Preview

Mauryan and Gupta

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
548 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mauryan and Gupta
Why was it more difficult for the Mauryan and Gupta dynasties to build and maintain a large territorial empire in India than it was for the Han Dynasty to do so in China? There are three simple factors that determine why the Mauryan and Gupta dynasties had a more difficult time than the Han Dynasty in building a large empire and maintaining it for long period of time. The three factors are the geographical location and topographical zones, the religion and belief system, and the social structure/status of the people.

The Mauryan and Gupta is located in modern day India. India is a peninsula and a sub-continent isolated from the rest of Asia. India had terrains of mountains, foothills, plains, forests, and steppes. The India is dry and agriculture there relies on irrigation. While the Han Dynasty in China has more fertile land near river and had major irrigation systems such as dams to control flooding. It also is connected to the Silk Road which allows interaction with the Roman and Parthian Empires in order to exchange ideas while the Mauryan and Gupta Empires where isolated from this due to its geographical location.

The Qin who set up the foundation for Han Empire believed in legalism which was a strict code of law. Thus allowing a strong discipline military system. In contrast to that the Mauryan and Gupta Empire where Buddhist, Hindu, and Jainist who believed the in a non-violence way to approach things. Thus giving the Mauryan and Gupta empires a smaller number of people who could be legible for the military while the Qin could draft anyone giving them a larger army.

The Mauryan and Gupta had a caste system know as varna which divides people into social five categories. This caste system does allow the people to move up from their class because the people of the lower-class accepted this thinking that if they followed the rules of their class they will be reincarnated into higher class. Thus meaning keeping a large number of people where

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    APUSH outline

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages

    REASONS #1: Empires took advantage of specific skills and knowledge given to them. Han for silk weaving and Gupta for textiles.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty were different politically. The Roman Empire was founded on imported agriculture and didn’t have a set bureaucracy. While the emperor of Rome appointed some advisors the government lacked many institutions, such as a planned budget. Apart from the emperor and senate the Romans didn’t have other levels of government; because of this the farther reaches of the Roman Empire had more autonomy. The Han was founded on strict legalism and had a well organized bureaucracy. Even though the emperor had absolute power, institutions such as the Three Councilors of State and Nine…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han China chose the middle path between the two diverse methods of government and pursued the policies of administrative centralization and imperial expansion. In contrast, Imperial Rome centralized political and military power which coincided with the preservation of traditional republican offices and form of government. The Han government believed that the network of political alliances in the Zhou Dynasty caused chaos between states, but the tightly woven Qin dynasty diminished the reason for imperial family members the sustain the empire. Han China was preferably divided into administrative districts that were governed by officials. These officials reached the emperor’s expectations, but allowed his authority over them while the bureaucrats implied his policies. Although, original forms of governing were adjusted in both places; the military responded directly to the emperor or ruler to avoid the problems caused by generals commanding personal armies. Imperial Rome progressed, from a previous dictatorship, by fashioning a centralized political government and unifying military power. Imperial Rome, in comparison to Han china, handled governmental functions with more concern. The Roman Emperor accrued copious amounts of power for himself and took complete responsibility during these times.…

    • 514 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The political structure of both Han China and Mauryan/Gupta India were distinct because Han China focused…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both empires established effective centralized governmental control over their vast regions and huge populations. But the Chinese, in opposition to the Romans,…

    • 644 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman and Han Empires were the most powerful empires among the Classical Empires. Between the fifth century B.C.E. and the fifth century C.E., the Roman empire of the Mediterranean and the Han Empire of China were both influential powers of the Classical Asian and Mediterranean worlds. The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire were similar in their falls because they both fell to nomadic invaders, and because they both fell because of a decline in economic trade. The Han and the Roman Empires were different in their falls because the Han suffered from serious revolts whereas the Romans did not; also the effects of their falls were different because China was able to make a fairly quick comeback whereas Rome was never able to do so.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One major similarity between the administration policies of Han China and Imperial Rome was that both empires had very centralized governments. In China, the emperor had all the power. While there were smaller units of government, the emperor controlled everything within the empire. Han China’s government structure was modeled after its precursor, the Qin dynasty. The Han elaborated on the original structure, perfecting it. In Rome, the emperor was also the most powerful; however the Roman people had an illusion of power not seen in Han China. Although the emperor held the…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the empires lasted during the same time, they were located on completely different land areas. Rome had the Mediterranean, was hilly, with lots of rivers. Natural protections with their central location, and able to utilize their manpower resources of Italy. While Han China had rivers, plateau, deserts, mountains, was plain-fertile but needed…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han Chinese were more diplomatic and wanted to avoid conflict as much as possible. There mindset was to win battles without fighting. Instead of using military and legions to defend their borders. They used walls and diplomacy to get other enemies away from attacking their borders. The romans though were a very attack mentality kind of military. They were very organized and had a lot of legions. They would use the citizens to sign up for the military. This was also a way to keep political control by making them sign up for the military. They used the legions and the military to defend their borders. A similarity though is that they both used roads and waterways for military access and trade routes. They could move the military easier from place to place. They could collect taxes and control trade. And also they could govern more effectively with use of messengers due to the…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though Imperial Rome and Han had very similar political structures their militaries were very different. Rome's military was used to reinforce laws, and was very strong and powerful, unlike Han china. In Han China, their military is mainly used for less important issues. The emperor in Imperial Rome headed the military, and in Han China, the emperor was not the only one heading the military.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han dynasty was the most influential dynasty in Chinese history and led to china becoming a country as we know it today. They extended Chinese rule from southern Mongolia to northern Vietnam and as far west as Nepal. One of the main reason for the prosperity and solidity of the Han dynasty was the relationship between the imperial family and the elite. Each group supported each other economically as well as socially, leading to a stable and prosperous empire.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire covered a lot of territory in Eurasia. From the year 1000B.C.E. (when the first settlement on the site of Rome occurred) to 600C.E. (just after the fall of both empires) the technological advances made were astonishing. Maps, pictures, and written documents are able to portray the details of what life was like in both of these large empires. All three of these will be used to explain how more technological inventions allowed these two empires to expand their control over the land. Although the Han Dynasty and Roman Empire were both large and powerful, it was mainly due to their technological advances.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, they both began to grow rapidly and out of control towards the end of their times because they could not support all of the people that were moving inside their walls. This must have been a hard time for them because they were doing to well until the time that because they were growing so rapidly they could not support all of their newfound citizens. Another similarity economically is that they both traded with other societies and because of this many things were passed on such as plagues. One of the reasons they both fell was because of plagues, the Romans had the Black plague while the Han had the Antonine plague. The last reason that they both fell was how they handled agriculture. On one hand the Han always had the promise of new land to peasants is they served in the war but after a while they started to run out of land that they would do and that made people very upset. These examples of defeat are helpful for us to know because enow we can use them and realize that with all of our new ideas and technology we don’t have to make the same mistakes that many ancient societies did that eventually lead to their…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All of these empires were able to survive and grow due to the environment they were presented in. They were able to find little loopholes that let them strive and develop into advanced societies which were all capable of overcoming the land. And so the success of these empires came from the ability to adapt and overcome the challenges the geography threw at them and the way they overcame it. It is important to remind ourselves…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Earlier in India social system of Hindus was predominantly based on the caste system which had arisen in ancient times. The caste system was one of the most important causes of social disunity. A large part of the population was considered by the people of higher castes as 'untouchable'. The life of the Hindus was regulated by the Dharma Shastras which prescribed different rights and duties for different castes. There were several social evil customs in the Hindu society. The status of women in the society was very bad.…

    • 2540 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays