Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Maximilien Robespierre, the Incorruptible Leader

Powerful Essays
1849 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Maximilien Robespierre, the Incorruptible Leader
George Washington's chopping of the cherry tree to the Holocaust of Adolf Hitler, historical figures are remembered for their actions as heroic or demonic. Maximilien-Francois-Marie-Isidore de Robespierre, the chief architect of the Reign of Terror and a bloodthirsty revolutionary democrat, was one such man that is now known as the incorruptible leader. Robespierre played a vital role in the Reign of Terror during the French Revolution. The Reign of Terror was a filtration to purge the streets of France of the enemies of the Republic, as Robespierre claimed. Instead, the Reign proved none other than a ruthless mass murder of the enemies of the Republic that was enjoyed as entertainment by the Republicans.

Maximilien Robespierre was born in Arras, a small provincial capital of Artois in France, on May 6, 1758. Jacqueline-Marguerite Carraut, daughter of a brewer and mother of Robespierre, died giving birth to her fifth child. Robespierre's father, Maximilien-Barthelemy Francois, then left his four children (one having died at child birth) under the care of relatives, leaving Robespierre almost an orphan at the age of eight.

Robespierre's talent of speech became evident in his youth when Robespierre was chosen to address King Louis XVI. It is said that when Robespierre finished his Latin oration, King Louis smiled at him. Robespierre would later make numerous speeches, supporting the equality of the people, claiming that "freedom of the press goes hand in hand with freedom of speech.(Rude 21)" Being popular among the commoners, Robespierre was one of the first to speak in favor of granting suffrage to all citizens. This shows that once Robespierre put his mind to something, he would remain dedicated to it and would stop at nothing to reach his goals. It is rumored that he also kept a copy of The Social Contract by his bedside, showing that Robespierre was as determined and faithful as those who keep a copy of the Bible by their bedside.

In 1765, Robespierre attended college at a local college in Arras, but was later transferred to the famous college of Louis-le Grand in Paris after people saw how intelligent he was. In Louis-le Grand College, Robespierre studied philosophy and law, coming under the influence of Jean Jaques Rousseau's theories of democracy and deism. This influence gave Robespierre his ways towards virtue and civic morality. When corruption spread throughout the French government, Robespierre refused to be affected by bribery or corruption. When he was elected deputy, he was exposed to millions of francs daily, yet he wasn't even tempted to take a single franc that he didn't work for. For Robespierre's honesty and trustworthiness, he earned the nickname "The Incorruptible."

After attending college, Robespierre joined the Breton Club, later the Jacobins, in May of 1789. Later, Robespierre became the head of the Jacobin Club and was appointed to the Committee of Public Safety, a committee that was created to spread the belief that the government is kind to the people, while, in truth, Robespierre was killing people by the thousands. During the Reign of Terror, Robespierre cared for no man. When the time arose, Robespierre condemned the once greatly respected King Louis XVI and his wife to the guillotine without hesitation. To Robespierre, "the right of punishing the tyrant and the right of dethroning him are the same things, (Rude 34)" in which Robespierre's statement justified the execution of Louis XVI as rightly done as overthrowing a tyrant.

With his ambition, Robespierre cared less for his friends and family, believing that he would always have the support of the people. Like Caesar, Robespierre tries to hide his ambition, as in his speech in the Jacobin club on April 10, 1791, "as if I were so foolish as to wish to destroy the type of government that best accords with the interests of a great people...jealous of the government of Poland. (Carr 156)" Robespierre wanted power and the support of the people; therefore he made numerous speeches about equality and freedom. As war broke out in France, Robespierre remains unconvinced that monarchy would be revived. Robespierre made a speech on May 17, declaring that war "was both an irrelevance and a diversion, and a course that had little hope of success. (Rude 158)" Robespierre's statement shows that he values the State more than he values the lives of the people.

Robespierre had always kept the belief that the Royals and the King were enemies of the revolution and people. In response to the war, Robespierre gave a speech as a warning, in which he sated "What does it avail us to conquer the kings if we are conquered by the vices that lead to tyranny?(Rude 163)" Robespierre argues that whether war leads to victory or defeat and its threat towards liberty. According to Robespierre's argument, victory in a war may present a greater danger than defeat.

Robespierre never changed his mind so drastically that he came to total rejection of a single idea. Robespierre revealed himself as a man of Enlightment in his speech on May 30, 1791, in which he sated that "the death penalty is fundamentally unjust...it is not the most effective penalties.(Loomis 246)" Robespierre stated that the death penalty would increase the amount of crimes instead of decreasing it. The guillotine was made to strike fear in the people, instead it cause revolts and unjust murders. As a prediction of the Reign of Terror, in which many were killed in public, Robespierre said that if people were tortured and murdered in public, "they will pervert in the citizens' minds all idea of what is just and unjust,(Loomis 246)" which would result in terrible prejudices and cause the people to turn against one another. The horror of a crime diminishes when its only punishment is another crime, daring others to commit more crimes. This results in a rise in the count of crimes. During the Reign of Terror, the only punishment for a crime again the revolutionaries was the loss of one's head, which caused the amount of people sent to the guillotine to increase.

Robespierre never despised the King nor had he loved the King. What Robespierre hated was the crime that Louis has committed. In Robespierre's speech on December 3, 1792, Robespierre stated that he abhors the law stating death penalties are legal as a punishment for a crime and that it is a crime to sentence a person to death. Robespierre then explains that death penalties "can be justified only in cases where it is necessary for the security of the person or the state.(Rude 165)" Robespierre saw the Kings as a threat to the State, so Robespierre declared that "Louis must die in order that our country may live.(Carr 137)" Robespierre stated that Louis was an exception that was allowed to be put to his death, but the Reign of Terror was more than just that.

Even the government was in danger of having its head chopped off if it showed any ill-will towards the Republic. In the summer of 1792, the enemies of the people were few, but during the Terror, assassins, intriguers, and traitors to the Republic's cause increased dramatically. Robespierre had believed that "to the enemies of the people it owes only death.(Carr 138)" The people are the Republicans, in which their safety are offered by society, and the remainder of the people are considered criminals and are sentenced to death. Though royalists and conspirators are not Republicans, they are considered strangers, rather than enemies, to the Republic. Robespierre tried to contain the thrist for blood of the Republicans in his statement, "cursed is the man who dares to inflict on the people the terror that is intended for the people's enemies!(Rude 167)" Unconsciously becoming a "cursed man" himself, Robespierre attempted to speed up the procedures of the Revolutionary Tribunal dealing with the enemies of the Republic; but for many of his colleagues, Robespierre showed mercy, believing that they were merely misled.

Robespierre had a sense of timing. He chose the right moments to carry out policies that had been agreed upon earlier by the State. Robespierre justified his means in his speech of February 5, 1794, that wisdom of the government is shown when "it should take careful note of circumstance, seize the right moment, and choose the means.(Rude 167)" Seizing the right moments is a type of tactical leadership, in which the timing is crucial for maintaining the support of the people.

Robespierre was a persistent watchdog of the revolution. He believed that once he lets down his guard, old ideas and habits would be revived and threaten the stop the Revolution and force it back to base one, the beginning. Robespierre warned the people in his speech on February 1794, "weakness, vice, prejudice are so many sign-posts leading back to monarchy,(Carr 201)" which states that old habit die hard. Unless these old habits are uprooted, they would cause chaos and destroy the Revolution from within. Robespierre sought to create an equal society, in which all Republicans had equal amount of both wealth and property to contain the new ideas. He suggested to "let the maximum of wealth be fixed...let no citizen own more than one workshop or...shop.(Loomis 189)" In addition to these restrictions, the limit to the amount of tools one can own was set too. This shows that Robespierre wanted a classless society in which all people were identical to one another, in terms of wealth and power.

Maximilien Robespierre is a memorable historical figure. His deceitful ways of killing many people, most of them which were probably innocent or didn't deserve the death that they received, ruined his good reputation. Robespierre is revealed as a potential tyrant seeking more power, though he hated other tyrants; but the fact that Robespierre was once an incorruptible leader proves Robespierre as strong willed and determined. By only remembering Robespierre's leadership skills and determination, not at the lives of the people that he destroyed, it shows that Robespierre knew what the people needed and how to keep his rule over the people. Many people after the French Revolution blame Robespierre for the lives lost during the Terror, but Robespierre is really a good man. Robespierre had spent most of his lifetime spreading the idea of revolution and equality for all, repaid only with death. It is said that people are remembered mostly for the bad things they do, not for their good qualities. Maximilien-Francois-Marie-Isidore de Robespierre is one such example.

~~~~

Carr, John Laurence. Robespierre the force of circumstance St. Martin's Press: New York, 1972

Loomis, Stanley. Paris in the Terror: June 1973- July 1794 J. B. Lippincott Company: Philadelphia and New York, 1964

Rude, George. Robespierre Protrait of a Revolutionary Democrat The Viking Press: New York, 1975

"SWL" Maximilian Marie Isadore Robespierre. 20 Feb. 2004

"Who2?" MAXIMILIEN ROBESPIERRE * Politician. 20 Feb. 2004

"Steven Kreis" Maximilien Robespierre, 1758-1794 20 Feb. 2004

"Richard Moore" Maximilien Robespierre French lawyer and politician 1758-1794 20 Feb. 2004

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    1794 Maximilian Robespierre was experiencing the negative repercussions of his creation. The French revolution changed the order of society and it came with a price. Prince Louis the 14th grandson Louis Capet married at age of 15 years old. The prince lacked of experience and social skills and leadership. The wedding was a political union between Austria and France. Marie Antoniette was 14 years old and was not interested in politics. Four years after the wedding Prince Louis the 14th dies leaving the throne to Prince Louis the 16th. He was not ready for the responsibility; he was only 20 years old.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First of all,the Jacobin leader ,Robespierre became very paranoid and killed thousands of people at the guillotine.That is to say because he and other people did not like the king so he killed anyone who he thought or heard was a supporter of the king or liked the king.Eventually he started killing anyone who he did not like or looked at him funny.As a result he was executine on jul.27,1794 after the committee of public safety placed him on the guillotine after killing around 40,000 people.Acording to the documents most of the…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robespierre Thesis

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Maximilien Francois Marie Isidore de Robespierre, also known as Maximilien de Robespierre, was born on May 6, 1758 in Arras, a city in France approximately 162 kilometers north of Paris. Robespierre was the oldest of four siblings, and his mother died when Robespierre was six years old. Shortly thereafter, his father left him, leaving his maternal grandparents to tend to the four children. The Robespierre family was a member of the Third Estate, which consisted of anyone in France that was not a noble and not a member of the clergy (administrators of the Roman Catholic Church). However, Robespierre earned a law degree from the Parisian Lycee (School) Louis-le-Grand, proving that he was a member of the highest class of the Third Estate.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reign of Terror DBQ

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “The King’s blood flowed and cries of joy from eight thousand armed men struck my ears.” A man that witnessed the guillotining of King Louis XVI was left with this graphic image of a memorable event leading to the Reign of Terror. The Reign of Terror, otherwise known as the French Revolution, was an attempt to form a new government in France. The citizens of France fought against their government and made a new government led by Maximilen de Robespierre. This new government executed large numbers of individuals whom were “enemies” of the Revolution. This government went so far to preserve their vision of liberty and equality. France was violently demanding “Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity”. Was it necessary to murder 30,000 by guillotining them in the middle of town square for everyone to witness? Did the 2,750 people sentenced to death without any evidence deserve their fate? The Reign of Terror was not justified because of the reaction towards external threats, the treatment of internal threats, and the malevolent methods used by this new government to carry-out their vision of a perfect government.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ: Reign of Terror

    • 656 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Not only was the Reign of Terror a big part of the French Revolution but it was a very unjustified event, creating sins among the people. They treated the dead as heads and bodies of simple animals rather than thinking of them as once humans. “Carried it mockingly, upside down on a cart, offering it to passers-by to spit on”(59). The people then went against the churches abolishing holidays which were important to many people and their beliefs. They also killed thousands, “many of these people were guillotined”(63). They would cut the heads of criminals and even innocent without trial. The guillotine began very popular through these months, becoming the number one way of killing. “The guillotine became one of the most powerful symbols of the French Revolution… It had a sharp, angled blade, which dropped quickly on a guided track”(65). These months were very gruesome for the people of france and many families, to where no one felt safe. These murders were sins, killed without reason or trial making the Reign of Terror unjustified.…

    • 656 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reign Of Terror Dbq

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Reign Of Terror was an unjustified part of the French Revolution. These hateful and vengeful acts led to an outburst of fear amongst the french people. What once started as a start to a new government led to an unexpected ruling of Maximilien Robespierre. Robespierre was the leader of the Public Safety Committee, and the reason king Louis XVI and many others were executed. He wanted to lead the french people to victory during this revolution, but the power corrupted him. Thus leading to the reign of terror and later his own death by the people.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Reign of Terror began because of the growing suspicion of common people supporting the nobles, and the monarchy. The first victim of this historic era was King Louis XVI, and he was most certainly not the last. Nine months later, Queen Marie Antoinette was too executed by the guillotine. The people were bound to their homes in fear of being accused of committing an offence, leading to arrest or death. Police spies were present all over Paris arresting both guilty and innocent, executing them because of pure suspicion. Some individuals were imprisoned or executed for having been wealthy, or talking to other people outside of their homes. (Doc. 6) This event ended with the beheading of Robespierre, one of the founders of the Reign of Terror, because suspicion became too disorderly and was destroying France as a whole. This mark in French history had to occur in order to show the nobles and the monarchs that they ( the people) weren't going back to the old society, where they had no say and were under unruly law. The founders of the revolution had to instill fear to ensure that the government wouldn't revert back what once…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Reign of Terror was a time when many people were getting executed by the guillotine for even the smallest of reasons. For example in Document 6 it talks about the impact that The Reign of Terror had on citizens in Paris in 1793. One thing is that it had people moving to the suburbs more because less people got executed from there because there were thought to be more hierarchies living out there. The Reign of Terror was led by Robespierre and the National Convention. He was thought to be protecting the French Revolution by creating this. After the French got rid of King Louis XIV and Queen Antoinette they had a leader from the Revolution become the monarch; his name was Napoleon. Another impact of the French Revolution and Napoleon’s reforms had on a nation outside France. The weakness of governments impacted the French Revolution and Napoleon’s reforms. Also, governments got overturned because people didn’t want an absolute monarchy.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He believed France could achieve a “republic of virtue” only through the use of terror. Robespierre was on the chief architects of the Reign of Terror, which lasted from September 1793 to July 1794. In order to try to bring about this change in government, revolutionary courts conducted hasty trials. Robespierre explained that terror was necessary to achieve the goals of the revolution. During the Reign of Terror, about 300,000 people were arrested and seventeen thousand were executed, all suspected of resisting the revolution.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Reign of Terror started with the onset of the French Revolution, and during this period of time anyone thought to be an enemy of the revolution was executed. Document 6 shows a picture of a public execution occurring with thousands of people watching. The primary method of execution was by guillotine and during the Reign of Terror this gruesome contraption took the lives of over 16,000 people over the course of 9 months. The Reign of Terror finally ended with the execution of Robespierre in 1794. When Napoleon seized power in 1799, many citizens saw it as a good thing. They believed France needed a strong leader, and Napoleon filled that description well. Napoleon believed that “To have good soldiers, a nation must always be at war.” (Document 8). He was a very strong military leader, and he always looked to achieve more military conquests. He won lots of crucial battles for France and was remembered as a great war…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ideals of the Enlightenment and the French Revolution were both rooted from the desire to abolish absolute authority, ensure the natural rights of men, and develop a stable government. Napoleon Bonaparte, a prominent military general and French Emperor, strived for these political ideologies, but was corrupt in his way of approaching them. He was strictly egotistical and selfish; these characteristics served only as a catalyst to his abolition. Mohandas Gandhi, a pacifistic revolutionary that led India’s emancipation, stated that “power based on love is a thousand times more effective and permanent then the one derived from fear of punishment”. Napoleon, however, seized control over France by ruling oppressively and ruthlessly; citizens followed him only in fear of his boundless power. Although Napoleon did help establish political and social equality in France, his uncontrollable desire for personal supremacy suppressed the ideals of the revolution and violated the basic principles of the enlightenment.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The “National Razor” or the Guillotine was used to kill many during the Reign of Terror. The Reign of Terror was the period during the French Revolution beginning in 1789 and ended in 1794. King Louis XVI was ruling France during this time. He was disliked by many while all of this was going on. Many people at home starved because of King Louis’ selfish decisions. Many people now ask, was the Reign of terror justified? This question has been out there for a while now. I believe the Reign of Terror was not justified because King Louis XVI was like a dictator, and left many people to live in poor conditions, many people died as a result under his rule.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reign of Terror

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Reign of Terror is the period of the French revolution since September 5, 1793, to July 27 1794. It was a civil and a foreign war, where the government decided to terrify the people of France, and to take harsh consequences against those who were against the revolution, like the nobles and priests. The government forced terror in the hearts of the French. Approximately 40,000 people die during the Terror. About 15% were the nobles and clergy. Another 15% were the middle class. The rest were peasants. The brain of the terror is the Guillotine. It was blade, which dropped fast, and the victim would not feel pain. Dr. Joseph Guillotine created the Guillotine, and it quickly became a symbol of horror in the Reign of Terror. Another method used in the period of Terror was The Breaking Wheel. The Breaking wheel was the famous execution before the Guillotine. The Breaking Wheel was a torture device where they attach a person to the wheel and rotate the wheel were his bones break and the person gets dehydrated. Drowning was also a method used in the French Revolution. Jean-Baptiste Carrier put his victims into vessels with trapdoors for bottoms and to sink them in the Loire River.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ‘Reign of Terror' was the name given to the actions of the ‘Committee of Public Safety' from the years between 1791-1794. Their actions can be justified, but can hold just as much criticism along with it. In my opinion, there could have been better ways to move the revolution along and the ‘Reign of Terror' should have never happened.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conversely, the First Nations view of the world and more specifically the criminal justice system is vastly different. First Nations view of the world is one of community, relationships, equality, and holistic views of harmony and balance (Monchalin, 2016). Professor Leroy Little Bear stated, “[i]f the whole is maintained, then beauty, harmony, and balance result” (Monchalin, 2016, p.40). This idea of complete harmony and balance was not only for each and every human, but in every aspect in life, such as the environment and animals. With these views and values the power would not be held at the top, as well as the competitiveness and individualized mentality would not be present.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays