Preview

Michael Wood Second Amendment Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
482 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Michael Wood Second Amendment Summary
In The second amendment is a recipe for police killings Michael Wood explains how the Second amendment is a danger to police officers. Wood used the shootings in Baton Rouge as an example of how the Second amendment, which grants Americans the right to be armed, is a threat to police officers due to the easy access everyone has to all different types of weapons, guns especially. Anyone can simply walk into a store and purchase a gun, of course there is a process you are required to go through before you can receive your gun, however training in weaponry similar to law enforcement is easily accessible which could possibly be harmful to police if a gun was placed in the wrong hands. The author also made a point about how some people see the …show more content…
When this amendment was written, bear arms, meant weapons, not only guns, but guns were definitely included. Bear arms means you can physically carry a gun on you or keep them at home. The second phrase the helps explain what the Second amendment is is, shall not be infringed. The Second amendment doesn’t grant Americans the right to carry a weapon, however “shall not be infringed” means that the government does not have the right to tell you not to do so. In this article, Michael Wood believes the the Second amendment should be repealed, because it, “grants Americans a constitutional right to be armed, is an extreme danger to police officers”; however, the Second amendment does not give Americans the right to carry, but that the government doesn't have the right to tell the public not to. The shootings in Baton Rouge do go against the amendment, because the shootings were intentional and possibly a hate crime against the victim’s race. Many like having firearms at their house or on them for protection or recreational purposes, however in the recent shootings, guns were used for the intentional killing of innocent people. These shootings were possibly motivated by the gunman’s hate towards people of color or just out of pure hate towards all

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    According to Steve Rusiecki (A local police officer in his area). In this process, Richard talks about the Second Amendment, which is a well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed; and the reasons for the second amendment. The Founding Fathers included this in our Bill of Rights because they feared that the Federal Government might oppress the population if the people did not have the means to defend themselves as a nation and as individuals.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment states, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” This amendment has caused many debates throughout the years due to the different ways in which it could be interpreted. Most federal appeals courts have said that, when read as a whole, this amendment protects only the rights of the militia to bear arms. However, on a decision made on March 8, 2007, the majority focused on the second clause, saying that the amendment protects the rights of individual people to own firearms as well. The decision was made in a federal appeals court in Washington to strike down a gun control law in the District of Columbia that made it impossible for residents to keep handguns in their homes. The court ruled that banning the right to own firearms was a violation of the Second Amendment.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The United States Constitution was created on September 17, 1787 as the supreme law of the land. This document outlines the ten amendments which guarantee certain rights that American citizens will always have. One of these freedoms and possibly the most important is the right to keep and bear arms. As written in the Constitution, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” (U.S. Constitution). Whatever the purpose these guns are meant to serve it is clear that the right to own them cannot be impaired.…

    • 2498 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    For years now our country has been in a heated debate on the second amendment. Some people feel that it is not safe to let citizens have and carry guns, while others agree it is their right as an american to own a gun. In America, there are approximately 270 million firearms possessed by civilians, and only 897,000 carried by police.Close to 33,000 Americans were victims of gun-related deaths in 2011 and an average of 268 citizens are shot every day. In the past decade our country has witnessed 142 mass school shootings and, in 2010 alone 19,392 people committed suicide with a gun. These frightening statistic are what I believe cuz some people to be against the second amendment.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment has been one of the most controversial topics that America faces today. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" (LII). Under the constitution, you are able to own guns but there has been many restrictions and Acts that control your rights to a minimum. Gun rights reforms are how the Acts and certain limitations are made. These reforms are made to help lower the dangers of these weapons and allow for higher protection. The Second Amendment and Gun Rights should be adapted to today’s society along with certain past events to allow citizens to bear arms publicly. In multiple scenarios, these past event may have been avoided if gun control was open to more eligible citizens.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    citizens feel that the Second Amendment is necessary and is still relevant today. The supporters of the amendments have claimed that having the right to bear arms provides them with a sense of security and safety. As supported by 2001 National Gun Policy Survey of the National Opinion Research Center conducted by Tom W. Smith, “Most gun carries indicate that they feel safer carrying a handgun (59%). “ This 59 percentage of people feels that carrying a gun with them gives them a sense of satisfaction in terms of their safety. However, a more recent study has contrasted this survey with the support of events that take place everyday. According to the study conducted by the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, “Members of the public who carry guns risk escalating everyday disagreements into public shootouts, especially in places where disputes frequently occur—in bars, at sporting events, or in traffic.” This demonstrates the risk caused by the Second Amendment as it creates dangers for the people. The availability of guns or the right to bear arms has made the public areas a danger for everybody. As the study reports, people carrying guns have utilized the advantage of using them for their benefits in small arguments resulted by disagreements. An example that verifies this study is the incidents that too place in 2014, where a retired police officer who carried a legal concealed handgun murdered a man for a mere disagreement. The officer shot…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The right to bear arms is the the Second Amendment in the United States constitution. What says a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. The right to bear arms has been around this country long then it's been a country. Putting more restrictions on guns just goes against what our founding fathers intend the nation to be like and infringes against the right to bear arms.The second amendment supports my claim which is anti-gun control laws and how putting restrictions on gun makes it…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is quite telling that one of the first conditions the founders made a point of spelling out in the document, was the right of the individual to bear arms. The second amendment does not stipulate the types or numbers of firearms. It can be assumed that was because at the time of the framing of the Constitution, there were not many different types of firearms in existance. But it does have some fail-safes in place to allow the government the ability to place limits on the manufacture, ownership, and sale of…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The wording in the Bill of Rights supports citizens in having the individual right to bear arms. The Second Amendment includes the term “the right of the people” which is used frequently throughout the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, and most commonly indirectly refers to individual rights. The Second Amendment also references pre-existing individual rights with the statement of “shall not be infringed” which is a possible reference to the 1689 English Bill of Rights in which English citizens were allowed to bear arms (French 2-3). Individual liberties granted to citizens are directly stated in neither the Bill of Rights nor the Constitution. The controversy on whether the Second Amendment was meant to be a collective right is eliminated with the analyzation of the wording presented in the Bill of Rights, thus, stripping the Second Amendment would be a violation of individual…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is why some people are so vociferous about what they believe is necessary to achieve a less violent society. In addition to the Second Amendment dispute, liberals view it as reassurance that, “the federal government would not disband their militias” (Wasserman 1); henceforth not permitting the right for every individual to bear arms. They also conceived that when the Second Amendment addressed Americans as, “the people,” they do not mean individuals themselves, but the “people as a whole” (Wasserman 1). Some also proposed individuals do not need guns for protection and that, “it is the role of the local and federal government to protect the people through law enforcement agencies and the military” (Student News Daily 1).The people place great confidence within our government to defend us against any threats to the American people. It is also believed that if the militia had enough firearms to protect our nation, then the personal ownership of guns for “self-defense” would not be needed. Even if law enforcement agencies were the only ones able to bear arms, there would still be the concern of police brutality or abuse of authority. Another promoted conjecture is that, “additional gun control laws are necessary to stop gun violence and limit the ability of criminals to obtain guns” (Student News Daily 1). It is a widespread belief that the more laws the legislature passes on…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    America's Second Amendment

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The text of the Second Amendment of America’s constitution is as followed “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary for the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (U.S. Const. amend. II). This small portion of text has been widely debated and analyzed over the years to determine exactly what it entails in order to discover what rights it actually grants United States citizens, if any. Over the course of our nations brief existence we, as a people, have had the pleasure of practicing our right of self-preservation through the tools that have been bestowed upon us via the Second Amendment. However, some individuals have grown comfortable in an existence where…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recently, public debates have been less focused on the safety and wellbeing of our youth and kids. Instead, the debate has been heavily focused on the meaning of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the proper use of guns by the adults. The Second Amendment reads, "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second amendment is an exceedingly controversial amendment in the constitution. The amendments right to bear arms was “instituted within the Bill of Rights to suppress insurrection, participate and uphold the law, enable the citizens of the United States to organize a militia, and to facilitate the natural right to self-defense” (Logan). Some citizens suggest the analysis of the “right of people” shows that it protects the individual rights of citizens to own personal guns. From whatever some “citizens” may assume the second amendment to be, it establishes defense, protection, and safety among each citizen. The intents of the second amendment is to delineate upon the freedom of each individual. Moreover, this personal liberty prevents citizens from tyranny and oppressive governing. People have the right to make their own choices and whatever he or she decides to do with that right is up to them. However, one should not use the second amendment to put others in danger like Chris Mercer, the shooter at Umpqua Community College in Oregon. The second amendment justifies individual liberties for people to protect themselves in all cases. From the shooting that occurred at an Oregon community college, the nation’s second amendment has been the topic of debate.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    senior editor of USA today and Mother Jones stated that in 2002, there was a mass shooting that happened in Appalachian School of Law in Virginia. The killer was stopped by armed students, but those students were current and former law enforcement officers. Also, the killer was out of bullet when they subdued him. (More guns More mass shootings) This shows no matter how responsible the gun owners are, if they don’t know how to handle the life threatening situations, it becomes more dangerous because increasing the number of guns only creates more volatile and explosive situations. So I think having firearms at home is dangerous to kids but also useless when you really need it. Then supporters of the second amendments will say, gun laws won’t…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1791, when the 2nd amendment was written, there was an organization called the watch. It was “made up of six watchmen, one constable, and several volunteers who patrolled at night, walking the rounds” (national law enforcement museum). Their job was to investigate and punish the criminals. The modern police’s job is to prevent and investigate the crime, and to punish the criminals. Police prevent the crimes before it even happens. Some people might ask how do they prevent crime, answer lie in a person’s phone. In 21st century most of the people who are at a crime scene will rather call the police than trying to stop it themselves. This show how much people depend on law enforcement rather than getting involved themselves. If citizen are not going to use a gun in situations like this, then they should not keep…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays