To enter into a contract, a party must be legally competent. Parties that cannot generally enter into contracts include minors and persons adjudged to be insane. Contracts entered into with either of these types of parties may be void and unenforceable.…
3. To achieve justice in contract cases involving minor and an adult I would want to know if the adult is treating the minor differently than he would be treating an adult customer. I would also want to know if the adult is stating every detail and obligation that comes with the contract.…
The law requires that both parties that enter into the contract process have the capability to actually enter into the contact. Most adults over the age of 18 are considered to have legal capability to enter into a contract CITATION Hob13 \l 1033 (Hobart Community Legal Service, Inc, 2013). However, there are certain circumstances that would prevent a party from having the capability to enter into a contract. Those circumstances are being a minor under the age of 18, mental illness, being under the influence of drugs, bankrupt, and enemy alien CITATION USL141 \l 1033 (US Legal, Inc., 2014). If a party enters into a contact and it is found that one of the signing members of the contact falls into any of these circumstances, then the contract becomes null and voided. Once capability is verified for all parties entering into the contract, the actual legality of the contact must be verified to protect both parties.…
In a typical person’s lifetime they will encounter many situations where they will enter into a contract with someone else. There are many different types of contracts that we may enter into, some knowingly and even some unconsciously. Buying a car with financing is a type of loan, entering into a new work place, and even getting a haircut is a type of contract.…
I do believe that when a business hires teens, rather than experienced workers they have a greater obligation to protect their safety and health. My reasoning would be to age and experience levels. A teen is not as…
1) A contract made by a minor is voidable. The minor, Frank, in other words, may avoid the legal liability under a contract. Upon reaching the age of majority, a minor may affirm the contract and therefore make it contractually binding on him. Frank can only avoid a contract during his minority status and only for a reasonable time after he reaches the age of majority.…
Some jurisdictions do not permit the minor to get away with the lie. Some states require the minor to place the adult party to the contract in the same situation that he or she was in before the contract. Others allow the adult to use tort law, rather than contract law, to sue the minor for fraud.…
Minors are not considered to have the full capacity of an adult which is one of the reasons they are not allowed to enter into a binding contract with some exceptions.…
Kalen is a seventeen year old boy who rented an apartment for $500 a month, after consistently paying for rent for 4 months, he decides to return the key and not pay rent for the rest of the remaining months on the contract. I would think that this is classified as “disaffirmance”. Since he is seventeen, and a minor when he leaves the apartment, he is able to legally avoid his contractual obligation with the landlord. The reading doesn’t state if he lied to the landlord about his age, if that was the case, he would be bound to lease and need to pay the amount owed due to the deceit.…
An advantage to juveniles being handled in adult court is that many juveniles would not be arrested anymore for crimes considered against the law presently for minors. Many adolescent offenders are arrested for minor crimes now and if they are already on probation many trivial acts such as a suspension from school for “anything” can push them into a juvenile placement long term. I have seen it many times. Kids that are on probation for something they did 2 years prior such as at the age of 14 yrs old will get sent away at 16 yrs old because they skipped class or missed curfew assigned by probation officer because it is a violation of their probation. However, other kids that have not been caught selling drugs or under age drinking get warnings…
If juveniles were to be treated as adults they would have a disadvantage because they are still learning to calculate risks and self-regulate. This is why juveniles do not have the right to vote, drink, and smoke. They are not fully developed…
In ice hockey, there are many different penalties, but there are 3 main types: Minors, which give 2 minutes in the penalty box, major, which gives 5, and misconduct, which either gets you thrown out of the game or ves you 10 minutes on the bench. I’m going to talk about one of the minor penalties. This one is called hooking. Hooking is when a player wraps their stick around another player’s body and holds them back, in which the referee’s would blow the whistle and put that player in the box. One of the major penalties is called fighting. Fighting is when 2 players drop their gloves and stick onto the ice punch each other until either the refs break it up or one of them go down. This would result in both players going to the penalty box, or…
Usually, juveniles and their attorneys fight to keep a case in juvenile court. But there are also advantages to being tried in adult criminal court. For example, minors have the right to a jury trial in adult court. Juries tend to be more sympathetic to a minor. Thus making it a little easier to convince or plea for lesser charges. In most places the jails are crowded and the courts are more likely to give the juvenile a lighter sentence.…
The respondent is unable to justify the violations of Section 8 and 10 of the canadian charter of rights and freedoms (charter) with regards to section 24 (2) of the charter. Section 24 (2) states that where in proceedings under section (1), a court concludes that evidence was obtained in a manner that did not infringe or deny any rights of freedoms guaranteed by the charter, the evidence shall not be excluded if it is established that, having regard to all the circumstances, the admission of it in the proceedings would bring the administration of justice into disrepute (charter).…
Two other issues that tend to arise in the case are what were the circumstances that led to the father’s signature being on the contract? Did the guardian have informed consent at the time of signing the contract or was it simply a mechanical signature? The other issue raised refers to whether the contract is to the prejudice of the minor and if so the contract will be null and void.…