Preview

McKinsey

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1038 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
McKinsey
McKinsey

1. Based on the information provided in the case, what kind of organizational structure does McKinsey use and why? How is it connected to its mentality type (type of company within the Bartlett & Ghoshal typology)?
Company has strongly embedded “One firm” structure, which relates to clients, employees and profits. They emphasise the individual consultant development, so called I-shaped consultants. It is team-based organisation with team-led sectors and segments. McKinsey’s have a system, developed over several decades, of professional principles, approach to serving clients, personnel policies, organization, ownership which enable firm workers to identify with the long-term goals of the institution. history and traditions of the firm have also cultivated values that encourage firm members to stick to policies that they might otherwise deviate from. All branches of a company combine a high degree of local autonomy with a one-firm policy. The manager of each office had broad operating responsibility and decision-making authority, but only within the limits of firm principles, strategy, and policies. According to the one-firm policy, all consultants were to be hired and promoted by the firm rather than by an office; partners' profit shares were derived from a firm pool, not an office pool; and each client was to be treated as a client of a company, not of a particular individual or office. I think that McKinsey is a transnational type of company, because its subsidiaries are relatively independent from the rest of the company, since they are bonded to the local environment, to which they have to be very attentive.
The transnational company is also described by Bartlett and Ghoshal as an integrated and interdependent network of various but equal units, where headquarters does not play a commanding role. Headquarters choose to control their subsidiaries

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Capstone Encyclopedia of Business (2003) defines, “the transnational firm is a network of specialized or differentiated units, with attention paid to managing integrative linkages between local firms as well as with the centre. The subsidiary becomes a distinctive asset rather than simply an arm of the parent company. Manufacturing and technology development are located wherever it makes sense, but there is an explicit focus on leveraging local know-how to exploit worldwide opportunities” (Para. 7).…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A TNC (transnational corporation) is a company that operates in no less than two countries and has a global outlook. TNCs have a long history going back to the 16th Century in terms of trade such as spices, but it’s not until C. 1945 that companies started to form acquisitions and mergers. The one key reason why these businesses have been so successful in their area of expertise globally is because they can take advantage of spatial differences in the factors of production worldwide. They are able to exploit differences in the availability of capital, labour costs and land cost, which we as a world have seen, especially in far-east Asia.…

    • 3262 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the things that happend to Mrs.Mckinsey over her years of teaching was when she was giving a leason in her old room.She said that her room was always cold and she had widows that weren’t sealed corectly.Somwhere between fall and winter she was giving a leason in front of the widows and began to notice water on her face and glasses.She wiped them off and continued teaching but it kept happening.The student began to notice and one told her that it was snowing in the class room.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A transnational company is one that spreads out their operations in many countries, sustaining to higher levels of local responsiveness than would likely be received by a multinational company which identifies itself with one national home and then maintains foreign subsidiaries.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Forsyth is a principal in McKinsey’s Stamford office; Alok Gupta is a consultant in the New York office; Sudeep Haldar is a consultant in the Chicago office; Mike Marn is a principal in the Cleveland office. Copyright © 2000 McKinsey & Company. All…

    • 2837 Words
    • 82 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Global Markets

    • 2020 Words
    • 9 Pages

    References: Hartman, C. (2013). Differences Between a Multidomestic & a Transnational Company. The Houston Chronicle.…

    • 2020 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robert Grosse* and Jack N. Behrman** International business has existed as a distinct field of study for the past three decades, but it does not have a widely accepted explanatory theory on which to base its uniqueness as a discipline. David Ricardo 's theory of comparative advantage, Raymond Vernon 's product life cycle, John Dunning 's eclectic theory and all others are essentially explanations of business between domestic firms or regions, as well as international firms. They explain "multidomestic" investment and intra-national trade. Those theories offer important insights into the functioning of firms in business anywhere, including international firms, but they fail to focus on the distinguishing characteristics of business operating among different nations. Since international business is the study of business activities that cross national borders and, therefore, is fundamentally concerned with the firms that undertake that business and the national Governments that regulate them, a theory that is unique to such business must explain the responses of businesses to government policies and the policy-making of Governments themselves towards international firms. Empirical studies have distinguished international from domestic business strategies and operations, but they have not resulted in an international theory of cross-national business behaviour. The lack of a proper theoretical focus has diverted the discipline from an emphasis on policy and on conflicts and cooperation among corporations and Governments. A framework for constructing such a theory can be built on existing bargaining theory.…

    • 9484 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Mckinsey method consists in a framework with 7 internal aspects of an organization that need to be aligned in order to improve its overall performance. Galbraith’s star contains a series of design policies, divided in 5 categories, that are controllable and can influence the employee’s behavior. The Mintzberg configurations try to define what structure is more adequate to each external situation and kind of companies, establishing 5 organizational types that contains factors that must “fit” properly for the organization to function well. Among these, in my opinion, the best model is the Porter’s Value Chain Analysis, because it is simple, objective and take in account the inputs and outputs of the system along with the activities that generate value for the consumer.…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Transnational Corporation (TNC) is a company which operates in more than one country. We refer to the country in which the company was started as the ‘home country’, and any other country that it is operating in as a ‘host country’. Globalisation can be described as the movement of people, money, resources, ideas, or culture across international borders; but can also be described as the process by which businesses or other organizations develop international influence or start operating on an international scale. TNCs have both positive impacts and negative impacts, on both the home country and the host country; but are they responsible for helping or hindering these nations?…

    • 948 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Bartlett, C., Ghoshal, S., & Beamish, P. (2008). Transnational Management (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin.…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This case discrbed the development process of McKinsey&Compay from 1926 to 1996. In particular, it focuses on the way in which McKinsey has developed structures, systems, processes, and practices to help it develop, transfer, and disseminate knowledge among its 3,800 consultants in 69 offices worldwide. Concludes by focusing on three young consultants operating in each dimension of the firm's organization--the local office, the industry practice, and the firm's competence center. So,…

    • 3251 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Over the years, many typologies of multinational companies (MNCs) have been developed. As such, Bartlett and Ghoshal (1989) provided the most extensive typologies regarding MNCs. Besides, Harzing (2000) uses a different division of the multinational companies and separates them in relation to organizational design and subsidiary role, local responsiveness and interdependence. The identified types are: Multidomestic, Global and Transnational (Harzing, 2000). Multidomestic typology combines high national responsiveness and domestic competition, implying that the company responds to national differences and has a decentralized structure, although scores low on global competition and economies of scale. In contrast, Global typology characterizes high global competition, economies of scale, and low national responsiveness, as companies tend to build cost advantages through economies of scale. Finally, the Transnational cluster combines both typologies focusing on economies of scale as well as national responsiveness. Verbeke (2009) describes four archetypes of administrative heritage, namely the ‘centralized exporter, ‘international projector’, ‘international coordinator’, and ‘multi-centred MNE’ which regard to a specific routine of internationally transferring FSAs. In comparison to Harzing’s (2000) typology, these four archetypes of administrative heritage describe how a company’s FSAs are internationally transferred and its location advantages, while Harzing’s typology discusses the types of MNCs and its measurement to various elements. In 1986, Bartlett and Ghoshal…

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Emirates Assignment

    • 3736 Words
    • 15 Pages

    In today’s competitive global market the success of multinational enterprises (MNEs) rely heavily on their differentiated geographically dispersed subsidiaries being fully or partially owned subsidiaries, regional offices, representative offices etc...…

    • 3736 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    . Bartlett and Ghoshal’s views about multinational network is that many MNEs do not let their subsidiaries to develop unique strengths in their own right and these centralized MNEs, strategic decision making and control just in home country headquarters, which will lead enormous bounded rationality and bounded reliability challenges. So they argue that companies can develop and exploit their present FSAs and support the development of new FSAs in their multinational subsidiary network by selectively decentralizing elements of strategic decision making and control. An organizational model of differentiate rather than homogenous subsidiary roles and of dispersed rathe than concentrated responsibilities. In this case,Tata Group manage its internal network which is also based on Bartlett and Ghoshal’s views about multinational network and each operating company is responsible for its own international strategy forming. It is also depending on the nature of the industry,opportunities of global stage. For example, Tata Sons established Tata industries…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Management Assignment Implication of McKinesy’s 7s model. The McKinsey 7S Framework _The Mckinsey 7s model ensures that all parts of the organization are in harmony. The 7s model consists of seven elements_ The Seven Elements The McKinsey 7S model involves seven interdependent factors which are categorized as either "hard" or "soft" elements: "Hard" elements are easier to define or identify and management can directly influence them: These are strategy statements; organization charts and reporting lines; and formal processes and IT systems. "Soft" elements, on the other hand, can be more difficult to describe, and are less tangible and more influenced by culture. However, these soft elements are as important as the hard elements if the organization is going to be successful. The way the model is presented in a way shown on the next page. _ {draw:frame} _ Strategy:_ the plan devised to maintain and build competitive advantage over the competition. _ Structure:_ the way the organization is structured and who reports to whom. _ Systems:_ the daily activities and procedures that staff members engage in to get the job done. _ Style:_ the style of leadership adopted. _ Staff: the employees and their general capabilities. Skills:_ the actual skills and competencies of the employees working for the company. _ Placing Shared Values in the middle of the model emphasizes that these values are central to the development of all the other critical elements. The company's structure, strategy, systems, style, staff and skills all stem from why the organization was originally created, and what it stands for. The original vision of the company was formed from the values of the creators. As the values change, so do all the other elements. Strategy: Exporting will be increased in order to deal with domestic surplus. To overcome the problem of supply deficit not demand deficit. Outsourcing in order to…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays