Sailors aboard the 7th Fleet have adapted to a life of constant deployments and endless working hours.
While their deployments are technically shorter, the cycle of repairs performed after each one is brief and does not provide enough rest/maintenance time for the crews and ships. The ships themselves, which can range from millions to billions of dollars in cost, suffer as maintenance is rushed in order to meet a rather draconic deployment cycle. Meanwhile, the sailors endure suffering at the hands of supervisors who rationalize these events by way of the old “if I had to endure it so will you”. But, it’s not like they’re all at fault for these events as the officers in charge of the vessels have a serious hand in these
decision.
Officers can become overzealous in their endeavor to join the ranks of the next higher paygrade which can often cloud their judgement. In an interview in the aforementioned articles an officer expresses his concern for how he handles obstacles by questioning his own motives behind the decisions taken. Was it all for the greater good, or was he just trying to satisfy his own ego and impress the higher-ups? Was the risk of endangering an already exhausted crew, and the safety of their ships worth it at the end of the day? Who can truly say?
These questions are difficult to answer due to how over time people change along with their perspective, yet it shows a degree of introspection that is often necessary when it’s most needed. It’s unfortunate that these questions couldn’t be asked before the catastrophic events of 7th happened and the lives of so many were lost to the depths of the ocean. Events like these can fundamentally change a person, and sailors aren’t any different. While they will endure, the people in charge of these situations will have to live the rest of their lives not knowing how a simple no we can’t do this at the moment would have changed everything…