Mathews Vs. Eldridge: Case Study
1. The purpose of this memorandum is to outline the important aspects of the case, Mathews v. Eldridge, and write a case brief using the FIRAC method.
2. FACTS: Eldridge was first awarded benefits in June 1968. He received a questionnaire in March 1972 from the state agency charged with monitoring his medical condition. He said his condition had not improved in the questionnaire and documented treatments he received and physicians who treated him. After the agency processed his paperwork, they determined that by letter, they determined his disability to have ceased in May 1972. Social Security accepted this termination and notified Eldridge that his benefits would terminate. As a result, he challenged this action and commenced the constitutional
2. FACTS: Eldridge was first awarded benefits in June 1968. He received a questionnaire in March 1972 from the state agency charged with monitoring his medical condition. He said his condition had not improved in the questionnaire and documented treatments he received and physicians who treated him. After the agency processed his paperwork, they determined that by letter, they determined his disability to have ceased in May 1972. Social Security accepted this termination and notified Eldridge that his benefits would terminate. As a result, he challenged this action and commenced the constitutional