Preview

Merck, the Fda, and the Vioxx Recall

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
672 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Merck, the Fda, and the Vioxx Recall
Merck, the FDA, and the VIOXX Recall

MBA 520 Ethics and Leadership in a Global Environment
11.15.2009

MBA 520
15 November 2009
Merck, the FDA, and the VIOXX Recall In 1999, Merck started a clinical trial called VIGOR, checking the effectiveness of VIOXX in patients with gastrointestinal problems, and in this trial they noted for the first time that patients taking VIOXX suffered roughly twice as many heart attacks and strokes as those taking the control, Naproxen. Early in 2000, Merck began another clinical trial intended to test for the effectiveness of VIOXX as a possible cure for colon cancer. By 2003, the panel monitoring this trial noted that the incidence of heart attacks and strokes was 20 percent higher among patients on VIOXX than on the placebo and by 2004 this difference was 80 percent; in September of that year Merck withdrew Vioxx from the market (Waymor). If I was the CEO of Merck I would have disclosed these risks to the FDA as soon as they were discovered so that the patients currently taking VIOXX would have been able to make their own informed decisions whether to continue taking it or not. Merck profits would have dropped, but patients would have lived and Merck’s legal liabilities would have been far less. By the time Merck withdrew VIOXX, they had known of evidence that it lead to increased cardiovascular risks for at least three years and possibly more and had publicly denied that there was any risk associated with VIOXX (Waymor). On September 30, 2004, Merck ran an ad in many national newspapers which announced their withdrawal of VIOXX from the market. The advertisement consisted of a letter from Raymond B. Gilmartin, Chairman, President and CEO of Merck, and included the company motto: 'where patients come first." The ad typically appeared in the business section of the newspaper, but placing it in the daily newspaper around the country suggests that it was meant to be viewed by the public at large.



Cited: Waymor, Damion. Rhetorical and Critical Approached to Public Relations Edition 2. March 19, 2009 Heal, Geoffrey. When Principles Pay: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Bottom Line: May 2008 Lawrence, Anne T. Business and Society Stakeholders, Ethics, Public Policy 12th Edition New York, NY 2008. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The FDA considers education as a means to prevention rather than medication. From the perspective of medication, over-medication in pursuit of prevention might mask serious medical problems. JJM is likely to approval much easier and faster if they only claim “treatment.” If JJM wants to enter the market early, dropping the “prevention” claim can reduce the risk of the FDA’s disapproval and speed up Pepcid’s OTC introduction.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Merck and Vioxx

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In May of 1999, the FDA approved the use of rofecoxib. Marketed under the name of Vioxx, rofecoxib was manufactured and distributed by Merck, a large pharmaceutical company. Doctors prescribed the drug as a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and prescription painkiller. Five years after its release, rofecoxib was withdrawn because of a study that showed the drug more than doubled the risk of heart attack or stroke. Because of Merck’s ongoing and increasing knowledge of the dangerous effects of the drug while continuing to distribute rofecoxib, Merck should be held accountable for acting unethically.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The actions Merck undertook when marketing Vioxx and emphasizing its safety even after finding out the product’s side effects endangered all its key stakeholders and showed the real face of the company that accented its highly ethical maxims. Cardiovascular side effects of the Vioxx increased the risk of complications that could have caused patient’s death, therefore Merck violated the basic right to life of all the Vioxx consumers. It was already mentioned that Vioxx caused 3468 deaths by heart attack and stroke. All these tragedy events could have been prevented if Merck provided adequate information about all the peculiarities of Vioxx. Even though Merck argued that the withdrawal of tests results was caused by its utilitarian intention…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Medicines Company

    • 868 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Medicines Company Case Write-Up: Terence Cho, Felipe Duarte, Aleks Loiko, Robert Shaw, and James Wang…

    • 868 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, several studies have questioned the cardiovascular safety of Vioxx. The manufacture of Vioxx has announced a voluntary withdrawal of the drug from the U.S. and worldwide market in September 30, 2004. After the company’s own 3 year study was stopped. Two million Americans were taking Vioxx when it was pulled and Merck had said that approximately 20 million people in the U.S. have used the drug. This withdrawal was due to some safety concerns of an increased risk of cardiovascular events, including heart attacks and strokes in patients taking Vioxx during the first 18 months. In the 5 years that Vioxx was on the market over 88,000 and 140,000 cases of heart disease were reported, of those cases 30 to 40 percent were fatal. The records indicate that the action of both Merck and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) found nearly 30,000 excess cases of heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths that resulted from the use of this drug between 1999 and 2003. Over 300 lawsuits have been filed against Merck, and was expected that thousand more will…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Res 351 week 2

    • 985 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Merck & Co. marketed a drug called Vioxx. The drug was said to have less gastrointestinal problems than its competition – Naproxen. However, Vioxx had considerably more side effects including; heart attacks and strokes (Vershoor,C.C, 2006). Merck and Co. were accused of several unethical acts, therefore, the drugs were pulled from the market in September 2004. Unfortunately, not before 100 million prescriptions were filled. Merck & Co. was also accused of misrepresenting or concealing of study results to doctors. The New England Journal of Medicine reported that previous studies of three patients had been withheld. All three patients suffered heart attacks when taking Vioxx. Sales reps for Merck & Co. were trained to use subliminal selling tactics. Additionally, Merck & Co. only chose biased speakers of their products at educational…

    • 985 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bristol Myers

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The strategy exerted by Sherman of Apotex was considered to be great judgment call on his part as well as the business. I believe he acted ethically in his strategy and negotiated terms that would benefit his business. He performed extensive research and found many distributors who wanted to purchase Plavix at very low and reasonable cost. On August 8th Apotex launched its generic Drug. Sherman states that, “There should be no mistake that our decision to launch a generic of this blockbuster product at risk is a testament to our commitment to patients, consumers and taxpayers (Baron, 2010). Because he was a good business man he made sure that the product was on the market and sales were soaring.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 1 Homework

    • 900 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I think with the aspect of economics the company has done the right thing as far as design great drugs in the past, and often even took losses with the making and delivery of those drugs. When it comes to Vioxx, I tend to believe that they should have informed the public and the doctors prescribing and taking this drug with all their findings and notions before the hard evidence came about. I do believe that not telling the whole truth about their findings to the doctors and the pubic goes against my belief in ethics. If I had anything to do with the distribution of the drug before the 2004 removal from market, I would have really studied the reports and warnings, and if I saw what was being reported and said from the scientist, then I would have stopped the sale of it then, and not wait until 2004. I would then have made a public address and told the public and doctors why we are stopping the sale and production of this drug. This would have again put more faith into the company from the public view as well. This is a hard question because if we look at the tobacco companies, they are still selling tobacco that has been proven over and over again to be harmful to humans and animals. I am a smoker and hopefully one day will quit, but for a company to continue to produce and sell a known harmful and deadly product, this is ethically bad for them as well as our government to even allow it. Where is the ethics in all of this? I will never figure that one out.…

    • 900 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Going to the doctor’s office is never a fun experience. Probing, poking, and trying to decipher what the doc writes on your prescription can be confusing, however, the most upsetting part is what goes on behind closed doors. Big Pharma, chapter 3 of Lies the Media Tells Us, explains the PR tactics of drug companies. James Winter explains these tactics used to persuade doctors to use their brand. In some cases these doctors can get free vacations, cars, front row seating for a basketball game, and a stack of cash. The doctors that respond to these tactics are completely unethical. Doctors have the responsibility to prescribe the best drugs for their patients. Although many Doctors pick what gives the best gift package.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brain Gym Analysis

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Drug companies distribute and promote their changed results in academic journals, tricking very nearly anybody into putting their dangerous and inaccurately tested drugs on the market. In duplicate publication if a drug company gets a better result, they will republish their findings in slightly different ways and in multiple academic sources. “One drug called ondansetron managed to overestimate the drug's effect by 23% using this method” (Goldacre, 2011, pp.164-165). Side effects usually happen and can often be severe. Harmful side effects and their negative results, when known, can discourage medicine buyers. Drug companies can muffle the negative reactions by contrasting them with horrible symptoms that another, comparative medication may have. According to drugwatch.com, one type 2 diabetes drug, Actos, which was prescribed 10 million times and FDA approved, increases the chance of bladder cancer by 40% and causes an increased risk of heart failure. Vioxx a painkiller that was approved in 1999 by the FDA was studied in a trial against an older drug, naproxen, to compare the different side effects much money was invested in the trial, and the pending…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The topic, human rights responsibilities of the drug companies, which is always controversial, however, is almost sharply defined in a report by the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to health, submitted to the United Nations General Assembly in August 2008. 1…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical perspectives in the field of communication offer dynamic looks into not only the field itself, but into the civic-life aspect of this field, also called “lifeworld”. A lifeworld, according to Habermas, is all the immediate experiences, activities, and contacts that make up the world of an individual or corporate life. Specifically, Contemporary Rhetorical Theory offers a way to understand the communicative process and what the communicative process is. Contemporary Rhetoric itself is not communication - rather, it provides important aspects into understanding what communication is; rhetoric is praxis. “Praxis is when theory and action are combined…” (Farrell, 1999). Contemporary Rhetorical Theory establishes theoretical assumptions of human society and the communicative act, as well as, test those assumptions by analyzing human society through the everyday civic life. “…rhetoric derives its materials from the real conditions of civic life, the appearances of our cultural world. At the same time, this activity makes room for disputation about the meaning, implications, direction, and…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study2 Merck Company

    • 606 Words
    • 5 Pages

    •Although company is 15 years old, none of its drug was successfully completed by FDA…

    • 606 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Merck Essay

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rejecting this investigation could have had a serious impact on the morale of Merck employees, who are "inspired to think of their work as a quest to alleviate human disease and suffering world-wide". Along the same lines, the approval for the 3 stages of clinical trials was also a decision based on Merck's overall corporate philosophy. A possible way in which the situation could have been improved at this stage would have been to start exploring a strategic partnership with a third party international entity or government, in order to increase the likelihood of achieving a future deal that would allow Merck to recoup some of the funds invested in this project, if a viable medication was ever…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Biomax Case Summary

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Company's primary strategy is to get those prescriptions surrendered by other pharmaceutical organizations. Despite the fact that the Company has received 4 standards to screen among the competitors, in any case it confronts the potential danger of disappointment. Drug organizations relinquished these items for a mixture of great reason including security, viability and benefit potential. Why does the Medicines Company have the Golden Finger? There is no such ensure that items which consent to the 4 criteria will end up being a blockbuster product. The Company seems to fail to offer an agreeable advertising arrangement for Angiomax and other future medications that are coming to company regarding to FDA. So we should stay sensible about…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays