Preview

Merck's Case Ethical

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1756 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Merck's Case Ethical
Merck Case Study

October 14, 2008

Relevant Facts:

Merck was one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world. • Merck was about to lose patent protection of two of its best selling drugs, which had been a significant part of their $2 billion annual sales. • Merck began putting millions of dollars into research (up to $1 billion) and within three years, Merck was able to discover four powerful medications. • Profits weren’t all that Merck cared about; Merck’s founder believed that “medicine is for people. It is not for the profits.” • He also believed that following the “medicine is for people” philosophy would lead to profits and had yet to fail.• River Blindness is caused by parasitic worms, which can be found in the Middle East, Africa and Latin America.• These places are developing, so many citizens are poor. • The worm larvae can enter the body through fly bites, with some people getting thousands a day. • Worms can cause grotesque growths, but the major problem lies in reproduction when millions of progeny are released in the system. •The resulting itching is so intense the infected have committed suicide. • Eventually, the larvae may cause blindness. • Two existing drugs could kill the parasite, but have serious, potentially fatal, side effects. • The only safe combative measure available was insecticides that eventually lose potency with immunity of the flies. • The average drug takes $200 million in research and 12 years time to produce. • In order for companies to stay in business (and ease human pain), they must make complex decisions about which drugs offer the most promise. • Investing time/money into drugs for rare diseases is risky (because the pool of recipients is small). • There are enough people with river blindness that there wouldn’t be a risk of too few people. • Instead, the problem would be that the infected could not afford the medicine. • Merck tested a drug, ivermectin, which effectively killed parasites/worms in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The actions Merck undertook when marketing Vioxx and emphasizing its safety even after finding out the product’s side effects endangered all its key stakeholders and showed the real face of the company that accented its highly ethical maxims. Cardiovascular side effects of the Vioxx increased the risk of complications that could have caused patient’s death, therefore Merck violated the basic right to life of all the Vioxx consumers. It was already mentioned that Vioxx caused 3468 deaths by heart attack and stroke. All these tragedy events could have been prevented if Merck provided adequate information about all the peculiarities of Vioxx. Even though Merck argued that the withdrawal of tests results was caused by its utilitarian intention…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Waymor, Damion. Rhetorical and Critical Approached to Public Relations Edition 2. March 19, 2009…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ethics and Pharmacare

    • 2854 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In this paper I will analyze and assess legal and ethical modifications on marketing relations as it relates to both consumers and organizations. This research will analyze three to five ethical issues that relates to marketing and advertising, intellectual property, and regulation of product safety. The discussion of arguing for or against Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) marketing by drug companies will also be analyze. This paper will also determine who regulates compounding pharmacies under the current regulatory scheme, what the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) could/should have done in the PharmaCARE scenario and whether the FDA should be granted more power over compounding pharmacies.…

    • 2854 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    While Kenneth Frazier worked liability suits for Merck, he caught the company’s attention and they hired him in 1992. By 1999 Frazier was appointed Merck’s general counsel. Merck saw that Frazier had several good personality traits and values that would benefit their organization.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethical Case Summary

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page

    A: MHP educated Braydon the importance appropriate behavior. MHP taught Braydon how to manage his frustration in a positive manner. MHP demonstrated how to express anger in a productive manner. MHP taught Braydon strategies that will allow him to be free of any behavior that would result in negative consequences. MHP educated Braydon on the need to be respectful to adults and avoid talking back. MHP provided a worksheet about anger management.…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    The manufacturer like Merck-Medco, Lilly-PCS were concerned about losing access to their industries to PBM. PBMs are companies that administer drug benefit programs for employers and health insurance carriers. Their contracts are directly to managed care organizations, self-insured employers, insurance companies, Medicare, and almost all Federal and State government health benefits plans. To make the benefit plan more affordable PBM lowered their claims processing fees and also offered rebate retention. PBM also processed prescription drug claims, reviewed prescriptions, offered generic and branded medicines through mail services as well. Hence, due to PBM’s efficiency of delivering and processing the drug cut overall cost of health care benefits, the manufacturer industry got a big hit in their business. So, in the early 1990S, a large growth of managed care changed the health care industry that also had a heavy impact on…

    • 2738 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The topic, human rights responsibilities of the drug companies, which is always controversial, however, is almost sharply defined in a report by the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to health, submitted to the United Nations General Assembly in August 2008. 1…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With no ethics come dishonesty, disloyalty, fraudulence, and a host of other bad qualities. These qualities are total opposite of what one would need to possess if they were handling any form of business in the healthcare field, particularly in the finance department. When working with funds it is important to keep morals and ethics extremely high because when no one is looking is really when you’re being tested. Sometimes, humans tend to let financial issues burden them down to the point of giving up. If a person going through a tough time in life was to have access to a large amount of money, it would be imperative that this individual possessed high morals and strong ethics.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Medical Law and Ethics

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. As employers, physicians have general liability in what three areas? The Practice’s Building and Grounds, Automobiles and Employee Safety.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Medical Law and Ethics

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This assignment is being submitted on August 19, 2012, for Carol Taylor’s M230 Medical Law and Ethics course.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Unjust FDA

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Your standing in line at your local drug store, head killing you, your face feels like it’s ready to explode, and you cannot breathe if your life depended on it. In short your allergies are making your life unbearable, and you are completely out of Sudafed. When you finally arrive at the pharmacist and ask for a box, you are asked for your driver’s license and then promptly turned away. Recent laws have you waiting one more week before purchasing anything that contains pseudoephedrine or ephedrine. Disgruntled and in pain, you walk away and as you leave the store you overhear the cashier tell a customer “instead of buying a pack a day, why don’t you just buy a carton?” Right about now the FDA’s “…goal of a healthier, safer nation…” ("Overview Of The FDA Mission", 2007) does not feel so accurate. The FDA’s regulations are unjust, because they place corporate profits above consumers’ safety, ban proven natural beneficial health medications, and allow the public’s lifestyle demands to alter their mission.…

    • 1784 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Drug Companies and Ethics

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Merck is one of the largest and most profitable drug companies in the world, but they have also been a leader in a donation program that helps Third World countries in Africa, South America and Yemen since the 1980’s.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The pharmaceutical giant and British drug maker, GlaxoSmithKline, has agreed to plead guilty and pay the government three billion dollars in a health care fraud settlement bought by the FDA. This is the largest settlement involving a pharmaceutical company in recorded history. GSK have admitted to committing three fraud charges. They promoted the off-label use of two anti-depressant drugs – Paxil and Wellbutrin. The two anti-depressants are not necessarily considered as bad medicine instead the GSK failed to apply for approval from the FDA. GSK broke the law when they marketed the drug for a non-approved use under the FDA. The second charge that was made against GSK was when they held back data and made unsupported claims regarding its diabetes drug Avandia. The third charge that was made against GSK was when their sales team used inappropriate and illegal marketing tactics to get the doctors to prescribe their drugs. In addition to using illegal marketing tactics, they offered doctors free spa privileges, trips to Jamaica and Bermuda, and concert tickets. The three criminal charges involved Paxil, Wellbutrin and Avandia and included a criminal fine of $1 billion. The remaining $2 billion involves fines in connection with a civil settlement over the sales and marketing practices of the blockbuster asthma drug Advair and several other drugs (NY Times). GSK have not only violated the rules made by the FDA but also committed basic unethical behavior. Even though the $3 billion may seem like a large amount, it represent only a small portion of what Glaxo made on the drugs. According to IMS Health, Glaxo’s diabetes drug Avandia racked up to $10.4 billion in…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Merck Case

    • 587 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. How has Merck been able to achieve substantial returns to capital given the large costs and lengthy time to develop drugs?…

    • 587 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to pharmaceutical analysts, pharmaceutical industry’s marketing tactics are usually grouped into five categories: physicians-targeted promotions, direct-to-customer advertising, unethical recruitment of physicians, researcher’s conflicts of interest, and data manipulation in clinical trial, according to the…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays