Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Media Spin

Satisfactory Essays
816 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Media Spin
Halili 1
Meer Halili
Mrs. Grant
English
February 11, 2013
We are free to be you, me, stupid and dead
The Free-speech Follies For my english class, we are discussing, how far does the First Amendment let us go and how do people use it to get out of theMrs. Grantir situations? Based on my reading of two different essays issued with The First Amendment rights, i read: an essay tittled, "We Are Free to Be You, Me, Stupid, and Dead", that comes from Roger Rosenblatt's essay collection called where we stand :30 reasons why we love our country, and an essay from Stanley Fish, tittled "The free speech, Pollies", where he argues that the first Amendment rights is offen used on college campuses to speeches that are not enforced. In his essay, Journalist and author from New York city, Roger Rosenblatt, explains the situation of many people whom the First Amendment Rights were "taken away" and discusses how far can we go with the freedom of speech? but on the other essay, Stanley Fish, an author of literature and law, arguess the issue of how offen people use the First Amendment Rights to get out of their situations, knowing that their situation is not connected to the First Amendment Rights.

Halili 2
However, Rosenblatt and Fish notice the issues that connect people with the First Amendment Rights and how far people sometimes can go with it. They both see the First Amendment Rights not being used when needed to be used, and taken place when not suppossed to. For example, Rosenblatts talks about the issues that some celebrities have had to face because of the First Amendment Rights have not taken place and caused them loss of jobs. He claims that a basketball player Mahmoud Abdul-Rauf was suspended from the Basketball league for not willing to stand up for the national anthem because of his religious convictions. The same issue was reported for the baseball pitcher, John Rocker refused to ride New York's number seven subway with a certain people. In both cases, they have the freedom of expression ofthe First Amendment rights. He also believes that freedom of speech can go to far and out of limits for others. He talks about the banning of many books that libraries have had because of their challenging for giving different portrayes to students. He interviewed some executives of the company called "how do they live with themselves?" which they gave a positive answer "because of the freedom of choice"(484). In Virginia they banned a book called Hittler's hang-ups because of "explicit sexcual details of Hitler's life"(485). On the other hand, Fish talks about how the First Amendment Rights are used too much on college campuses to defend speeches that it was not created to defend. In some cases, Fish talks about the First Amendment Rights being used when there is no cause of it. Many students have had their published newspapers
Halili 3 turned out to be a major controversy; therefore they cry out for First Amendment rights to get out of such issues. Fish talked aobut a newspaper from a student stated that president should "seperate Jews from all government advisory positions"; so they do not face another Holocaust.When the students faced arguments because of it, they tried backing up their newspapers by using the First Amendment rights, which it can protect something you say but it doesn't protect a speech given out to the public. After reading these essays, I have realized how the First Amendment Rights are being misused. In Rosenblatt's case, celebrities are losing their great job position by being suspended from their athletic league because of their free expression of how they feel about some things when they Constitution does not say anything about not willing to practice other religious in the the First Amendment Rights. These articles have made me notice how important is to use the the First Amendment Rights in the right situation to avoid the cause of convinctions. I have also have a better understanding of when i can use these rights and how far I can go with them. In conclusion, I see the First Amendment rights being very beneficial to us. We should knowledge that many other countries do not have these rights we have; therefore their rights are limited. They can not say whatever they want. But, we need to know how far we can go with them. I totally disagreed with Fish's essay when he tells his story of students being stereotype and using the First Amendment Rights for this that it does not defend.
Halili 4
Works cited Rosenblatt, Roger. "We are free to be you, me, stupid and dead." Where We Stand: Thirty reasons for loving our country 2002: 483- 86. Fish, Stanley. "The Free-speech Follies" Chronicle of Higher Education 2003: 496- 500.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The point of the First Amendment is for Americans to be able to express disagreement without fear of reprisal. Men and women of this country have been trained for their voices to be heard. Real life problems are often resolved through negotiation. This is stated on pages 1 and 2.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For my presentation, I reported on the Falwell vs. Flynt lawsuit, which was based upon the extent to which Americans have freedom of expression. An important aspect of this case was the dissimilarity of the two men involved: Jerry Falwell and Larry Flynt. Jerry Falwell was an important religious leader of the time. He was a radio evangelist, leader of a religious group called the moral majority, and voted 2nd most influential person in America (the first being the president). Falwell represented a pure America, a decent society in which its members were committed to moral standards. Larry Flynt was his complete opposite. Flynt was editor of the infamous Hustler…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Almost all of the rights protected by the First Amendment are governed by the same legal standard, developed in a case called Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987). In Turner, prisoners in Missouri brought a class action lawsuit challenging a regulation that limited the ability of prisoners to write letters to each other. The Supreme Court used the case to establish a four-part test for First Amendment claims. There are four questions that are asked using this test: 1. Is the regulation reasonably related to a legitimate, neutral government interest? 2. Does the regulation leave open another way for you to exercise your constitutional rights? 3. How does the issue impact other…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    A Fight for Freedom for Journalists “A First Amendment Blind Spot” was published in The Wall Street Journal by Theodore J. Boutrous Jr. The author is a partner of the Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher LLP. He is also the co-chair of the International Women’s Media Foundation. Moreover, he was denominated by the National Law Journal as one of 100 most influential lawyers in America (“Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., JD Biography”).…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    As Walker put it “The American Civil Liberties Union was a unique organization….In contrast, the American Civil Liberties Union adopted the policy of impartially defending civil liberties, including the principle of free speech, without reference to the content of that speech” This comes at a time when “the Supreme Court had soundly rejected all First Amendment claims.” (47)…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Protecting Freedom of Expression on the Campus”, the author, Derek Bok shows how expressing yourself falls under the First Amendment, whether it is on a private college campus or public college campus. He further explains that just because it is protected by law does not mean that it is “right, proper, or civil. Bok goes on to show how censoring freedom of speech would cause people to “test the limits” to gain more attention than is needed and if dealt with in the proper manner, behaviors such as displaying a Confederate flag or a swastika in rebuttal of the flag can be avoided. Freedom of expression is a right and should not…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Have you ever felt like a piece of cheese on a mouse trap just waiting for that mouse to come by and eat you; maybe even a fly stuck in a spider’s web hoping that you can get away? Well I am sure if I had been one of those people in the mist of the chaos on September 11, 2001 that had changed the life of all Americans’ across the country. I would have felt no bigger than that piece of cheese or that fly caught in the web. We were victims of a horrific terrorist attack that shook the very core of our foundation as a country. Twelve years later we are still recovering from this horrendous act. We have been fighting the war on terror for ten years. This is one of the longest wars that the United States has ever fought. While the war rages on the boundaries between national security and civil liberties are blurred. “The big threat to America is the way we react to terrorism by throwing away what everybody values about our country—a commitment to human rights” (Kennedy, 2007). Individual liberties and freedoms are important since without them one can be held indefinitely. Habeas corpus does not infringe upon a person’s civil liberties. In addition, habeas corpus allows an individual to question why they are being detained and ensures that detainees have a right to a fair trial; it is considered to be one of the foundations of constitutional democracy.…

    • 2236 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment is all about your rights and how these are used in the world today. The "clear and present danger" test is a basic principle for deciding the limits of free speech. It was set by the famous Schenck v. the United States case from World War I. Anti War activist Charles Schenck was arrested for sending leaflets to prospective army draftees encouraging them to ignore their draft notices. The United States claimed that Schenck threatened national security, and the justices agreed. The principle was established that free speech would not be protected if an individual were a "clear and present danger" to United States security.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After years of appealing to the Supreme Court, they finally ruled in his favor. The Supreme Court declared that the Minnesota Law was the “essence of censorship,” and violated Nears First Amendment right to freedom of the press. During the 1920’s and 1930’s, the Supreme Court took serious action to protect citizens of the United States from State action against their free-expression rights. The Supreme Court stated that “free-expression rights were more deserving of federal protection because they are the “indispensable condition of nearly every other form of freedom,” We the People, pg.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the first amendment of the Bill of Rights, it clarified that all citizens of the United States have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. A democracy is a “government by the people”, if the government respects the freedom of speech, of the press, and of association, the 1st Amendment guarantees these freedom from the citizens, which is an important part of…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and freedom of expression from government interference. This is one of the most important amendments in the constitution and is what America is most proud of. However, these rights aren’t all they are cracked up to be. For example, censorship is very common and goes against the freedom of speech. Censorship has many different roles in society both in the past and present. In the past it was used as a way for dictators to control their people and keep them from reading rebellious literature. Hitler even burned all books that he did not like.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The matter up for interpretation was whether or not the signs and comments from the Westboro Baptist Church were speaking on “matters of public concern.” They analyzed the content, form, and context of the speech to decide if it related to any matter of political, social, or other concern to the community. The Supreme Court said that, because the picketers were on public land, adjacent to a public street, and the overall theme of their speech was related to broader public issues, Phelps and the other picketers were speaking on matters of public concern and were entitled to protection from the First Amendment. This was decided in an 8-1…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hornberger, Jacob. G. The bill of rights (2005). Retrieved on January 30, 2010 from http://www.fff.org/freedom/fd0503a.asp…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    law assignment USA

    • 1767 Words
    • 6 Pages

    (a) Why are these comparisons important? Briefly explain the differences between libraries, television, and public places with respect to First Amendment protection.…

    • 1767 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many individuals and groups alike that choose to express their disdain for certain actions, laws, and behaviors through the use of Freedom of Speech. The First Amendment has been cited by many protesters when demonstrating that it is their right to Freedom of expression. Freedom of Expression is powerful enough that sometimes words do not have to be spoken for a message to be conveyed. However, not all acts are protected by the First Amendment. For example, burning the flag is protected under the First Amendment but promoting the benefits of marijuana at a school event would be protected (U.S. Courts, n.d). If by chance there is a question of constitutionality regarding the First Amendment, it is usually linked to the overbreadth doctrine. Simply meaning, an individual may feel that their rights and/or others rights to Freedom of Speech may be prohibited by laws when applied under the context in which they were written. Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601 (1973) is the most quoted case that addresses issues of the overbreadth doctrine as it pertains to the First Amendment.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays