The most significant theme in Sophocles’ Antigone is whether or not the law of man conquers divine law. Amidst the play, the newly crowned king Creon proclaims that the body of Polyneices will not receive a proper burial, but instead will be publicly shamed and left to be preyed upon by wild animals. Upset with Creon’s mandate, Antigone mourns the death of both of her brothers, Polyneices and Eteocles, and gives Polyneices a proper burial so he can move on to the afterlife.…
All though later punished for her denial of the law, Antigone ultimately made the correct decision. In Ancient Greece, it was a moral code to bury anyone and everyone, friend or foe. In the play Antigone, By Sophocles, Antigone has to choose between following this ancient duty or acquiesce…
Clinicians are expected to provide medical services to help others. However, there is a debate about whether clinicians should treat friends and family, members also known as non-patients. “Treatment of non-patients is widespread, with some studies reporting nearly 100 percent of physicians engaging in this practice” (Latessa & Ray, 2005, p.42). A case was presented where a physician assistant (PA Brian) was asked to treat his supervising physician (Dr.Yarnell) for different medical conditions while prescribing multiple controlled substances. Legal standards provide vague ethical guidance regarding this issue and leave a lot of blank spaces open for clinician interpretation. In Dr.Yarnell and PA Brian’s case there were numerous ethical dilemmas that can be examined under the four ethical principles of medicine: beneficence, nonmaleficence, respect for autonomy, and justice.…
In Sophocles’ Antigone, Antigone rebels from the typical “role of a woman” by going against the beliefs of society. Ismene points out to Antigone that, “We must remember by birth that we’re women and, as such, we shouldn’t fight with men” (78-79). Antigone’s unorthodox decision to bury her brother, against the law decreed by Creon is an example of another trait a tragic hero must possess. A tragic hero does not always fit into society’s mold. This is greatly significant to the play because it presents the conflict between Antigone’s morals and society’s views. Antigone is defiant towards Creon’s law, therefore, she digs herself into a deeper hole of danger between what she believes is right and what the Thebes’ believes is right. Antigone recognizes that what she did is “wrong” in society’s eyes. However, Antigone also believes that she did not surpass the law of god. Antigone violates a law created by an unjust king, but feels that she is erroneous in God’s eyes. Antigone believes that she is in the right mind, while Creon believes that, “These views of yours—so different from the rest—” (580). It is apparent that Antigone did not care how the other members of the Theban society judged her for her…
The ethical dilemma for physicians begins with the Hippocratic Oath they take. The classical version of the Hippocratic Oath in medicine has various requirements for physicians. Among those, the physician is required to state that: "I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody if asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to that effect," (Hosseini, 2012).…
The cost of tragedy is a huge predicament in society. Having to decide between two moral wrongdoings is almost impossible. With no obvious answer, you must decide between the lesser of two evils from an ethical standpoint. While there may be tough decisions to be made, you need to ask yourself the obvious question as well as the tragic one. A situation may seem tragic, but a truly tragic situation is only when it involves moral wrongdoing. Choosing to eat at home vs eating with your friend for example would be an obvious question. While it may be tough for you decide what to do, neither of your choices are morally wrong. Nussbaum believes that most of the time when you are in the midst of a tragic question, it is because you are being dumb.…
There were three basic conflicts that caused Antigone and Creon to clash as violently as they did. First, was the conflict of the individual versus the state, in which Antigone represented the individual and Creon the king, the state. The second conflict can be described as following ones conscience and ideals versus following the law strictly. In this conflict Antigone makes decisions based on her conscience and ideals while Creon is the strict law abiding king. Finally, the main and most important discord, which is similar to the second conflict, is the debate of moral and divine law versus human law. In this most important contention Creon strictly observes human laws and Antigone follows the divine or moral laws. Creon's beliefs and his unwillingness to change ultimately cause the downfall of Creon and everyone that he cares about.…
In October 2005, a resolution was passed by The American Association of Family Physicians stated that a pharmacist’s right of conscientious objection must be reasonably accommodated (Grady, 2006). In recent years larger numbers of pharmacists have been independently choosing not to participate in patient drug therapies on the grounds of moral objection. These issues have led to legislations to accommodate both conscientious objectors and patients (Grady).…
Although to some people, morality might seem like the best option, one person’s morality isn’t usually the same to everyone else’s. Laws are set to be right and just to every person regardless of their different morality.. In Antigone, King Kreon had a different idea as to what should be done with Polyneices’ body and Antigone, his son and the people of Thebes had told him to follow the laws of the God’s. When King Kreon decides to disobey the laws the gods have set, he lost his family and learned that following laws is more important than his personal morality. Even those who decide to go against law and believe more in their personal morality are punished nowadays, that’s why prisons exist.…
A rule utilitarian decision will be to give it to the teacher. She seems to be a lost cause because of how she entered the hospital. But if the doctor was to take a decision based on her being the one who supports her family and being a school teacher who doesn 't have as many opportunities like the artist, he will be taking a rule utilitarian decision.…
The following case study is a moral dilemma in which a doctor must chose a course of action with respect to patient’s case. In this case, the doctor must consider the morality, criminality, and ethical implications of killing, abortion, farmed organs, and allowing a patient suffer when there is a cure. Then and only then, can the doctor to determine what actions are morally permissible and allow to make an informed and proper decision as to what course of action he should take.…
Due to the many ethical issues surrounding free samples of medications, they should not be prescribed to the uninsured or underinsured. The basic principle underlying utilitarianism ethics is an action is right or moral if it maximizes utility or happiness. Very simply, happiness can be explained as an absence of pain. The patient in this scenario receiving the free drug sample will not only be upset about the quality of care but also of the quality of medicine he or she is receiving. Moreover, no pharmacist is used in order to examine the patients past medical history, pinpoint certain allergies or drug interactions with the current medications the patients is using (Chimonas 2009). Also, the packaging of samples usually lacks proper labeling, leaving out the expiration date, possibly resulting in the patient to become significantly sick, hence, decreasing…
The Heinz Dilemma According to the oxford dictionary online moral dilemma is "a situation in which a difficult choice has to be made between two course of action, either of which entails transgressing a moral principle," (Oxford Dictionaries, n.d.) These moral dilemmas often occur in our daily lives and we are inflicted with making the right choice. Unfortunately, this is not an essay task, more often than not ever choice that is made will have consequence to their actions and one must decide if they can handle those consequences which may follow. Take for instance the Heinz Dilemma it is essential about a husband Mr. Heinz, who is faced with whether or not to steal the only known drug that would save his wife's live who is suffering from…
And ethical dilemma encountered in my practice setting was a case of a 68-year-old woman admitted with an overdose of metoprolol and some other medication she could not identify. During the intake in the emergency department, the patient admitted she did it on purpose because she is tired of taking care of her bedridden mother. The patient further stated that as she took the pills, she thought about jumping in front of a moving vehicle to kill herself. I believe in the fact every situation has a solution, one that is not expected but at that moment that is the best option. I believe she did have the choice of asking for help from other family members or having her mother admitted to a nursing home. I was assigned to admit and plan her care, but my thinking and moral principles led me to have…
A recent trend in drug seeking behavior has led many physicians to stop the practice of prescribing painkillers, stirring a debate on whether physicians have an ethical responsibility to treat pain even though some patients are abusing the drugs prescribed. Some argue that not prescribing painkillers is up to the physicians because it is their practice at stake. The problem with this line of thinking is that it draws an invisible line in the sand. Physicians are supposed to treat patients, not pick and choose because of potential legal liabilities, and they take an oath stating just that. Therefore, it is unethical and unacceptable for physicians to refuse…