E:CO Issue Vol. 11 No. 3 2009 pp. 1-15
Academic
Understood Complexity: Ibsen’s ‘An Enemy of the People’—On Complexity, Sense-Making,
Understanding, and Exit/Voice/Loyalty
Tom Eide
Diakonhjemmet University College, NOR
‘Understood complexity’ is a term of Albert Hirschman (1976) whose economicpolitical theory of ‘exit’ (‘vote with your feet’) versus ‘voice’ (feedback or use your influence for change) (1970), has often been used to (try to) understand whistleblowing (Alford, 2001; Maclagen, 1998).
Real complexity is not linear and cannot be adequately studied an model of ‘A causes
B’. Complexity entails ‘A causes B’ in a situation wherein ‘B causes A’. Bateson in his ‘ecology of the mind’ understood the circularity of the hermeneutic of complexity; while Weick did not in his theory of sense-making. I argue in this article, via an examination of a play of Ibsen, that circular thinking spiraling towards new insight(s) is much more a possibility of literature (studies) than of social science.
Social complexity theory needs (at least partially) I believe to methodologically merge with literary studies.
Introduction: An Enemy of the People:
A Drama on Whistleblowing
L
iterature is an indirect phenomenon. On the one hand, it is a product of the author’s artistic imagination; on the other, it represents aspects of our lives and the world in which we live. I will explore Ibsen’s representation of complexity in his realistic drama
An enemy of the people (1882).
The plot takes its point of departure in the discovery that the water at a Spa is polluted and in a concerned employee’s unsuccessful attempt to make the management take action to stop the pollution. The plot develops as a case of whistleblowing. Ibsen exposes the organizational response to the whistleblower, resulting in the whistleblower’s persecution and in retaliation against him. To my knowledge,
the
References: Alford, C.F. (2001). Whistle-Blowers: Broken Lives and Organizational Power, ISBN 9780801487804 (2002). Alford, C.F. (2007). “Whistle-blower narratives: The experience of choiceless choice,” Social Research, Aristotle (1965). “On the art of poetry,” in T.S. Aristotle (1989). “Poetics,” in D.H. Richter (ed.), The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology, ISBN 9780226039053. Bateson, G. (1980). Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity, ISBN 9780553242836. Bok, S. (1981). “Blowing the whistle,” in J.L. Fleishman, L. Liebman, and M.H. Moore (eds.), P ublic E:CO Vol (2007). Whistleblowing: Law and Practice, ISBN 9780199299584. Calland, R. and Dehn, G. (eds.) (2005) .Whistleblowing Around the World: Law, Culture and Practice, ISBN 9781919798561. Dawson, S. (2000). “Whistleblowing: A broad definition and some issues for Australia,” http:// Eide, T. (2001). Ibsens Dialogkunst [Ibsen’s Art of Dialogue], ISBN 9788215001463. Eide, T. (2004). “Ibsen’s ethical method,” http:// www.ibsensociety.liu.edu/conferencepapers/ Hemmer, B. (2003). Ibsen: Kunstnerens Vei [Ibsen: The Artist’s Path], ISBN 9788241902796. Hannan, M.T. and Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational Ecology, ISBN 9780674643499 (1993). Hirschman, A.O. (1970). Exit, Voice and Loyalty: R esponses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and Hirshman, A.O. (1978). “Exit voice and the state,” World Politics, ISSN 1086-3338, 31(1): 90-107. Ibsen, H. (1882). A n Enemy of the People [ En Folkefiende], The Oxford Ibsen, Volume VI, J.W. McFarlane (ed. & trans.), London: Oxford University Press, 1960. Ibsen, H. (1882). En Folkefiende [An Enemy of the People], København: Gyldendal. Johnson, R.A. (2002). W histleblowing. When it Works, and Why, ISBN 9781588261397. Maclagen, P.W. (1998). M anagement and Mo ralit y: A Developmental Perspective , ISBN 9780803976795. Miceli, M.P., Near, J.P. and Dworkin, T.M. (2008). Sørhaug, T. (2007). “The drama of society: Capitalism, labor and love,” Organization Studies, ISSN 1741-3044, 28(8): 1285-1296. Weick, K.E., Sutcliffe, K.M. and Obstfeld, D. (2005).