Military Use Of Military Force Essay

When it comes to the use of force on one country, the United States has never really adopted a clear policy or guidelines. This has caused some tensions on when the use of force is actually warranted because it is up to the commander in chief to determine this. There are certain situations when the use of force will be warranted overseas. Additionally, there are pros and cons when it comes to not having an actual policy when it comes to using the full force of military occupation. Over the years we have seen Presidents use military force for a vast majority of reasons and each gave examples for their actions. As many look back at the use of military force, each president had their own reasons to why they decided on those actions. The most important aspect to remember is that military force should be used as a last resort after all nonviolent actions have been taken (Lango, 2009). Due to the lives at stake along with the massive amount of costs associated with war, it can make the civilian population very upset. With the most recent attack in Syria shows that the country is always ready to use force
This is one example of when military force was warranted to ensure the wellbeing of civilians were being considered. Just days before that, the local government decided to use chemical weapons on their own people. In 1925, the Geneva Protocol created a regulation that prohibited the use of chemical weapons on warfare (n.d). Since this country decided to use it on their own people, the United States saw this as a violation and decided to use military force. The local population could not defend themselves so a larger government stepped in to ensure their well-being. This would be a good decision to intervene because the use of chemical weapons should be banned all together. With this situation there are several risks associated with the decision that was