Preview

Mens Rea Notes

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
875 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mens Rea Notes
Mens rea
Subjectivity is the recklessness and intention : the mental state of d
Objectivity negligence compared to a reasonable mans actions * The mr for murder is did d have malic aforethought : did d have the intention to kill or cause GBH * Recklessness is subjective concept with an exception of criminal damage which is objective now but wasn’t before due to HOL decision in r v g because it included an objective standard of fault

* motive and intention is different : Moloney : a d might intend to an offence yet his motive might be good

* steane : d british who worked in germany in WW2 had to broadcast news on german radio because of threats which meant he was assisting the enemy COA quashed his conviction because they felt sympathetic to the d even though his intention was there but the motive was right

Intention

* Direct : ones aim or purpose – consequences desired but not seen as certain

* Oblique: which is the current law – not ds aim or purpose no desire but consequences are virtually certain

1. Woolin – HOL decided that when a person charged with murder however did not desire the outcome but the outcome was virtually certain , which means he has MR for murder – ds baby was crying and started to choke he shook baby then chucked it on wall baby died . d understood that murder was virtually certain (virtually certain and d appreciated the outcome ) * Development of the law on OBLIQUE INTENT: * Dpp v smith 1961 : d was driving was driving car with stolen property , police asked him to stop but he didn’t , officer was pushed by his car into the way of another car which killed the officer , HOl held that conviction should be murder because intent should be objectively * Section 8 criminal justice act : when a court is determining if d has committed offence * Hyam v dpp : the d put petrol through her ex lovers fiancée Mrs. booth and ignited it and killed two children . HOL held shes convicted

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Decision: In 1980, Williams, seeking a writ of habeas corpus in United States District court was denied but eventually reversed by The Court of Appeals, in that the state failed to prove that the detectives acted in good faith. The United States Supreme Court reversed and remanded the decision, expressing that the condition of the body and the location will be admitted as preponderance of evidence under the exclusionary…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The defendant killed with malice and aforethought (either deliberately and intentionally or recklessly with extreme disregard for human life).…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The individual committing the crime was aware of the risk of injury and willfully disregarded it (Involuntary Manslaughter, 2010).…

    • 3740 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * Is there error in the court denying a jury instructions on criminally negligent homicide, instead instructing on reckless manslaughter, which alleges the defendant had intent to kill, when there is enough evidence to support the theory the defendant’s conduct was unintentional.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stark law is the set of United States federal law that prohibits healthcare providers from engaging in a self-referral of the patient for various health related service, when the health care provider or any other immediate family member of provider has any kind of financial relationship with the entity. This law also prohibits the health care provider from referring (self-referral) the patient to other entities for designated health service (DHS) payable by Medicare and Medicaid when there is any kind of association between provider and entity (Vendenack, 2011). Similarly, this law also prohibits the healthcare organization from billing Medicare of any other health related service provided as a result of self-referral process. This kind of…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “We must look to the outward expression of a person as manifesting his intention rather than to his secret and unexpressed intention. ‘The law imputes to a person an intention corresponding to the reasonable meaning of his words and acts.'” Lucy, 196 Va. at 521.…

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. Administration of Justice Act – If an official kills someone then they are tried in England…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Foresic Science

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Did this case go to trial ? What happened ? What evidence was presented? What expert witnesses testified? How persuasive was this evidence? What was the verdict and sentence? Were there any appeals?…

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    S: Would you then agree that the man had no intention of killing the occupants of the car?…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paralegal Studies

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The next case I reviewed was Walker verses State. A hit a run took place where a witness gave a description of a vehicle and the direction the vehicle had been heading. Two officers, driving separately, went in the direction and found the car. Walker, the car owner, started to the door. As the screen door began to shut, Officer Hoffman, race to open the door. Between the tugging of the two men the door flexed causing the window to break. The evidence proved the case showed violent resistance against Walker, as recorded in Spangler v. State (1993). The State succeeded in a conviction of a Class D felony, but the Class A misdemeanor was ruled insufficient by means of Double Jeopardy. They cannot use the same evidence to convict Walker twice as a result of Richardson v. State, 717 N.E.2d 32, 49 (Ind. 1999)[->0] "No person shall be put in jeopardy twice for the same offense." Two or more offenses are the same offense for double jeopardy purposes if, "with respect to either the statutory…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Law Unit 03 Aqa

    • 2706 Words
    • 11 Pages

    * Morrissons (1989): level of intention is lower when the defendant is trying to resist/prevent an arrest/detention…

    • 2706 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plea Bargaining has become a major factor in our criminal justice system. Like all controversial topics there are many pros and cons that make it hard to decide what is right and wrong about the situation. I personally feel that plea bargaining should be abolished. Plea bargains are creating harm to our criminal justice system. Due to plea bargains the criminal justice system is being undermined and losing control of what is happening to criminals.…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 6 outline

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    c. Specific intent- the thoughtful and conscious intention to perform a specific act in order to achieve a particular crime…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Report

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    [ 3 ]. David Brown et al, Criminal Laws: Material and commentary on Criminal Law and Process of New South Wales, 5th Ed, Sydney, The Federation Press, 2011 p. 143…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Thirteen Colonies

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The English settlement in America occurring around the early 1600’s was the result of the Age of Exploration in addition, the freedom from religious oppression. For the Separatists later known as the Pilgrims, America was a place for dreams and new beginnings given that they were persecuted for their religious beliefs in England. Some fled to the Netherlands finding religious freedom and no work. The Pilgrims however, settled in America. Moreover, the Puritans came to America to practice their religion freely. They strictly enforced their religious regulations in result of the little tolerance they themselves obtained from different beliefs. Due to this lack of tolerance people began forming new colonies. England had three colonial groups identified as the New England, Middle and Southern colonies. Three admirable colonies that may be pointed out from each group are Massachusetts from the New England colonies, Pennsylvania from the Middle and Maryland the Southern colonies.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics