Preview

Moral Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1178 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Moral Essay
The Divine Command Theory is a meta-ethical theory which proposes that an action’s status as morally good is equivalent to whether it is commanded by God. The theory asserts that what is moral is determined by what god commands, and that to be moral is to follow his commands.
As a Christians, I believe that my people use divine command theory approach rather than egoism or act or rule utilitarianism as a basis of the ethical systems. In Christianity, Judaism and Islam, good and bad are seen as being actually about obedience or disobedience towards god’s law, with what “ God said so” , we know what good and bad mean. Of course we still have to find out what is that god wants us to do and that is not always clear. The bible for example has 10 commandments but one of the most famous “Thou shalt not commit murder” does not tell us what counts as murder and what does not.
I believe that most Christians follow their religion’s moral rules because they obey to god. Some people might ask; “if god saves us by grace, apart from the good works that we do, why should we obey him? If there is no condemnation for those in Christ Jesus and our salvation is not in jeopardy, why should we struggle to obey?” I would say: “it’s our duty.” Through his death on the cross, Christ has purchased us, and it is only fair that we do what he says. We are children of god, and we are to do what he commands. Of course we do not obey in order to be saved. Salvation comes first, and obedience should follow. But obedience goes deeper than duty. Obedience should come from the heart, done because we want to, not grudgingly, because we have to. So why should we want to obey? There are three main reasons: faith, hope and love. In faith, we believe that god’s commands are for our own good. He loves us and wants to help us, not to give us unnecessary burdens.as our creator, he has the wisdom to know how we should live, what works best and what causes the most happiness in the long run. And we have

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Phil 1600 Ch 3 Questions

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This means that if one doesn’t obey the authority he will get punished. So moral decisions are made to avoid punishment.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apol 104 Worldview

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Question of Morality is, what is right or wrong based upon God’s scripture in the biblical worldview? Psalm 4, tells us “lift up the light of your countenance upon us, Lord” implying that what is good and bad will be impressed upon us. Genesis 3, shares with us Adam’s poor moral behavior of eating the forbidden fruit.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is Divine Command Theory? According to Emil Brunner "Genuine humanly good is found only in the unconditional, unquestioned obedience of man to God." That this is a power from God. According to Ms. Rodrigues' explanation "morality is determined entirely by God's command." I believe that it means that the only way to be a goodly and moral person is by following God's commands. That obeying human laws or human moral codes does not make you a "good person." Nevertheless, when we follow God's commands, we become people of genuine human goodness. Mr. Brunner believes that good is done for the sake of God and that we do good to please God because this is what God commands. He believes that God is in total control of our happiness and God's plan for our happiness is found in sanctions, rewards and punishments. These sanctions are the make-up of our moral code. God knows all and has a plan. We, as humans, may not know what that total plan is. If we follow the Divine Command Theory, it would not matter because the moral code dictates that we follow God's command. We are to do as God commands us and we will then be genuinely good humans. We will be good if we follow Gods commands.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another issue with any divine command morality theory is that we have no confirmation that there even is the essential God, a great deal less which God's commands are the commands of that God. There are many distinctive moral frameworks credited to God. This is so even inside of the umbrella of Christian belief in a higher power; more so when we consider different belief…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It can be well argued that the unrestricted divine command theory is aimed to explain what is right and good depending on God’s commands. To understand the unrestricted divine command theory, one must understand the Theory of Right Conduct, which encompasses the nature of what makes an action right or wrong, and the Theory of Value, which helps explain intrinsic goodness and badness in relation to God’s commands. Intrinsic means a thing has its value in itself or “as it is”. It does not represent value like a dollar bill, but is the value. The Theory of Right Conduct states “An action A is obligatory if and only if (and because) God commands that we A” (Timmons 24). An obligatory action is an action one should morally do and is often referred to as required. “An action A is wrong if…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Exodus 20, God creates moral order. God's way of separation and categorization is a model for human morality. Morality divides up actions into right and wrong, good and bad. To be moral is to categorize actions and…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first ethical theory is Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is the ethical theory that describes how the moral value or worth of an action is determined by how much benefit is gained from that action. It is measured by not only the amount of benefit gained but also the amount of people with benefits in the process. This theory hopes to provide guidance when choosing a course of action. Utilitarianism is divided into two groups based off of how they apply the theory. A Rule Utilitarian believes that the action is right if it results in happiness of great benefit (Munson, 2009). For example, the commandment, “thou shall not kill” is very straight forward and doesn’t leave room for interpretation. Someone who follows Rule Utilitarianism would strictly follow this rule by never committing murder or killing any living creature. An Act Utilitarian would decipher the commandment according to its greatest benefit. Act utilitarianism is the belief that an action is right if it is better than all of the other options as long as it yields the best results. In other words, there may be situations in which breaking the rules may be the best option. Breaking the commandment, “ thou shall not kill” may seem wrong when looking at it from the surface, but if it is done to save the life’s of others it may yield the best result. The absolute that applies to Utilitarianism is the Bible. 2 Corinthians 9:7 says, “Each one must give as he has decided in his heart; not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves…

    • 1598 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Divine Command Theory

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Perhaps the easiest counterargument to the Divine Command Theory is the existence of atheists that are capable of living moral lives. So if morals can exist without a belief in God, then God must not be a requirement for morals. Others arguments against the Divine Command Theory include the arbitrariness of God’s decision on good and wrong and the reason that the theory establishes for living morally. Stating that an act is wrong simply because God said so does not offer any reason as to why the act is actually wrong. And by not knowing the reasoning and simply following the commands because they came from God the arbitrariness of His commands are exposed. The flaw with moral based on God’s mandates are that “he always could have commanded the opposite” (Rachels 53). Not only could the commandments could have been reversed, God’s commandments could change at any moment and, according to the Divine Command Theory, that would cause any previously established moral rule to be subject to change. To eliminate the seemingly capricious nature of God’s choice between right and wrong, then God must use some form of reasoning to form his commands as “God’s commands are arbitrary if He has no reason to command one act rather than another; but if He does have reasons for His…

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ten Commandments are the clear example of God setting the standards of what is morally right and wrong. We follow these laws that God has set because we believe that they show us are sins and if we follow these laws that we will be reward towards the light. These Commandments show us the righteous side of being a human being, and that we should follow them because God has set them however God was the one who gave us free will to do what we want but with this free will we must follow what is right in life for example ‘Thou shalt not kill’ this is quite obverses because we know that killing is wrong however some people do it because they.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russ Shafer- Landau has presented his ideas against this concept that the ethical subjectivity can be only related to the God. He says that this cannot be true because the command of God is anything but that is arbitrary in nature. The command of God cannot be doubtful or illogical. There must be some reasoning behind the particular command of the God that could guide the human being. The other actions performed by the human beings are their own responsibility which cannot be blamed to God. The commands are the foundations or bases of the moral actions and morality that is the essence of the ethics and ethical subjectivity. The responsibilities of arbitrary actions are mistakenly performed by the people or it is their won will that triggers them perform such actions and the God is not responsible for those actions and behaviors. The argument presented by the author Russ Shafer- Landau is that if the divine command theory is considered to be true then we must believe that the God has some kind of objective…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics: Moral Absolutes

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Christians base their beliefs in moral absolutes through the Bible. Of course, you cannot solve all moral decisions by referring to the Bible but there sufficient guidelines provided to give us a sense of what is morally right. These guidelines are the Decalogue also known as the Ten Commandments and tat is how specific the authority is.…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Divine Command Theory

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Divine Command Theory states that whatever God says is so, simply because God said so. Meaning X is morally right because God says so and Y is morally wrong because God says so. This theory states that things are wrong or right simply because God says, not because of what we consider to be morally right or wrong, but just because of what God says.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Essay

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    ‘Religion and/or moral principles are a hindrance within medical ethics? Examine and comment on this claim, with reference to the topic you have investigated’.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics Essay

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The similarities between the three are that they determine good and bad traits about a person, and with the determination of their actions, it also determines the characteristic of the person which is virtue ethics. Utilitarianism is similar that finds the good in a person. One issue is that it avoids finding the bad in a person. With the deontological ethics the product of the action is good not bad. It holds acts that are morally obligatory for consequences made by human actions. The differences between the three ethics are, utilitarianism is an act that focuses on consequences. Virtue ethics is the character of a person not the actions of a person. Deontological ethics is a reflection of a person’s morality, which is ultimately a combination of that person’s attitude.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Essay

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This essay will discuss ethics and why ethics is vital to an organization. From the very first day our parents taught why ethics is critical to how individuals are looked upon as citizens. The same ethics and moral principles taught to each person in the home is the same principles that organizations should strive to emphasize to their employees.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays