and if they choose to suffer than that’s on them. We shouldn’t have to get our paychecks shortened to pay some one who wants to not work. We got up and put the over time in so we could get some extra not to pay someone who wants to do nothing with their life. On the other hand opponents argue that drug testing is uncalled