Preview

Mesothelioma, Exposure to Asbestos Dust: The Legal Case of Enid Costello

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1431 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mesothelioma, Exposure to Asbestos Dust: The Legal Case of Enid Costello
Sienkiewicz v Greif

Facts
Enid Costello died of mesothelioma in January 2006. From 1966 until 1984 she was an office worker at the defendant's factory premises. The defendant manufactured steel drums and during the course of this process, asbestos dust was released into the factory atmosphere.
Although Mrs Costello did not work on the factory floor, her duties took her all over the premises. In common with other inhabitants of the local area, however, she would also have been exposed to a low level of asbestos in the general atmosphere.

Causation
The general rule at common law is that a person suffering injury must show on the balance of probabilities that the defendant's tort (most commonly negligence) caused the injury or condition. But for the defendant's wrongdoing, the claimant would not have suffered the damage (this is sometimes called the "but for" test).
There is an important exception to this rule. In the case of a "divisible" disease such as pneumoconiosis, the amount of dust inhaled operates cumulatively to cause the disease and determine its severity. If exposure to the dust is partly due to the defendant's negligence and partly not, the defendant will be liable to the extent that his breach of duty has materially contributed to the disease. If there is more than one defendant, liability can be apportioned.
This approach, however, causes difficulties in mesothelioma claims because, unlike pneumoconiosis or asbestosis, mesothelioma is an "indivisible" disease. It is still uncertain whether its contraction or its severity can be related to the amount of asbestos fibres ingested, or even which fibres triggered the disease.
In Fairchild v Glenhaven [2003], the House of Lords (as it then was) recognised that, in a mesothelioma case where the claimant had been exposed to asbestos at different times while working for different employers, it would be impossible to satisfy the conventional "but for" test and prove which exposure was the cause of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bugusa Case Summary

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The tort of negligence applies in this scenario. Negligence is described as a party who fails to act reasonably, even when the act is not intentionally, or it does not intend for harm to occur (Melvin, 2011).…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bernard Banton's Case

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Originally, Banton’s case was heard in the New South Wales Supreme Court and in 1989, the case was moved to the Dust Diseases Tribunal as this was a more appropriate way of dealing with his case. After Banton was diagnosed with asbestosis, he never gave up on himself as he continued to continuously campaign and bring attention and awareness to the general public about asbestos related diseases. The issues that had arrised in the Banton case was that his boss James Hardie owed not only Banton but his other employees a duty of care. Hardie knew about the dangers of asbestos and let his employees work at his company without access to any protective clothing while on the job and did nothing about this incident. Bantons whole view on this event that occurred in his life was that something needed to be done about this so he took James Hardie to court to fight for his…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Negligence isn't the just factor that needs proof. You also need to illustrate the scope of seriousness. There need to be evidences of losses suffered; such as, health care expenses to take care of the injuries. There may also need evidence like missed income while getting well. Other losses may be the pain and suffering, physical disability, damaged facial look, psychological suffering and more.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lawsuit Mesothelioma

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    At the point when mesothelioma has been analyzed, one of the essential choices that the patient and his family need to make is regardless of whether to continue with a lawsuit mesothelioma. Since mesothelioma is brought about by asbestos, and in light of the fact that the organizations that uncovered their representatives and clients to asbestos knew about the dangers that they were presenting individuals to, individuals who have been influenced by lawsuit mesothelioma have a privilege to document a lawsuit for harms created by their carelessness and hardness. Such a variety of lawsuits have been documented and the recompenses that have been won by casualties either as a consequence of a choice…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 6

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    John S. Herbrand, J.D., Choice of law as to application of comparative negligence doctrine, 86 A.L.R.3d 1206 (Originally published in 1978).…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hsa 515 Law and Health

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The first element that a plaintiff must prove is that the defendant owed him or her legal duty of care. Generally, this duty of care is a legal notion that states that people owe anyone around them or anyone who could be around them a duty to not place them in situations of undue risk of harm. Proving this element will largely depend on the facts of the situation. After the plaintiff has proved that a legal duty of care existed, he or she must then prove that this duty was breached. Generally, courts will use the standard of a ‘reasonable person’ when it comes to this question. Specifically, this means that the judge or jury must view the facts of the situation and decide what a reasonable person would have done in a similar situation. If this reasonable person would have acted differently than the defendant, it’s likely that it will be found that the duty was breached. Causation is the most complicated element of negligence. It means that the plaintiff must prove that the defendant either directly or indirectly caused the injuries and damages suffered by the plaintiff because of the breach of the duty of care. This element has confused even the most respected legal minds over time, and its proof should not be taken lightly. Last, a plaintiff in a negligence case must prove a legally recognized harm, usually in the form of physical injury to a person or to property. It is not enough that the defendant failed to exercise reasonable care. The failure to exercise reasonable care must result in actual damages to a person to whom the defendant owed a duty of care (FindLaw 2012). These damages can be actual costs such as medical expenses and lost income or intangible costs such as pain and suffering or loss of companionship.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aed 201 Week 6

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages

    |Name of Case: Aaron Moore Vs. Willis Independent |was later diagnosed with inflammation of the Esophagus |negligence. The teacher could obviously tell that the student was indeed |…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Washington Case Law Case

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Gifford v. Mateka, an unreported case from out of Division III, the defendants moved for summary judgment, in part, because they claimed the statements of one of the plaintiff’s experts, a toxicologist, were insufficient since he was not qualified to give medical opinions. No. 25886-2, 2001 WL 819067, at *4 (Wash. Ct. App. 2001). The court held that the toxicologist “was qualified to link exposure to mold with the type of respiratory and other harm [plaintiff] alleged in her complaint.” Id. The court also held that although the case involved obscure matters beyond the comprehension of a lay juror, “it does not follow that only testimony by a medical doctor can suffice.” In fact, the court held that “given the particular source of harm alleged in the complaint—mold—the expertise of a toxicologist was required to clarify an obscure factors.”…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    *Johns-Manville case: he was guilty of selling materials that contained asbestosis and fraud and conspiracy.…

    • 2303 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Elements Of Negligence

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page

    Negligence law states that a person or an organization is generally liable when they negligently injure others.…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Defendant has to take a responsibility if the accident happened in their area or property. Additionally, the Plaintiff also negligence in their action lead to the damage so they also have a duty to themselves.If Plaintiff contributed in some way to their own loss or injury, liability will be appropriated between defendant and the plaintiff (Ingram v Britten)…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are three types of asbestos: blue (crocidolite), brown (amosite) and white (chrysolite). These were used in UK industries until the ban on imports of blue and brown asbestos in the 1980s and on all types in 1999. Exposure to blue and brown asbestos is commonly linked with mesothelioma. However, exposure to all types of asbestos is harmful.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To be guilty of negligence, a defendant in a lawsuit must breach that duty of care, and the breach of duty must be the cause of harm to the plaintiff.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Stage 1 - Malignant mesothelioma is present in the left or right chest cavity (pleura) and may have metastasized to the lung, the sac around the heart (pericardium) or the diaphragm on the same side. Lymph nodes at stage 1 are not involved.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gender, exposure, age can make prognoses vary widely between people. Women tend to have a better prognosis with a longer survival time than men. It's thought that this is due both to hormonal differences between genders and the form of exposure to asbestos. Men usually have had direct exposure to asbestos while women have secondhand exposure and this may play a part on the severity of the disease. Those who develop mesothelioma without having been exposed to asbestos generally have a better prognosis. Mesothelioma diagnosed at younger age has a better prognosis because the body typically more healthy overall and can handle more extensive treatment than what would be possible…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays