Preview

Mill On Liberty

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
878 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Mill On Liberty
In On Liberty, Mill thinks that it is beneficial to the good life if the liberty of a person can only be legitimately limited in order to prevent the harm of others. He believes that the good life is based on the principle of utility, where the greatest amount of happiness is achieved for the greatest amount of people. He believes both individuals and society are capable of self-improvement and argues for liberty on the foundation that individuality is beneficial to society because it leads to personal development. Mill defends non-interference in two main areas; thought and discussion, and action. He thinks government action will inevitably pose a threat to liberty and therefore must be carefully monitored. Mill makes many powerful points …show more content…
Mill argues, “in proportion to the development of his individuality, each person becomes more valuable to himself, and is, therefore, capable of being more valuable to others. There is a greater fullness of life about his own existence, and when there is more life in the units there is more in the mass which is composed of them” (779 On Liberty). In other words, individuality is good because it promotes happiness for the self, which ultimately promotes happiness for the whole of society. This is an essentially utilitarian argument, because individuality is valued as a means of achieving happiness and not for being of inherent value …show more content…
His main principle states that “the sole end for which mankind are warranted, individually or collectively, in interfering with the liberty of action or any of their number is self-protection…the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others” (752). Mill’s harm principle allows individuals to do whatever they please so long as it does not harm others. However, utilitarianism is by definition concerned for the collective well-being and prescribes limiting individual liberty in order to add to the happiness of the collective. The harm principle implies that the utility principle has no power within the domain of the individual so long as their actions are “self-regarding” (753). For utilitarians, there is only one principle: that of utility. Mill is introducing a second, the principle of liberty, and seems to privilege it the same by protecting it, regardless of its contribution to overall happiness. Mill cannot label his argument “utilitarian” because favouring a principle that does not necessarily maximize happiness is not conducive to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mill's argues for the Harm Principle based on liberty. He says that liberty must be protected and that is why we must follow the Harm Principle. He argues for the Harm Principle based on freedom of speech. Basically, what I got out of it, he says that no matter how badly the speech may seem immoral, it should be allowed regardless. It might help to add that we learned that Mills is a libertarian. Overall, Mills thinks that the government should not coerce people in to not doing…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, Utility, or the Greatest Happiness Principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness” (11). That quote is from “Utilitarianism” written by John Stuart Mill. Mill is noted in history as a man who pushed for radical change of social and legal principles using Utilitarianism as his guide. That quote sums up his belief in that theory. In this essay I will be discussing Mill, the theory of Utilitarianism and how that theory relates to contemporary ethical issues.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Comparing Devlin to Mill.

    • 1787 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mill perceives only one instance in which society is justified in interfering with or limiting the freedoms of its adult members, that being to prevent harm to others. Though Mill would…

    • 1787 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mill vs Dworkin

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages

    "I forego any advantage which could be derived to my argument from the idea of abstract right as a thing independent of utility. I regard utility as the ultimate appeal on all ethical questions; but it must be utility in the largest sense, grounded on the permanent interests of man as a progressive being". Mill does not argue that liberty is a right but rather that giving people liberty has beneficial consequences. Mill thinks that paternalism does not serve the utilitarian purpose (to provide the greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of people) because the extent that “the most ordinary man or woman” knows about him or herself “immeasurably surpassing” anyone else. Any effort from the state to interfere, even from good intention, tends to lead to “evil” rather than good, since no one knows or cares more about his own interest than himself. As a result, “Mankind are greater gainers by suffering each other to live as seems good to themselves, than by compelling each to live as seems good to the rest”. The state should not interfere at all, except for when the act can harm others (Mill’s Harm Principle).…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Ethical Life, Russ Shafer-Landau talks about John Stuart Mill and his theory on Utilitarianism. Mill states that Utilitarianism is the most influential presentation of doctrine and agrees with the Utilitarian belief of which is ethical decisions should be based on the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. But if this is true, then would people not act out of personal interest? Utilitarianism, as previously stated, is the belief of which ethical decisions should be based on the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Kant vs Mill

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mill’s book of Utilitarianism is based on standard of morality. Every human has the ability to be happy, this results in being virtuous and the most virtuous have sacrificed. Utilitarian’s sacrifice good for others good but only for the happiness. This results in moral worth. The moral worth is determined by the result of an action. Therefore, Mill is a consequentialist. An example of consequentialism would be lying. Mill would say lying is bad but lying could have a good consequence. A person may lie they won a competition fairly when they were bribing voters for they’re favor in order to win which satisfies them bringing happiness.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Mill’s Utilitarianism, he examines what determines an action to be considered right or wrong, his own version of the hedonistic utilitarianism argument. He claims that these qualities, including the quantity, are an important factor in determining, when included in the consequences, the criteria of an action. The consequences of ones actions are an important element in society, one that is based on cause and effect. When an action is committed, it is important for an individual to consider what the consequences will be, regardless of the motives, because when the action has gone through, the consequences will be held in th spotlight by society, regardless of the motives of the…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The foundation of this viewpoint is the harm principle, which serves as a focal point for the competing ideologies of tolerating diversity, rejecting oppressive traditions, and accepting diversity. This principle maintains personal freedom while guaranteeing the welfare of the community by suggesting that society should not interfere as long as an individual's actions do not hurt others. According to Mill, this strategy is essential for creating a society in which a diversity of beliefs and ways of living are not only tolerated but also encouraged. Mill's conception of liberty advocates for a kind of freedom that is both socially and personally gratifying, going beyond simple independence from constraints. Mill challenges the difference between individuality and conformity, diversity and unity, by seeing individual liberty and…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Stuart Mill

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mill’s Utilitarianism states that in order to be moral, one must make decisions based upon the greatest happiness. In…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With this general happiness for everyone’s well-being, a persons priority or rights can’t take a lead or be more important over the general happiness of everybody (chapter II, p.17). This agrees with Aristotle’s, that the political functioning in a society through virtuous character are to benefit the community. Mill argues against Aristotle by claiming that because having security is the definitive right that is deserved by all people through law, certain actions, such as torture, are just in order to ensure that a person has security (Chapter 5, p.54). With this being said Utilitarianism follows a concept that is focused on the general happiness of everyone in the community, but also the happiness that comes to them through security. Mill states that there are certain qualities that show justice and injustice, and some of these qualities are that it is unjust for a person to be deprived of their legal and moral rights, but it is just that everybody should get what they deserve. According to this, torture of a person, can be justified because it will overall give people assurance of security and happiness. But, it is also unjust because it violates a person’s moral and legal rights. This is where the General Happiness Principle comes into play. The Greatest Happiness Principle holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness and wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness, which is pain (Chapter 2, p. 7). Happiness is the absence of pain or freedom of pain, which is the only thing that should be desirable as an end and people will always choose the end that is overall more desirable in pleasure (Chapter 2, p. 8). Mill clearly states, “…laws and social arrangements should place the happiness or the interest of…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Js Mills Conformity

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Society in general does not give enough importance to spontaneous action. Additionally, Mills claims that the government should allow the specialized, informed people to make their own, educated decisions, with the exceptions of education, children/inferiors, contracts and perpetuity, poor laws, monopolies, colonization, labor hours/class interest, and infrastructure (Mills, 1038-1041). In these situations, the government makes decisions so as to best protect and serve the individual and others, and to protect those who do not know from themselves/the harm of others. This is important because it goes back to Mills’ point that it is better for humans to be individuals so that they can make their own decisions that are not uniform with everyone’s decision otherwise this leaves very little room for economic variation or diversity which is essential for ethical economic thoughts and growths. Mill also speaks about the importance of a person to have his own desires and impulses; strong impulses produce energy, the fuel for change and activity in the economic…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Good and Evil in High Noon

    • 1373 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Utilitarianism is an ethical theory most often ascribed to the philosopher John Stuart Mill. The utilitarian theory suggests actions and/or intentions are not right or wrong; rather the morality of a choice or act is determined by the outcome or result. Utilitarian’s believe outcomes can be determined in advance of an action and the ethical choice is one which provides the best result or most happiness for the greatest number of individuals (e.g., pleasure, happiness, health, knowledge, satisfaction). The utility theory asserts morality is a means to some other end, it does not stand on its own as being intrinsically moral.…

    • 1373 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The great majority of people don’t feel government opinions as theirs, but when they do it, their individual freedom is occupied by the government. Mill says that there is a strong rejection against any attempt of the government to control people. He states that the one of the most important objectives of individual freedom is self-protection. The power that can be exercised over individuals is to prevent hurting others, which is known as the harm principle. Punishments must be imposed to those who harm other people, so one’s aim must be to prevent evil actions.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It can be argued that what John Stuart Mill argues is indeed correctly thought out and the best application to having the freedom of doing an action if it doesn’t cause any harm to anyone else. Therefore, there is no just reason to stop someone from doing an action if it doesn’t affect you in a negative manner. The counter-argument is that every action that has be done affects all individuals be it directly or indirectly. Mill (1859) states that whatever society that has been established and doesn’t or hasn’t adopted this mindset isn’t free at all.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant Vs Mill

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This view forms the basis of the contrasting argument between him and Kant .Mill principle of `utility also known as the greatest happiness is that, when people act out of duty it justifies the utilitarian principle as a foundation of morals.It explains that actions are right in proportions and promote overall human happiness of everything or anything that can ;possibly tolerate pain.it focus on the consequence of actions.Not on rights or ethical sentiments.it is best to be cultivated and noble…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays