Preview

Mc Kinsey Matrix

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
830 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mc Kinsey Matrix
10/13/2010

GE _ McKinsey Matrix

QuickMBA / Strategy / GE-McKinsey Matrix

GE / McKinsey Matrix
In consulting engagements with General Electric in the 1970's, McKinsey & Company developed a nine-cell portfolio matrix as a tool for screening GE's large portfolio of strategic business units (SBU). This business screen became known as the GE/McKinsey Matrix and is shown below:

GE / McKinsey Matrix Business Unit Strength High High Medium Low

Medium

Low

The GE / McKinsey matrix is similar to the BCG growth-share matrix in that it maps strategic business units on a grid of the industry and the SBU's position in the industry. The GE matrix however, attempts to improve upon the BCG matrix in the following two ways: The GE matrix generalizes the axes as "Industry Attractiveness" and "Business Unit Strength" whereas the BCG matrix uses the market growth rate as a proxy for industry attractiveness and relative market share as a proxy for the strength of the business unit. The GE matrix has nine cells vs. four cells in the BCG matrix. Industry attractiveness and business unit strength are calculated by first identifying criteria for each, determining the value of each parameter in the criteria, and multiplying that value by a weighting factor. The result is a quantitative measure of industry attractiveness and the business unit's relative performance in that industry. quickmba.com/strategy/…/ge-mckinsey/ 1/4

10/13/2010

GE _ McKinsey Matrix

Industry Attractiveness The vertical axis of the GE / McKinsey matrix is industry attractiveness, which is determined by factors such as the following: Market growth rate Market size Demand variability Industry profitability Industry rivalry Global opportunities Macroenvironmental factors (PEST) Each factor is assigned a weighting that is appropriate for the industry. The industry attractiveness then is calculated as follows: Industry attractiveness = factor value1 x factor weighting1 + factor value2 x factor

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Str-581 Week 4

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Distinguishing one 's firm from the alternatives is a major concern for any business. Strategic analysis provides the starting point in the strategic management process organizations use to evaluate and choose the competitive advantages that distinguish them from other organizations within the market. Dominating businesses should also "choose among alternative grand strategies to guide the firm 's activities, particularly when they are trying to decide about broadening the scope of the firm 's activities beyond its core business (Robinson & Pearce, 2009)."…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Individuals and organizations are alike in many ways. Each has competitors and each should plan for the future. Each and every organization faces opportunities and threats and has some internal strengths and weaknesses.…

    • 2739 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    An essential part of corporate strategy is choosing the right portfolio of business to compete in especially when it concerns growth strategy and over the years this has become one of the key challenges faced by managers. It is highly imperative for business leaders to understand the different strategic options suitable for operating in various types of industries or markets. Suffice is to say that the business environment, which includes the competitive activity also plays a deep-seated role in deciding which strategic choice is most appropriate for the company or firm.…

    • 2418 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Walt Disney Strategy Case

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Below is the nine-cell industry attractiveness-competitive strength matrix. The x-axis is labeled as competitive strength/market position and the y-axis represents industry attractiveness. The way I determined the relative size and position of each of Disney’s five main business lines mentioned in the case was by first completing a weighted competitive strength score for each of the business lines. Additionally, figures provided in the case showed the revenues of each business line, which directly contributed to how big each circle was. It is evident from the…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated Bibliography

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Bert D. R. & Zeger Z. (2010) Business Strategy review, More Important Then Results 21(2), 81-83…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Imagine that you're reviewing your organization's products. You need to decide which ones you should focus investment on.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case 16 Sara Lee Corp

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4. What does a 9-cell industry attractiveness/business strength matrix displaying Sara Lee’s business units look like?…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Qsp Matrix

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages

    the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) Matrix is a simple tool to assess a company’s position in terms of its product range. It helps a company think about its products and services and make decisions about which it should keep, which it should let go and which it should invest in further.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is a management tool that serves four distinct purposes (McDonald 2003; Kotler 2003; Cipher 2006): it can be used to classify product portfolio in four business types based on four graphic labels including Stars, Cash Cows, Question Marks and Dogs; it can be used to determine what priorities should be given in the product portfolio of a company; to classify an organisation’s product portfolio according to their cash usage and generation; and offers management available strategies to tackle various product lines. Consider companies like Apple Computer, General Electric, Unilever, Siemens, Centrica and many more, engaging in diversified product lines. The BCG model therefore becomes an invaluable analytical tool to evaluate an organisation’s diversified product lines as later seen in the ensuing sections.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bcg of Kfc

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The need for strategy, in order to expand its existing product in very promising markets for KFC is very essential. KFC, along with McDonalds, and other major fast food chains have dominated the American continent as well as else where. Since the1950’s when the founder of KFC had a dream, of building an empire in the fast foodmarket, the company has undergone lots of changes. The company has changedownership; it has taken over from Pepsi and passed over to Tricon, which owns Pizza hut,Taco bell and others. Nowadays, KFC, still dominates the chicken fast food industry while has stores inmore than 100 countries operating vast profits. (De Witt 'et al.2004a) Although, due toincreased conditions of life, and differentiation of the life style of the population aroundthe world, there is still a lots of room for expansion, especially in countries with large population, and high development rate. KFC using the BCG matrix and SWOT analysisto analyze what is the current position of the company and identify that the company hasthe potentials to growth in fast food market.In the late 1960s the Boston Consulting Group, a leading management consultingcompany, designed a four-cell matrix known as BCG Growth/Share Matrix. This tool wasdeveloped to aid companies in the measurement of all their company businessesaccording to relative market share and market growth.The BCG Matrix made a significant contribution to strategic management andcontinues to be an important strategic tool used by companies today. The matrix providesa composite picture of the strategic position of each separate business within a companyso that the management can determine the strengths and the needs of all sectors of thefirm. The development of the matrix requires the assessment of a business portfolio,which include an organization’s autonomous divisions ( activities, or profit centers).The BCG or growth- share matrix imposes a two- dimensional analysis…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How to use it This matrix helps companies decide what course of action should be taken given current performance. The matrix consists of four strategies:…

    • 1834 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sanofi Aventis

    • 6995 Words
    • 28 Pages

    Sanofi a global name in the pharmaceutical industry holds the 5th position in the Pharmaceutical industry of Pakistan. Sanofi Sanofi works on seven major therapeutic areas; namely: Cardiovascular, Thrombosis, Oncology, Central Nervous System, Metabolic Disorders, Internal Medicine and Vaccines.…

    • 6995 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Fabian Advertising

    • 2191 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Schoemer Karl G 2009, Change is Your Competitive Advantage: Strategies for Adapting, Transforming, and Succeeding in the New Business Reality, Churchville, PA, U.S.A.…

    • 2191 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Using Porter’s Five Forces, business strategy analysis was conducted to examine the industries in which the firms operated. For the analysis of the firms, SWOT model, competitive and corporate strategies were used. Next, accounting analysis was carried out to evaluate the firm’s key accounting policies and quality of disclosure. Potential red flags were then identified, and adjustments were made such that the financial statements better reflect the firms’ underlying business reality. With these adjusted financial statements, financial analysis was then performed. Time-series and cross-sectional analyses were conducted on the firms’ key financial ratios to assess their operating, investment and financial management. Finally, using the ratios calculated, analysts’ reports and other firm specific news as the basis for our forecasts of the firms’ growth, profitability and risks, prospective analysis was performed using the eVal software.…

    • 2994 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Analysis of Capitec

    • 1867 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Porter, M. E., et al. (1996). "From competitive advantage to corporate strategy." Managing the multibusiness company: Strategic issues for diversified groups, New York: 285-314.…

    • 1867 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics