Preview

Summary Of Derek Bok Protecting Freedom Of Expression On The Campus

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
587 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary Of Derek Bok Protecting Freedom Of Expression On The Campus
Aleshia Ledbetter
WR 121, 9:30am
April 7, 2011
Summary of “Protecting Freedom of Expression on the Campus” In “Protecting Freedom of Expression on the Campus”, the author, Derek Bok shows how expressing yourself falls under the First Amendment, whether it is on a private college campus or public college campus. He further explains that just because it is protected by law does not mean that it is “right, proper, or civil. Bok goes on to show how censoring freedom of speech would cause people to “test the limits” to gain more attention than is needed and if dealt with in the proper manner, behaviors such as displaying a Confederate flag or a swastika in rebuttal of the flag can be avoided. Freedom of expression is a right and should not
…show more content…
It is an insensitive act; although it is their right to do so. According to the Supreme Court’s ruling, the displaying of these symbols is protected under the First Amendment. Regretfully, people act and react because they are offended by things like this, but it is one of our many freedoms as Americans. Although it cannot be prohibited it should be responded to in such a way they do not feel put down or that they are wrong in expressing themselves, but rather suggest to them that it is hurtful and offensive to others. We have the right to be offended as others have the right to display or express their own interests. Diverse communities in the United States set certain laws to protect their properties from being vandalized with graffiti and protect them from loud noise; rules of this kind should be evenly upheld in order to not discriminate for or against anybody’s opinions or ideas. If the governing authorities see fit to change the laws to prohibit such expressions, they should be cautious, because censoring such a great freedom can potentially become “dangerous”. When one or more people feel that they are being pushed in the opposite direction than what they feel is right they tend to rebel in a sense. More often than not they will try to push the boundaries to prove that they are free to do as they see fit and the more attention that is given to their cause the more they will show that they will not be told

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The First Amendment protection for freedom of expression “consists of the rights to freedom of speech, press, assembly, petition the government for a redress of grievances, and the implied rights of association and belief” (www.law.cornell.edu). Though there are several components of freedom of expression “the most basic component of freedom of expression is the right of freedom of speech” (www.law.cornell.edu). The First Amendment states that the “right to freedom of speech allows individuals to express themselves without interference or constraint by the government”…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This article talked about how the students of UC Berkeley were protesting against a speech being given at their school, and how the sponsors of this group were forced to pay $15,000 in security fees. Then on top of that fee the school paid an additional $600,000 to create cemented barriers and have armed forces on campus during the meeting. Personally I feel these precautions were unnecessary however due to the way students were reacting it had to be done. Another subject brought up in the article was the fact that 44 percent of students said that the First Amendment does not protect "hate speech", 51 percent said that they would be in favor of students speaking out against a speaker "known for making offensive and hurtful statements" and 19 percent of students said the use of violence against controversial speakers is acceptable. This information frustrates me because freedom of speech is black and white, personal opinions shouldn’t interfere with our rights.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, the first amendment is taken advantage of in many ways. Many people express that they can say whatever they please because they have the Freedom of Speech. They might burn the USA flag, make a racist remark, or some other kind of action, but what they do not realize is that this may hurt people. The First Amendment should be limited so that individuals can speak their mind so long as it does not hurt other people, or violates their rights.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was Bill's freedom of expression rights violated in this case? Why or why not? Bill's freedom of expression rights was not violated in this case because the school had already initiated a policy prohibiting the wearing of any gang symbols, which included earrings. "Gang members tend to wear specific apparel or colors to convey gang affiliation" (Essex, 2012, p. 114).…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He goes on to discuss the fact that the display of these flags triggered a lot of controversy on the university campus, over the freedom of speech. He recalled that some of the students expressed that school administration should not allow the symbols because they are offensive to others. He asserts that some of the students felt the flag was the representation of oppressive and deeply unpleasant time in American history. He also mentions the students who felt that the symbols represented free speech and should be allowed.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first amendment states that only if a person’s speech has substantial interference with school discipline or the rights of others it may be censored. Most people take that how it is supposed to be taken. If you actually read the law, it is easy to see that many things…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Amendment states that “Congress cannot make laws that violate Americans' basic freedoms, including freedom of speech”. Social Studies Alive, 317. This shows that the government provides individuals with the right not to be censored if it is appropriate and not disruptive. “The First Amendment protects citizens’ rights to speak out against the government. These students are exercising their right of freedom of speech as the Supreme Court considers a case involving freedom of speech in schools.”…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Women, sexual assault victims, people of color, transgender students. College campuses have created “safe spaces” for all sorts of marginalized groups. But in the process, one member of the campus community has lost precious real estate. Free speech” (1). This quote from the article “Free Speech is Flunking Out on College Campuses” by Catherine Rampell introduces the idea that the right to freedom of speech is being squashed. All over the country, colleges are taking away this right from their students in order to protect others, but in reality, they are only stripping them of what is protected under the Constitution. Censorship has spread to social media apps causing students to be in constant danger of being accused of harassment. Claims…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    states his many interpretations of the actual meaning of the First Amendment. Universities all over the Untied States are finding it difficult to clarify the controversy over free speech. Bok 's purpose in writing the essay is to bring out the differences between free speech and offensive material such as the display of Confederate flags and Swastikas, which was the situation at Harvard University. This made students in the community uneasy and offended. Those who exposed the symbols argued that if they were forced to remove certain symbols, it was against their right to free speech and expression. 
Bok explains that many other colleges and universities have had to deal with accusations such as these. Many groups have responded negatively in enforcing restrictions was wrong and against the First Amendment. The fact of the matter is that the students that are uncomfortable with displaying such images as a Confederate flag or a swastika, clearly out numbers the amount of students that find pride in such a thing. The students must have known that retaliating by exposing the swastika would result in upsetting others at the university. Bok explains that the U.S has been struggling with complications to the free speech rights. It’s an issue of whether to honor the freedom of speech completely or only to focus on developing a nation built on mutual respect.Works Cited…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mascots to Be Banned

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    What is considered offensive? Is it considered offensive to use obscenities around children? According to many people in the United States, it is sport team names and mascots that depict a certain group of people are considered offensive. People around the United States are trying to get professional sport teams to change their names and mascots because they feel it depicts their certain race in bad way. Teams should have to change their mascot and their name if they are named after a certain group of people.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bias Rhetorical Analysis

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I get that some people get offended but every single person is entitled to there own right and for them to say that it was wrong is not right. People might get offended and that can happen but when they are supporting a cause like cancer which the author says they were supporting is wrong to get them in trouble for that so that is why I think that the author is biased. “two middle­school girls were wrongly suspended for wearing the bracelets as part of a breast cancer awareness campaign promoted by the Keep A Breast Foundation.”…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People should have freedom to say what they want to say, for what they believe in.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Essay On Flag Desecration

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Flag desecration is intended as a political statement against our government and to evoke an emotional response fueled by a personal agenda. In reality, the American flag represents our country and not our government, along with the men and women of the armed forces, police forces, and firefighters that died in the line of duty. Even though flag desecration is protected under the First Amendment, it is still widely considered to be an insult and disrespect to anyone who has ever received our American flag from the passing of a loved one. Flag desecration should be made illegal and disregarded as a form of free speech because it's a misinterpreted form of political expression, it inherently dishonors and disrespects every person ever buried underneath our American flag, and it is completely hypocritical act to burn the flag of a country that gives you the exact same freedom of expression.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first amendment clearly states that congress shall not make any law abridging the freedom of speech. If our government isn’t going to avid by the amendments, then why have them? If they are going to ban the confederate flag then they should be banned for not corresponding with our god given rights. The constitutional amendments are what our government is supposed to stick to.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The young lady at Harvard had hung up the the flag to celebrate George Washington’s birthday and understandably enough the colored students at Harvard were offended. So as a retort directed towards the young lady another student put out a Nazi flag(Mansfield). Mansfield said that “You take offense by giving offense.” This is an example of how freedom of expression may just be racism and why politically correctness matters to an extent. Free speech is important in order to solve any problems at all but because people are taking politically correctness to such an extreme it is as if somebody were “there’s a black man standing.” They would be deemed as a racist when in all reality all they did was state a…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays