Preview

Maximilien Robespierre's Rise To Power

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1794 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Maximilien Robespierre's Rise To Power
Maximilien Robespierre was a man with humble beginnings. Growing up in Arras, a small town in Northern France, Robespierre developed into the strong and prominent figure he grew up to be. Robespierre’s parents were not in the picture for the large majority of his rise to power. His father was a lawyer and his occupation influenced Robespierre to head down the same career path; Robespierre moved to Paris and received a degree in law from Lycée Louis-le-Grand. His rise to political success began with his consistent bashing of the standing French Monarchy in addition to his ability to fight for the common man in France which made up the Third Estate. Robespierre, once a man of the people became a man against the people toward the end of his life. …show more content…
Robespierre is alluding to the law of suspects which clearly stated “those who, by their conduct, associations, comments, or writings have shown themselves partisans of tyranny or federalism and enemies of liberty;” (Duvergier - The Law of Suspects). The law of suspects was a decree put into order by the Committee of Public Safety which Robespierre headed at the time. They created this decree because Robespierre felt vulnerable to outside pressure by not only other nations but also citizens of France. Robespierre’s newly implemented decree allowed authorities to incarcerate anyone who was heard speaking against the revolution or anyone even thought of going against the revolutionaries. The law of suspects took away natural rights which the revolution sought to restore after the failed monarchy headed by King Louis XVI. Robespierre’s men took in these suspects some were thrown in prison (estimate on wikipedia is that allowed), others were locked down on house arrest, and many unfortunately had to pay the ultimate price of death; This is terrorism. Merriam-Webster’s dictionary defines terrorism as the use of violent acts to frighten the people in an area as a way of trying to achieve a political goal. Robespierre’s actions by aiding the installation of the law of suspects and …show more content…
“In the early stages, the revolution spurred men and women to great flights of enthusiastic idealism, but it also generated enormous anxiety and mistrust.” (Bell - Terror at the Dawn of Modern Europe ). This quote proved to be very true during the French revolution. People across the nation were swept by a fear that they would be incarcerated or get killed for unlawful actions. The implemented fear upon the people is a form of terrorism. Terrorism in itself does not have to be an act taken upon a person but it is inflicting fear upon a group for your own gain. With the people of France scared and afraid of anything Robespierre could have done they began to obey him and respect him out of fear. Robespierre most likely took after Machiavelli’s style of leadership. Machiavelli emphasized the importance of being respected not through love but rather through fear and Robespierre was able to put that style of leadership to use and did it very well. Leaders all throughout the world have been influenced by Robespierre’s inherited style of leadership, one leader in particular is Bashar al-Assad. Bashar al-Assad has been the president of Syria since 2000 and his reign of power has been anything but kind to the people of Syria. Bashar’s leadership style which reflects the one of which Robespierre had, kept the people he ruled over in constant fear. The people of Syria have been

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    1794 Maximilian Robespierre was experiencing the negative repercussions of his creation. The French revolution changed the order of society and it came with a price. Prince Louis the 14th grandson Louis Capet married at age of 15 years old. The prince lacked of experience and social skills and leadership. The wedding was a political union between Austria and France. Marie Antoniette was 14 years old and was not interested in politics. Four years after the wedding Prince Louis the 14th dies leaving the throne to Prince Louis the 16th. He was not ready for the responsibility; he was only 20 years old.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Revolution it was one of the most controversial for terror and killed innocent people for any reason.they abused of the power they have for torture and take over their religion.However they do`t count with the people the trons around against the Revolutionaries so, the Jacobin leaders were power hungry Tyrants because of the events of the Reign of terror;beheading at the guillotine,the attempt to protect the Revolution and the proposal of a ‘Republic of virtues’…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robespierre Thesis

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Maximilien Francois Marie Isidore de Robespierre, also known as Maximilien de Robespierre, was born on May 6, 1758 in Arras, a city in France approximately 162 kilometers north of Paris. Robespierre was the oldest of four siblings, and his mother died when Robespierre was six years old. Shortly thereafter, his father left him, leaving his maternal grandparents to tend to the four children. The Robespierre family was a member of the Third Estate, which consisted of anyone in France that was not a noble and not a member of the clergy (administrators of the Roman Catholic Church). However, Robespierre earned a law degree from the Parisian Lycee (School) Louis-le-Grand, proving that he was a member of the highest class of the Third Estate.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reign of Terror DBQ

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “The King’s blood flowed and cries of joy from eight thousand armed men struck my ears.” A man that witnessed the guillotining of King Louis XVI was left with this graphic image of a memorable event leading to the Reign of Terror. The Reign of Terror, otherwise known as the French Revolution, was an attempt to form a new government in France. The citizens of France fought against their government and made a new government led by Maximilen de Robespierre. This new government executed large numbers of individuals whom were “enemies” of the Revolution. This government went so far to preserve their vision of liberty and equality. France was violently demanding “Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity”. Was it necessary to murder 30,000 by guillotining them in the middle of town square for everyone to witness? Did the 2,750 people sentenced to death without any evidence deserve their fate? The Reign of Terror was not justified because of the reaction towards external threats, the treatment of internal threats, and the malevolent methods used by this new government to carry-out their vision of a perfect government.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The identity of the unknown substance two was determined by three tests: solubility, thin chromatography, and the melting point. The following data was concluded based on solubility in water, isopropanol, and methanol: Aspirin was insoluble in both water and isopropanol and soluble in methanol. The unknown substance was insoluble for both water and isopropanol and soluble in methanol. In contrast, Acetaminophen was soluble in all three solutions and Diphenhydramine was soluble in water and methanol, but not isopropanol. Following the thin chromatography test, the Rf was found to be 0.64 cm.…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reign Of Terror Dbq

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Reign Of Terror was an unjustified part of the French Revolution. These hateful and vengeful acts led to an outburst of fear amongst the french people. What once started as a start to a new government led to an unexpected ruling of Maximilien Robespierre. Robespierre was the leader of the Public Safety Committee, and the reason king Louis XVI and many others were executed. He wanted to lead the french people to victory during this revolution, but the power corrupted him. Thus leading to the reign of terror and later his own death by the people.…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By increasing their legitimacy, the Committee of Public Safety removed the chance of a counter-revolution by publishing the “Law of Suspects” and executing all the defined enemies of the revolution within France. In the months after the Committee was commissioned by the National Convention, they “faced growing counter-revolutionary uprisings” (Law of Suspects). In response to these uprisings, the Committee took drastic measures and publishing a “Law of Suspects” which…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He believed France could achieve a “republic of virtue” only through the use of terror. Robespierre was on the chief architects of the Reign of Terror, which lasted from September 1793 to July 1794. In order to try to bring about this change in government, revolutionary courts conducted hasty trials. Robespierre explained that terror was necessary to achieve the goals of the revolution. During the Reign of Terror, about 300,000 people were arrested and seventeen thousand were executed, all suspected of resisting the revolution.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reign Of Terror DBQ

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Reign of Terror was unjustified because their punishments were inhumane. Even the littlest thing could get you to be killed. If someone didn’t like you or suspected something bad about you, it could get you killed. Many politicians didn’t agree with the ideas of Robespierre, so he had them be decapitated. The town of Lyons didn’t approve of the National Convention’s authority so “revolutionaries destroyed 1600 homes and chopped off 12 heads in five minutes (Doc.C).” It was a cruel way for Robespierre to get rid of them. The reign of Terror also took away the people's freedom. The people couldn’t really do anything without being watched or suspected of doing something against the government.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The French Revolution was a time of sweeping social and political change in France that kept going from 1789 until 1799, and was mostly conveyed forward by Napoleon amid the later development of the French Empire. The Revolution toppled the government, set up a republic, experienced fierce times of political turmoil, lastly finished in an autocracy under Napoleon that quickly conveyed a large number of its standards to Western Europe and past. Motivated by liberal and radical thoughts, the Revolution significantly modified the course of cutting edge history, setting off the worldwide decrease of outright governments while supplanting them with republics and liberal democracies. Through the Revolutionary Wars, it unleashed a rush of worldwide…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Maximilien de Robespierre became the most influential figure of the Revolution. Born in Arras, he was a lawyer, choosing to represent the lower class, before becoming a politician. His role as a revolutionary began in 1789, when he was elected deputy of the bourgeoisie. He moved to Versailles, where he got involved with the Jacobin Club. He declares himself to be favorable to universal suffrage in 1971.…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was Robespierre Justified

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Terror that Robespierre helped to instate in France was a policy that was known to be horrific. Even though this ideology was violent in nature, Robespierre thought that it was completely justified. Robespierre made very clear that the interests of the Republic were of utmost importance. He described how there were both internal and external forces working to dismantle the Republic, and that the supporters of the Republic should value reason while the Republic's enemies should experience terror. He made a point that terror in this case was not about intense fear as the word's definition implies, but rather stern justice toward those who did not support his policy. This description embodied Robespierre's concept on terror during this time,…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Reign of Terror was a moment in french history that began in 1793 and ended a year later in 1794. The Reign of Terror was just like how its name sounded; terrifying. Robespierre began the reign of terror the moment the french king, Louis XIV, was guillotined. He claimed that the only way to go through with the french revolution was to rid France of all their enemies and potential threats by beheading them at the guillotine. People may wonder if the Reign of Terror was even justifiable, stating that the French Revolution would have gone through successfully without it, but in all actuality the Reign of Terror was justified by France’s internal and external conflicts along with newer humane methods of ending people’s lives.…

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1792, French adversaries were pushing in on all borders and spies were rampant on the streets. To defend from internal enemies, prominent French leader Robespierre enacted the Reign of Terror. Anyone suspected of aiding the enemy was swiftly put on trial and executed. (doc. G) The Reign of Terror was not justified because the threats to France externally and internally did not warrant the methods used.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At first, Robespierre wasn’t that bad of a guy. Supporting the abolition of slavery and opposing the death penalty, he was an eloquent lawyer who just happened to have the bad luck to be born into Revolutionary France. His rise and fall from power can be analyzed in any number of ways, but what I am most curious about is what exactly caused the shift in Robespierre’s mental and emotional state which resulted in the brutal execution of 40,000 of his own citizens. Could he sense the shift? Was he helpless to stop his changing attitudes, so hypnotized by the lure of power that he was willing to do anything to keep it? Or did he know what was taking place, the horrors that he was committing, and did he continue to commit them for his own pleasure? Since he is not alive, killed by the very reign of terror he conceived, I think about it.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays