Miracles: Pros and Cons Essay
Tanner Morrell
John Brown University
Authors Note
Miracles: Pros and Cons paper is to share integrative analytical thinking about religious philosophy accompanied by biblical knowledge and basic scientific facts showing an insight of the writer’s main conclusions. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Professor Stephen McClain, John Brown University, 200 2807 Ajax Ave, Rogers, AR 72758
Jesus of Nazareth was said in the bible to have performed over thirty miracles. All of the miracles can be broken down in classification of three categories, controlling nature, healing people, and raising the dead. The vast majority of his miracles were in accord with healing individuals, which seem to be his specialty. The purpose of the essay is to propose three pros and cons of why people should or should not believe whether the miracles actually happened in history.
Throughout history there has been one sol book stating Jesus is God and being God gives him the ability to perform miracles. The bible claims Jesus healed the man with leprosy in Matthew 8:1-4, Mark 1:40-44, and Luke 5:12-14, which happens to be one of Jesus’s most renowned healing miracles. Also, the bible claims to heal blind men (Matthew 9:27-31), Peter’s paralyzed mother-in-law (Matthew 8:14-15; Mark 1:30-31; Luke 4:38-39), demon-possessed man in synagogue (Mark 1:21-28-28; Luke 4:31-37), Roman centurion’s servant (Matthew 8:5-13; Luke 7:1-10), etc. Healing the sick and diseased is nothing short of a miracle. The bible, undoubtedly, mention these acts as factual along with the other two categories. Surely, healing the sick and diseased is enough to claim the title of God, however Jesus Christ does not stop at healing. Jesus presumes to control nature. He controls the elements making up our material world inside the third dimension. He is described as a perfect alchemist because of his ability to show mind over matter by turning water into wine (John 2:1-11), calming a storm (Matthew 8:23-27; Mark 4:37-41; Luke 8:22-25), and walking on water (Matthew 14:22; Mark 6:47-52; John 6:16-21). Jesus was even said to have raised the dead (Luke 7:11-17; John 11:1-44; Matthew 9:18-26; Mark 5:21-43; Luke 8:40-56). Clearly if this is true this gives Jesus powers outside of this particular dimension the human race is currently in.
There are many things to consider whether one chooses to believe in Jesus’s miracles or not. Historians bring several relevant scenarios to this matter. One positive fact of proof is Jesus had more than one gospel account of his miracles. In the first century, written books were a rarity. Most people were illiterate and books were not produced unless there was something important to write about. This makes Jesus’s gospels more credible considering multiple books are written about the same story.
Secondly, it is highly unlikely for a fictitious over exaggeration to commence so quickly. The biography of Alexander the Great depicts fallacy of his story sum five hundred years after his death. Historians believe it generally takes five hundred years after a story to dilate to a fictitious exaggeration. Jesus’s gospels were written within the first century and some around the fifty year mark. This is a span of 1 generation. There would be hundreds if not thousands of eyewitnesses still alive to clarify Jesus’s gospels.
Finally, there is no literature in the time period to deny Jesus performing miracles. Scholars would expect there to be hostile Jewish literature denying the miracle workings, however none exist. There are plenty of unsympathetic references to Jesus of Nazareth, but none denying the gospels facts.
There are two sides of the coin on a belief standpoint. The majority of scholars undoubtedly believe Jesus was atleast a healer of psychosomatic maladies which consist of healing a person’s mind-body instead of healing organic compounds. More or less, skeptics believe Jesus would activate a personal belief to heal themselves.
Secondly, a lot of critical thinkers consider the miracles to be nothing less of hyperboles. It is not hard to believe the stories of Jesus’s miracles are metaphorical stories. A rational approach would be to think Jesus was a healer, but a psychosomatic malady one. This does not disprove the outline of Jesus’s gospels, but showing meaning of metaphorical parables.
Thirdly, there is some testimony suggesting the miracle workings to be fallacy. In the beginning of the New Testament there is a scripture from Apostle Paul and I Corinthians 1:22-23 stating Christ being crucified is a stumbling block for Jews and foolish to Gentiles. Some feel this discredits Jesus miracle workings and even the story of Jesus.
There are several cons and pros to proving and disproving Jesus’s miracles proclaimed in the gospels. In turn, there is no denying the lack of hard scientific evidence to consolidate the miracles as fact or for it being wrong. One can not doubt existence itself or other accounts of dimensional space inhabitance. Quantum mechanics have been proving existence in extra dimensional realms inside of the third dimension and for the authors viewpoint it is not hard to consider the possibilities of producing miracles. Simply not understanding something does not mean it does not exist. Evolution is playing a role of expanding intelligence. Science is something society as a whole can agree upon for the most part, however science is a progressional philosophy that is always evolving. One day there may be cold hard evidence of miracles being factual or we may never know and as of now the decision to believe or disbelieve is a matter of having faith.
Reference
The Holy Bible containing the Old and New Testaments. Trenton: I. Collins, 1791. Print."The Miracles of Jesus." Share Faith. N.p., n.d. Web. 6 Mar. 2014. <http://www.sharefaith.com/guide/christian-ministries/ministry-of-jesus/miracles-of-jesus/miracles-of-jesus---the-list.htmlFind a website by URL or keyword...>.Morais, Daniel, and Michael Glighorn. "Did Jesus Really Perform Miracles?." PROBE Ministries. N.p., n.d. Web. 6 Mar. 2014. <http://www.probe.org/site/c.fdKEIMNsEoG/b.4227257/k.3E6C/Did_Jesus_Really_Perform_Miracles.htm>.Slick, Matt. "When were the gospels written and by whom?." |What are the dates and authors of the gospels?. N.p., n.d. Web. 6 Mar. 2014. <http://carm.org/when-were-gospels-written-and-whom>.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The reoccurring miracles that Jeremiah performs throughout the novel Peace Like A River by Leif Enger are motifs that support the them in the novel. The miracles in the novel show that Jeremiah could solve the problems at hand including curing Reuben's breathing eventually even if it doesn't seem possible. Reuben's breathing problems were a battle he had to face throughout the book and it ties itself to the them. These miracles are shown through several chapters in the novel. The first miracle that Jeremiah did in the novel was int eh first chapter when Reuben was born. Reuben somehow survives even his lungs weren't working because Jeremiah performs a miracle by saying " 'Reuben Land int he name of the living God I'm telling you to breathe.'…
- 366 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
This paper will cover the eight great sign miracles that Jesus performed that was listed by Dr. Towns. These miracles are also recorded in the Gospel of John and will be outlined below.…
- 1059 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Like anything in life, faith starts out for most as a journey. Often growth in faith is so gradual it is hardly noticeable. There’s no thundering voice of God striking down the disbelievers, but rather small miracles like getting an A on a test with little preparation. It is only self reflection faith grows because of struggles in life. In A Prayer for Owen Meany by John Irving, John Wheelwright’s faith and his belief in miracles juxtaposes Owen Meany’s innate beliefs. John Irving follows John Wheelwright’s growth in faith and miracles and highlights Owen’s steady support.…
- 1281 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
A miracle is often defined as an extraordinary event which cannot be explained either by natural or scientific laws. However, this definition of miracles often varies person to person. R.H. Holland defines miracles as a “remarkable and beneficial coincidence that is interpreted in a religious fashion,” whereas David Hume, writing during the Enlightenment period as an empiricist claimed that miracles are both improbable and irrational. In his book, Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Hume defined miracles as a violation of the laws of nature. Although Hume may say that miracles are the least likely of events, that does not lead on to say that they do not occur at all; it is possible to say that they do occur but it is not very likely. Also, it is difficult to explain these extraordinary events, and so a miracle is a good way of explaining these things. This essay will discuss Hume’s claim, and will come to the conclusion that miracles are not the least likely of events.…
- 1133 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Hume takes two arguments against miracles, theoretical and practical. His theoretical case against miracles is that they are theoretically possible or probable for miracles to exist. This is split in to two arguments the Argument from probability and Induction. A miracle would be based on induction which would come from cause and effect suggesting that the laws of nature are no violated. The more an event happens in a particular way the less likely it is that the opposite will happen, for example the sun will rise so it will always rise.thereofore it is more rational to believe that miracles do not happen. This is supported by Flew with the testimony from history, that there is a lack of direct and empirical evidence for the number of people to have seen a miracle. However, Swinburne suggests that just because it is not a regular occurrence it does not mean that they did not happen once in history. This therefore highlighted that Hume’s claim that miracles are least likely of events is probably true.…
- 654 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Three opposing arguments will be examined for the resurrection of Christ. Many arguments have been made against the resurrection throughout the years, but the three most popular theories will be explained. After the opposing arguments are explained, four arguments for the resurrection will be presented to refute those claims.…
- 1763 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
He argues that when investigating any story of a miracle, evidence can be collected, such as from human witnesses. Also the laws of nature appear to be fixed and unvarying. For example, the law of gravity is the same throughout the universe so far as we know. Miracles must appear to violate the laws of nature. In conclusion he argues it is more likely that the report of a miracle happening is incorrect than that the laws of nature have been violated.…
- 1133 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
“[Miracles] would not…answer any useful purpose.” said Thomas Paine, author of “Common Sense.” In Paine’s mind, miracles were out of the question because Christ would be degrading Himself and nature would have to change its natural order to accommodate Jesus. Perhaps, Paine could be considered a bit of a snob. Jesus walked the earth long before Paine’s time and had to use example from that time period to help people understand much like how Paine had to examples from the war in his paper to stir people to action. Christ used miracles in the culture He was in to help people trust him.…
- 451 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Here we have these scriptural bible texts. I will go through with you, about the miraculous way of Jesus's healing, and his stories he would share to make a point, message, or moral. Parables are a simple story used to illustrate moral or spiritual lesson, as told by Jesus in the gospel while meaning not stated it is often obvious. A miracle is an event which the forces of nature-including the natural powers of man-cannot of themselves produce, and which must therefore, be referred to a supernatural agency. Bible miracles, has two different miracles; healing and nature. This essay will talk about two stories, a healing miracle and a parable.…
- 595 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Ultimately, miracles are only miracles if they are witnessed. Reuben, the witness, develops an inseparable relationship with God through the miracles of his birth, his father walking on air, and his…
- 407 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Some theists of the Abrahamic persuasion claim that the harmony of the universe is proof of an intelligent designer. This argument is known as the teleological argument and has evolved from classical philosophy to modern theology. In addition, subscribers of the Abrahamic religions also hold that God has attributes that include omniscience, omnipotence, and benevolence. Fundamentally, God is all knowing, all-powerful, and all good. In contrast, God created a perfect universe that is in harmony, but occasionally practices miracles. Can the teleological argument, miracles, and God’s attributes coexist in a rational universe? This essay’s goal is…
- 2343 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Hume defined miracles as a “violation of the laws of nature” and consequently rejected their occurrence as both improbable and impractical. This view has been supported by modern scientists and philosophers such as Atkins, Dawkins and Wiles to a certain extent. However Aquinas, Tillich and Holland and Swinburne to a certain extent reject Hume’s reasons, instead arguing that miracles have a divine cause and that Hume’s arguments are weak. This essay will argue that Hume’s reasons for rejecting miracles are not valid and in doing so consider his two main arguments; lack of probability and Hume’s practical argument.…
- 1319 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Since the crucifixion of Jesus, opponents of Christianity have directly criticized the religion’s foundation, attempting to belie the historicity of Christ’s physical resurrection. Aiming to nullify Christianity and confute the prospect of supernatural intervention or divine involvement, skeptics and opponents of Christianity continually disseminate naturalistic alternatives, or conspiracy theories, to contradict the resurrection account. One popular notion reasons against the validity of witness accounts, postulating post-crucifixion appearances of Jesus were merely hallucinations, temporarily experienced by some of Jesus’ early disciples. This paper will examine this hallucination hypothesis, showing inconsistencies within the…
- 2130 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The Miracle of the Sun is an alleged miraculous event witnessed by as many as 100,000 people on 13 October 1917 in the Cova da Iria fields near Fátima, Portugal. Those in attendance had assembled to observe what the Portuguese secular newspapers had been ridiculing for months as the absurd claim of three shepherd children that a miracle was going to occur at high-noon in the Cova da Iria on October 13, 1917. According to many witness statements, after a downfall of rain, the dark clouds broke and the sun appeared as an opaque, spinning disk in the sky. It was said to be significantly less bright than normal, and cast multicolored lights across the landscape, the shadows on the landscape, the people, and the surrounding clouds. The sun was then reported to have careened towards the earth in a zigzag pattern, frightening some of those present who thought it meant the end of the world. Some witnesses reported that their previously wet clothes became “suddenly and completely dry.” Estimates of the number of witnesses range from 30,000-40,000 by Avelino de Almeida, writing for the Portuguese newspaper O Século, to 100,000, estimated by Dr. Joseph Garrett, professor of natural sciences at the University of Coimbra, both of whom were present that day. The miracle was attributed by believers to Our Lady of Fátima, an apparition of the Blessed Virgin Mary to three young shepherd children in 1917, as having been predicted by the three children on 13 July, 19 August, and 13 September 1917. The children reported that the Lady had promised them that she would on 13 October reveal her identity to them and provide a miracle “so that all may believe.” The event was officially accepted as a miracle by the Roman Catholic Church on 13 October 1930. In the image above you can see some of the many witnesses photographed during the event.…
- 566 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
‘A Belief in Miracles Leads to the Concept of a God Who Favours Some but Not All of His Creation’ – Discuss…
- 3173 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays