Preview

Moral Relativism In The Film 'No Country For Old Men'

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1590 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Moral Relativism In The Film 'No Country For Old Men'
No Country For Old Men

The choices a person makes can affect them in so many ways, it can be positive or negative depending on what they believe to be right or wrong. It's the decisions we have made in the past and will make in the future that determine what type of people we want to be, for example, We have all been in that situation where we had to make a choice about whether or not to steal something when we were younger. We could choose to make the right decision and not steal or steal and risk the consciences. For me this was when I was about 5 or 6 years old and was at my friends house. While my friend when to the bathroom I waited in his room and could not stop staring at this Michael Keaton Batman action figure that was on top
…show more content…
Moral relativism is a person's positions on what's right or wrong based on a person's individual choice, everyone can decide on what is right for themselves and in this case Anton Chigurh has decided that killing people in order to get what he wants is the right thing to do. Anton Chigurh has certain principles that he has decided as being what's right, an example of this comes from Mr. Carson Wells while he was speaking with Llewelyn Moss at the hospital. “No No. No. You don't understand. You can't make a deal with him. Even if you gave him the money he'd still kill you. He's a peculiar man. You could even say that he has principles. Principles that transcend money or drugs or anything like that. He's not like you. He's not even like me.” (Carson Wells). Anton Chigurh has his own views on what's right or wrong, his principles are what he believes to be right and nothing will convince him otherwise because that's what he decided was his position on morality. Another example of how Anton's moral philosophy is Moral relativism is when he went to the gas station and decided to let faith decide whether or not the gas station attendant should live or die with the flip of a coin. Anton explains how the coin has been traveling for 22 years to get there and now that it's there it’s either heads or tails and he has to call it without knowing what's he risking. …show more content…
As a police officer he makes sure everyone is obeying the laws that society has deemed as being right. Ed Tom Bell's moral philosophy in the film is The Socratic Definition because he is trying to find the absolute truth about this murderer who has killed a lot of people including Llewelyn Moss, he tried to protect Llewelyn Moss, and -------------. Ed Tom Bell in the film is trying to find a merciless killer who has killed a lot of people and was trying to kill Llewelyn Moss and take the two million dollars that he found. Ed Tom Bell’s moral philosophy being The Socratic Definition, is trying to find the truth about who this murderer is and throughout the film. He investigates the crime scene in the desert, Llewellyn's home, and the motel where Llewelyn was killed trying to find the truth about this relentless killer. Furthermore, Ed Tom Bell knows that killing is wrong as a human being and a law enforcement officer so he tried to protect Llewelyn Moss from Anton the psychopathic murderer who was trying to kill him. The sheriff investigates Llewelyn's wife in order to find Llewelyn so he could protect him from Anton the person who was after him. However he failed at his attempt and didn't get there in time to save Llewellyn from the drug cartel who got to him before Anton did.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Within the American society there are a huge amount of different cultures that certain cultural virtues held by some groups will not be acted upon due to the laws of the United States. The beliefs of Lenn Goodman are based on the history of moral knowledge and what many of us as Americans think are right (Goodman, 2010). There are universal moral requirements as we have witnessed over time throughout history. The claim of certain rights and wrongs has been a forewarning for battles since the beginning of time.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1860 and 1861 eleven of the southern states declared their secession from the Union creating the Confederate States. This act caused widespread conflict and the Civil War followed quickly after. The Southern states were led to secede from the Union by many different factors, including the question of slavery, the election of Abraham Lincoln, and the “right of self government.”…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    ETHICAL (MORAL) RELATIVISM

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Presently, Americans are comfortable relating ethics to individuality. Often times, American citizens expresses their right of freedoms to enhance their own sense of ethics or relativity. In defining relativism, moral principles are a matter of personal feelings and individual preference. As for individual moral relativism, figuring out what is moral and immoral in specific circumstances differs according to the person. On another note, moral relativists have a disbelief in universal truths or common law.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Moral relativism is one’s perception of what is acknowledged to be morally just or unjust depending on accepted demeanor. Certain behaviors and manners that a specific culture may consider to be acceptable, another culture may consider to be unethical. In such an instance, neither one of the cultures would be incorrect. Morals are culturally defined in that it originates from the root as to what is considered socially acceptable.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rachels is in agreement with cultural relativist in recognizing that we should keep an open minded approach when making ethical judgments about other societies. His thoughts differ from cultural relativist in that he believes that there exist objective moral standards. He puts forward this motion well on two fronts: first, he presents a major flaw in the way that cultural relativist think; second, he puts forward three arguments that support objective moral standards.…

    • 1686 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    What they carried themselves with dignity, poise, and a kind of moral; a moral that has been tainted throughout life going against their own ideals of what is right and acceptable. For if a person’s life continuously seems to be filled with morals, without a moral less action, do not believe them. ‘Morals’ is defined as a person’s standard of behaviors or beliefs of what is and what is not acceptable for them to do. Whether in a situation of which a person’s life is in jeopardy, the way they were raised, hardships, or just the person’s origin, people’s “standard of behaviors” change from person to person. Being a research on human emotions, I looked into what exactly affects and determines a person’s morals.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated Bibliography

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Moral Relativism is what determines whether the action or conduct is right or wrong. This article states how from a moral absolutist standpoint, some things are always right, while some things are always wrong no matter how much one tries to rationalize them. At the same time, this article defines moral relativism as the belief that conflicting moral beliefs are true. What this means is that what you think is morally right, may not be morally right for someone else. Basically relativism replaces the search for absolute truth. Moral relativism and moral absolutism are means of deriving the morality of the character from The Road. They are tools to use to judge the characters actions, if they can be considered morally correct or morally unethical.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethical relativism is a concept in which most simple minded individuals adhere to. According to definition in the chapter, ethical relativism is the normative theory that what is right is what the culture or individual says is right. Shaw argues that it is not very plausible to say that ethical relativism is determined by what a person thinks is right and wrong. He gives reason that it “collapses the distinction between thinking something is right and it’s actually being right.” Ethical relativism may be justified occasionally. William H. Shaw examines ethical relativism by providing comprehensive examples on why relativism is a weak method in gaining morals.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moral Relativism is the thought that the moral beliefs held by individuals is influenced and dependent on the culture in which they live in considers tolerable. Hence, what is considered morally appropriate in a single society perhaps is perceived as immoral in a different society. In actuality they both maybe right as they have distinct creators resulting in different laws, diversity, and possibly religious views of each other. Ruth Benedict defends the theory of moral relativism in her article A Defense of Moral Relativism from The Journal of General Psychology. In contrast, William B. Irvine author of Confronting Relativism feels in a few swift examples people can be talked out of their views on moral…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Moral relativism did not become a prominent topic in philosophy or elsewhere until the 20th century. Moral relativism is the making of an excuse for the action done. Behaviors should not be dismissed under certain circumstances. Moral relativism is dangerous and illogical which can be seen through murders, abortion, and lying.…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This essay will justify that relativist theories give no convincing reason why people should be good. The main problem with relativism is that what is good and what is bad can always change depending on the person so you can never reach a final answer. There are also arguments where absolutes are necessary.…

    • 808 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Intro To Ethics

    • 2258 Words
    • 6 Pages

    2. Moral Relativism: believe that what is good for one might not be good for another. No one is wrong; everyone is right in his or her own mind. There is no real resolution in this thought.…

    • 2258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Moral Relativism

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Moral relativism is often equated with cultural relativism. However, anthropologists cringe at this notion, as defended by Thomas Johnson in his essay, “Cultural Relativism: Interpretations of a Concept.” Johnson argues that true cultural relativism should not “…prevent an educated person from taking a stand on a variety of moral issues…” (Johnson 794). Rather, cultural relativism is a tool for the objective study of a different culture and leads “…to a much stronger notion of moral values, values that can and should be acted upon…” (Johnson 795). This view differs from Bendedict’s moral relativism in that while cultural relativism is a tool from which moral attitudes and actions may stem, moral relativism maintains all cultures are equal, and therefore all cultures and cultural practices must be tolerated. Benedict is not alone in her biased presumptions. In his article, “In Defense of Relativism,” Frank Oppenheim asserts,…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ball, C., and A. Tschoegl, 1982, The decision to establish a foreign bank branch or subsidiary: an application of binary classification procedures, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 17, 411-424.…

    • 19168 Words
    • 77 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the early nineteenth century, both China and Japan enforced policies restricting foreign trade in order to avoid industrialization and western ideas, but after both societies experienced foreign invasions and unequal treaties being established by foreigners, Japan began to industrialize and became imperialists trying to create an empire, while China differed in that the people wanted reform and government restrained the reformation of their society, therefore causing multiple rebellions and overall the collapse of their empire.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays