Preview

Mesopotamian, Egyptian, and Hebrew Religious Contrast

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
966 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mesopotamian, Egyptian, and Hebrew Religious Contrast
Hist 103
7-12-13
Hurricane crisis
With the smell of the freshly cut parade deck, the sound of Knobs scuffling in the gutters to class, and and the warmth from the radiant Charleston sun, it is just another beautiful day at The Citadel. As the day passes along however, the weather takes a turn for the worse. An unexpected hurricane comes sweeping through the campus in a path of destruction. The hurricane’s destructive force makes a mess of campus, but the history building in particular is hit worst of all. Some of the survivors begin to contemplate why their building was hit so hard, yet the english building is practically unscathed. As if it were something out of a writing prompt, three civilians from ancient worlds have come to offer their possible explanations in an attempt to comfort the professors. The first person, a Hebrew claims that the hurricane was a sign from God that they have sinned beyond return much like the flood from the book of Genesis and that bad things happen to good people, comparable to the Book of Job(Laws, Gods, and Heroes, 51-60). The second, a Babylonian believes that this was the work of many gods, and that the professors were no longer needed for use and disposed of. He compared it to the extinction in “The Epic of Gilgamesh” and suggested that they should live life to the fullest(The Epic of Gilgamesh). The third man was a polytheistic Egyptian, who explained the disaster should be blamed on the pharaoh. He offers comfort in that, now the deceased may proceed to Paradise, and compares the events to the story of Osiris(Laws, Gods, and Heroes, 46-51).

The first explanation, from the ancient Hebrew standpoint, is one that unlike the Egyptians and Mesopotamians, the Hebrew god is a personal one, and that man is his child(Laws, Gods, and Heroes). The Hebrew believes that the history department was chosen by God to be punished. In the story of Noah’s Ark, God sends a flood that wiped out all of man, except for Noah and his family,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Andrea, I like the paragraph you pulled from the book because it really sheds light on the major changes of how life is lived now. To Ish, the great disaster is something he has experiences first hand where the younger members of the tribe have only heard of what happened. As generations continue the great disaster becomes history, another event in a book. The first hand experience is gone because all who lived during it have pasted. There is a world of difference between experiencing something and being told about something. It reminds me of 9/11, being that freshmen entering high school this past year are the first class to learn about 9/11 as history because they were not alive during it. It’s a foreign concept for me to think that student…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    From 3500-1500 BCE, Mesopotamia and Egypt emerged as two of the first river- valley civilizations. Although they came to be around the same time, they became different in their cultural aspects, such as universal views and classes, and economies due to differences in commerce.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mesopotamia and Egypt were two of the very first civilizations dating back to 3500 BCE. Their cultures were very similar, but were very different. In what ways were their cultures similar and different? Mesopotamia is similar to Egypt in that both were based around a river system and they both created their own form of writing. These two civilizations are very similar, but they are also different in that their structures are used for different purposes and Mesopotamians invented more important things.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Egypt and Mesopotamia vary drastically in land and geographic features due to its location. They had more differences than similarities which was a cause for the uniquely different cultures of each.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the ancient world there were many different aspects to developing culture. The Mesopotamians, Hebrews and the Egyptians shared many characteristics while at the same time differed greatly. Considering their views towards gods, social order, and life after death, one can discover the lives of the ancient people. Illustrations of their literature, art, and architecture help reveal this information. Although these different civilizations had similar living conditions, the way that they developed different aspects such as gods, social order and beliefs about life after death resulted in completely diverse cultures.…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The First Civilizations for the River Valley differed among class systems, gender roles, and even trading. Class systems determined whether or not you were high in ranking. Mesopotamia and Egypt both had different views on these class systems. Egypt had pharaohs, which were basically wealthy kings and queen who can control mass numbers of people. Gender roles between these civilizations varied between upper class men and woman to slaves. Upper class men and woman had more freedom than the enslaved people. Slaves were used strictly for work, and they received seldom food and shelter in return. Mesopotamia did not have that many natural resources; therefore, they had to trade with other civilizations to get the necessary needs. Egypt, on the…

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Egypt and Mesopotamia were both flourishing examples of civilization in their day, yet their worldview differed drastically: Mesopotamia had a negative outlook upon the world and life in general, whereas Egyptians had a much more positive worldview. The negative worldview of the Mesopotamians was most likely caused by the instability within their lives. For example, their two major rivers—The Tigris and The Euphrates—flooded wildly at unpredictable times, ruining crops and causing mass starvation. Being unable to know, each year, whether farms would be able to yield enough crops to feed the population definitely would have added to the negative attitude of the Mesopotamians. Another contributor to their negative worldview was how easy it was for armies to invade. Because there were no mountains or other natural barriers in place, marauding armies had no trouble marching across the flatlands of Mesopotamia in order to pillage and loot villages and farms outside of large cities. Mesopotamian commoners, who didn’t live within the protective walls of citadels, were often subject to the raids of roaming armies, and thus were unable to feel safe, adding further to a negative worldview. Another reason Mesopotamians had a negative worldview was their religion. They viewed the gods as bickering deities, who had no problem smiting down people and razing cities just for their silly whims. Furthermore, they believed that the afterlife was nothing more than a dreary world where souls would bide out eternity in. All of these factors contributed to Mesopotamians believing that the world was little more than a prison of suffering which would go on to lead to an endless existence of emptiness. In complete contrast to the Mesopotamians, the Egyptians had a far more stable lifestyle, and thus a much more positive worldview. Unlike the wild Tigris and Euphrates, the major river of…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the Agricultural Revolution, the rise of civilizations scattered around the world, each one having various features that formed from their people and the land. Two civilizations that honed similarities and differences, Mesopotamia and Egypt, grew and adapted alongside river valleys—the Tigris and Euphrates rivers and the Nile respectively. Both civilizations turned to control and unify their people through ideas of class hierarchy and kingship. However, Mesopotamian life differed from Egyptian life, consisting of troubles in their crop production, negative viewpoints about death in their religious beliefs, and more restrictions for slaves and women.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    year of wonders essay

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the novel Year of Wonders, the text explores the brutality of nature and people within a small community stricken with disease, but also the sense of hope, which characters encounter in their own ways. The exploration of brutal maltreatment to particular characters within the novel emphasises the changes to everyone’s behaviour during the plague. From Anna having a childhood of abuse, to Puritans within the community of Eyam who dedicate themselves to self-harm, to rid all sin, shows the desperate measures the characters go to in order to grant their way to God. In contrast, Brooks manages to incorporate the theme of new life and hope to all in result of the plague. New perspectives of the world are formed, a sense of community is more evident and the plague ultimately changes the relationships between each character. Between brutality and hope, both are contrasting each other with Brooks exploring the positives and negative connotations of the plague and how each person is affected.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first civilizations in Mesopotamia, Egypt, Palestine, and the Near Eastern States had many different and yet many similar religious views. The Hebrew’s religion became one of the chief religions of the Near East. While most of the other religions of the ancient Near East were polytheism, the Hebrew religion was monotheism. Some of the ancient Near East religions believed that the king ruled in service of god or that the king was a god. The Hebrew religion, however, believed that there god was a spirit and spoke to his people and his prophets. Most of the ancient Near East religions had different social classes where the kings, priests, and noblemen were first, the commoners were second, and the slaves were third. The Hebrew religion believed that they were all of Gods people and that everyone was equal according God. Women, in most ancient Near East religions, were considered as “baby makers”, house keepers, and sometimes were involved in property ownership and business. Since the Hebrew’s believed in a patriarchal family, women still weren’t respected as much as men but were still prophets and “heroes”. One ancient Near East religion, Zoroaster, was very common to the Hebrew religion. They both were monotheism, and believed in good deities such as “truth”, “righteous thought”, “devotion”, etc. for laws and way of living. They also both believed in dualistic power, or two divine forces, but that only one true god in whose messages we are to hear. These forces were God and an evil omen; or devil. The ancient Near East religions and Hebrew religion had many differences but were also similar in several…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the life of Egypt and Mesopotamia there were similarities and differences. There are comparisons in culture, social class, and gender. Also parallelism in their religions existed however, the differences found, clearly define them as individual entities.…

    • 560 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to completely understand the relationship between two events, comparing and contrasting is necessary. Through comparing similarities and differences it is easier to analyze why things developed and occurred the way they did. For example, in comparing Egypt and Mesopotamia it will be easier to achieve understanding of major aspects of their culture, the way other cultures impacted them, and their influence on the future. In addition to the similarities between the two cultures, the differences are what make them unique. Although Egypt and Mesopotamia both left stable heritage in their respective regions, due to geographic location their influences on politics, economy, and social relations differ.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When reading the Hindu writings about reality, there were many apparent similarities when compared to Egyptian and Hebrew ideas. Along with these similarities however, came many distinct differences.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How much did ancient civilizations have in common? To figure this out the civilizations like Ancient \Egypt and Mesopotamia need to be compared and contrasted. All of the ancient civilizations formed around rivers, but is there really anything alike about them beyond geographic location.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ancient Mesopotamia went through many different empires that shared similar parts cultural traits, where as Egypt went through several different rulers, but only a few dynasties. Mesopotamia lied in between the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers, and its main empires existed from 1650 BCE to around 330 BCE. The ancient Egyptian empires went through four main phases: The Archaic Period (3100-2600 BCE), The Old Kingdom (2660- 2160 BCE), The Middle Kingdom (2200-1730 BCE), and The New Kingdom (1570-1130 BCE). These two civilizations were located in close enough proximity to trade, goods and ideas. Egypt and Mesopotamia branched off of the…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays