Preview

Modern History Albert Speer

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1475 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Modern History Albert Speer
Q1. Provide a detailed description of THREE significant events in the life of the personality you have studied. (10 marks)

Albert Speer was born on the 19th of March 1905. His family was very well off compared to the general population and their social status demanded an adherence to social conventions and formality. As a student and early adult, Speer was very apolitical however leaned towards the communism. Speer was first introduced to Nazism in 1930 where he was first inspired by Hitler’s oratory skills. Speer became a member of the Nazi Party on March the 1st 1931 with the membership number 474,481. From this point Speer was provided with many opportunities within the party, specifically in architecture, Hitler was especially impressed by Speer’s early work and later made him Armaments Minister. At the end of World War II, Speer along with other leading Nazi’s were put on trial by the International Military Tribunal in Nuremberg, known as The Nuremberg Trials, where many Nazi leaders were sentenced to death or imprisoned as Speer was in Spandau for extended periods of time. Each of these were significant events in the life of Albert Speer who died in 1981.

In 1934, Speers predecessor Troost died, suspicious circumstances and at the age of 29, Albert Speer was appointed Hitler’s chief architect. After doing early work for the Nazi Party in the form of the redecoration and rebuilding of Goebbels’ headquarters, Hitler was impressed by his ability, interest in grandeur and good organisation skills. Once appointed as the First Architect of the Reich, Speer played an important role in propaganda. The 1934 Nuremberg Rally was an important project for Speer, which was filmed by Leni Riefenstahl and his work was displayed in her film, “The Triumph of the Will.” After his success of the rallies at Nuremberg, Hitler ordered an expansion on the parade grounds and Speer was placed as head architect, this was an important project for Speer as Nuremberg was viewed as “The

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Serving as Hitler’s Major Architect throughout Speer’s involvement in the Nazi regime, there are many structures and designes that contribute to the significance of Speer throughout Germany. The first of such would be the construction of Nuremberg stadium in 1934. Here Speer efficiently and decisively built the permanent reviewing stand for the Nuremberg rally and developed what he called his “cathedral of light”. In effort to achieve a dramatic affect, 130 high-powered searchlights were installed around the zeppelin field stadium, casting beams of light some 8000 metres into the sky. Along with the construction of the massive Reich eagle overlooking the zeppelin field, Speer contributed to the installment of Nazi propaganda on German landmarks and was most recognized internationally for this project in particular. In 1939, Speer completed the new Reich’s chancellery building in Berlin. This architectural development was significant within Germany as it signified the new age Germany Hitler was so determined to construct. Both Speer and Hitler purposefully strove to construct a specific style of architecture that…

    • 1462 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Albert Speer was, arguably, the most complicated personality in the prominent Nazi officials. He began his career after joining the Nazi party as an architect; and his friendship with Hitler propelled his promotion to Reich Minister for Armaments and War Production. When Germany lost the war, Speer was one of the few Nazi officials to evade the death sentence. There are two historical viewpoints as to the role of Speer. The first is that Speer was merely a technocrat, with no political views- and this view is created by Speer in his post-war writings, as well as historian Joachim Fest. The second viewpoint, which is more widely believed than the first, is that Speer was a clever man who manipulated the Nazi party, the Nuremburg War Crimes prosecutors and also the world through his books after…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 1934 Nuremberg rally- Speer’s work was a propaganda tool to show how great German was and their supremacy.…

    • 505 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Speer’s rise to prominence continued during 1936, where he took the job of rebuilding Berlin and is evident from Picker who claimed that the renaming of Berlin into Germania was to give a sense of unity. In January 1938, Hitler entrusted Speer with creating the new Reich Chancellery and wanted it completed at the end of the year. Speer succeeded and created a neo-classical style building with days to spare. He helped Hitler achieve his purpose of impressing visitors and earned Speer a good reputation with the…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many historians such as Alan Bullock praise Speer's performance at the Nuremburg Trials and were convinced that Speer had told the truth. They label Speer an 'apolitical technocrat', 'more concerned with the job he had to do than the power it brought him.'(1) American journalist William Shirer reported on his trial at Nuremburg and came to view him favourably (2), whilst British academic Hugh Trevor-Roper interviewed Speer, and in his book The Last Days of Hitler, describes Speer as the 'penitent Nazi'.(3)…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Speer's Significance

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In February 1942, Hitler's Minister for Weaponry and Munitions and chief civil engineer, Fritz Todt, had been killed in a plane crash, to which Speer was then appointed to take over all Todt's offices, which gave him responsibility for the German construction and energy industries. When Speer took on this role, he had soon realised that Germany was not prepared to fight a major world war. Nazi leaders did not have a clear military strategy and didn't understand how any war could affect the German economy. They believed that each campaign would be swift and easily won within a few weeks, and as a result only weapons with a limited use span would be designed…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Albert Speer Characteristics

    • 4463 Words
    • 18 Pages

    The envisionment was a five kilometre avenue stretching through the centre of the city leading to a domed hall, a triumphal arch to dwarf that of Paris’, the other end of the avenue would be 'the Fuhrers ' palace and many cultural buildings, cinemas and operette theatres were to be built making it one of the most extraordinary architectural plans during the time. However, Germany’s Germania never ended up being built. Speer labelled these dimensions as examples of megalomania. When Speer was asked about Hitler’s plans for a new chancellery in Germania he said “Hitler was pleased with the long hike the diplomats had to take in the recently completed chancellery….i therefore doubled the distance….making it more than a quarter of a mile.” It was a vast undertaking. Plans were swiftly drawn up by Speer’s office, and were presented to the public on January 28th, 1938 where the reaction within Germany was predictably enthusiastic, with newspapers carrying detailed explanations and…

    • 4463 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through this membership, Albert Speer began to receive his first commissions. Karl Hanke, a Nazi official in Berlin, requested Speer renovate his personal home, and later he was accorded the more demanding task of rebuilding the Party headquarters in Berlin. The result impressed the Nazi leadership and in 1933 Speer was invited to rebuild the government's Propaganda ministry. Speer pledged that he could achieve total construction in two months, a promise which he fulfilled. However his mentor Tessenow was dismissive: "Do you think you have created something? It's showy, that's…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In my essay I will assess how significant Albert Speer was to the running of the Nazi war machine and the Nazi regime. I will look at how such an intelligent, well-intentioned, principled person like Speer could become such an integral part in the Nazi party, so captivated by Hitler’s charisma and influence that he could ignore all the atrocities, the concentration camps, the slaughter of the fuehrer’s wars and devote all the country’s resources to keeping the regime in power. Albert Speer was appointed as minister for Armaments and munitions in February 1942. Speer played an invaluable role in the Nazi War Machine during the next three years of the Second World War. His effectiveness as minister for armaments and munitions led to phenomenal increases in the production of armaments, and ultimately prolonging the war for another one to two years which greatly impacted on the functioning of the War Machine. Speer’s major accomplishments as minister for armaments and munitions were the standardization of weapons and specialization of factories. Implementing a Total War policy in Germany. The mobilization of the workforce in relation to the armament production.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Albert Speer was a personal architect for Hitler also the Minister of Armaments and War Production for Nazi regime. He was the only Nazi to bear the responsibility on the crimes of his former master Hitler and the Nazi regime in the Nuremburg Trials. But he said he knew nothing about the fate of the Jews and claimed he was just focused on his ambition.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In conclusion, it is because of Albert Speer and his actions through his time in the Nazi Party, that significantly contributed to his period of national and international history. Through his Minister of Armaments role, the Germania project and, his well-known architectural skills, was he able to influence thousands of people either to follow the Nazi Rallies, or to be under his control within the workforce. It is also because of Albert Spear, Germany was able to continue fighting in the war for the length of time that occurred, however, he was also one of the main reasons for the holocaust and concentration camps. While historians praise Speer for his skills in architecture, there is a lot of evidence to prove that Speer was a sinister whom…

    • 137 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Speer survived the Nuremberg Trials, by appearing less culpable in the organisation and implementation of crimes against humanity than his fellow defendants. He accepted collective responsibility for the atrocities committed by Hitler’s regime, but denied knowledge of the final solution until May 1945, after the German surrender. This differentiated Speer from the other Nazi elite, whom knew of the persecution against the Jews. Speer argued that when he joined the Nazi party in 1931, he did not research the aims of the party, of which anti Semitism had a crucial role in the policy making of the third Reich. He expressed guilt for his naiveté and, in this extract from Inside the Third Reich and judges himself perhaps more harshly than…

    • 3605 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    <br>Speer's well structured and thought out defence shaped historical interpretation for years to come. At Nuremberg he presented himself as a pure technician and not involved in the politics or ideology of the party. He also claimed collective responsibility for crimes against Jews but also his ignorance of the Nazi intentions. As he stated at a later time: "I just stood aside and said to myself that as long as I did not personally participate it had nothing to do with me. My toleration for the anti Semitic campaign made me responsible for it." This admission of guilt won a fair amount of sympathy from the court. The reasons he gave for being with the Nazi party was that he was taken by Hitler's personality and also realised that if he was to achieve his dream as an architect he will have to sell his soul to the party. This image of Speer was to be accepted for a while by most historians and was given little attention. This was probably because Speer was a little less ‘spectacular' than Hitler's other henchmen. There were however some suspicions. John Galbraith, a member of the US team that debriefed Speer before the Nuremberg trial, said in Life magazine 1945 that Speer's claims contained "elements of fantasy". He also believed that Speer's confession was a part of his "well developed strategy of self…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is questionable whether Speer was at the Posen Meeting in 1943 as the concentration camp was mentioned at the meeting. Speer claimed to have left by then although sources suggest that this was the turning point in his faults to convict him at the Nuremburg trials for knowledge of the concentration camps and the Jewish people. Speer had said in an interview that he had “tolerated” Hitler’s anti-Semitic policies suggesting he did not know about the persecution of the Jewish people. He may not have been supporting this view but his choice to ignore it is viewed as his greatest fault and this adds to why he is counted as an important figure to German history having survived the death penalty for all his convictions at the Nuremburg trials were he pleaded innocent to two counts of murder and persecution and knowledge of the concentration camps that the Jews were involved in. Speer instead received 20 years prison sentence at the Spandau prison. This shows historians as well as others that Albert Speer’s purpose was to get to the top of the pile in the Nazi regime, to get on top of Hitler, although his virtues came along with major faults to stumble his passage. As for his Nuremburg trial convictions historian Ullrich said that “If the judges at Nuremburg had known…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Van Der Vat throughout his research and findings is very critical towards Speer. Speer is not amoral but immoral, being an active participant with knowledge of the concentration camps, the extermination of 6 million Jews and as Armaments Minister controlling and conducting slave labour. “Speer was not absent-minded, eyes-adverted, amoral non-spectator, of Nazi anti-Semitism but an active participant”. Speer was a “master actor”, living a life deceiving people and working for his own gain. Van Der Vat believed Speer was present during Himmler’s speech at the Posen conference. Himmler “directly addressed” Speer. On the issue of the Jewish Flats, Van Der Vat states Speer was “Passively tolerant or actively approving”. He believes he was aware of the situations around him, and therefore did nothing to prevent the situation from spiralling. During the Nuremburg trials, he argues “collective responsibility for the crimes of the Nazis at Nuremburg was a strategy he had been developing for some time”, creating his defence.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays