https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Co3EWX_Xt0I
Do you see how these blue pill manginas cower through almost 15 minutes of dishonesty mainly because a woman is present? I mean Max boldly said real men's locker-room-talk is "how's your cholesterol?" Really, Max? That's men's lockerroom talk? Lol.
I expect the gynocentric society we live in to bow to women's power-flex but one would think that the world of sports, mainly because it's male thing, would be a bit more objective and more honest than this. I was at least expecting a mention of female locker-room-talk in comparison because I'm willing to bet that women talk about men in the same manner if not worse.
I have to admit that one would have to be a dumbass to make such statements with future aspiration to run for a public office but Donald Trump is different in this case in the sense that his remarks this time aren't too different nor are they anymore degrading than some of the disparaging things he has said in the past, and those things hasn't derailed his campaign one bit. In actuality those other remarks have helped his campaign. Why is this different …show more content…
No, it wouldn't have. Hell I'm sure she would have cracked a joke or two about it during the debate that if a woman sees a nice package there's nothing wrong with reaching for it and it would have generated a few laughs in what would've been the end of it. I mean...this is a woman whose criminal record would put records of some imprisoned violent offenders to shame and she's about to become the president of the United States while Edward Snowden rot in exile for