When Rainsford made a lot of different trials, to throw General Zaroff but he still found him in the tree.…
Immediately upon arriving at Zaroff’s chateau, he greets Ivan at the door by saying, “Don’t be alarmed. I’m no robber. I fell off a yacht. My name is Sanger Rainsford of New York City” (4). Since Rainsford is only looking to find help, he communicates with Ivan at the chateau to tell him that he is not from here and needs and would like a shelter to be in for the night. Even though the quotes state that Zaroff is an insane individual, he reassures Rainsford by telling him “Come,” [Rainsford] “We can talk later. Now you want clothes, food, rest. You shall have them. This a most restful spot” (4). Before bombarding Rainsford about his hunting “passion” Zaroff wanted to take good care of his guest while he was with him at his chateau on the island. Thus, Rainsford and Zaroff, two different characters are distinct from each other they share a common similarity…
Rainsford wants to defend himself, which is why he would execute General Zaroff. Perhaps the most obvious piece of evidence states "Good God, General Zaroff, what you speak of is murder,"(lines 381-382). To spice it up, instead of hunting animals, General Zaroff hunts humans, and chases them. Rainsford thinks that it is a joke. General Zaroff has humans in his basement waiting for the hunting game to begin. It is clear that since he kills humans, he will probably kill Rainsford. In order to stop this 'dangerous' game, Rainsford has to kill General Zaroff. This also supports that he killed General Zaroff because he wanted to save the peoples lives that were about to die for no reason. One of the most damaging pieces of evidence is "The fellow…
Ultimately Zaroff can be characterized as Mysterious and cruel. First off one way Zaroff is mysterious is he already knows who Rainsford is without ever meeting each other before. Conelle page 44, “It is a very great pleasure and honor to welcome Mr. Sanger Rainsford, the celebrated hunter, to my home… I am General Zaroff.” As you can see from this quote Zaroff is excited to meet Rainsford and immediately wants to get to know him better. My second reason is Zaroff acts strange in general around Rainsford. Conelle page 44 “The menacing look in his eyes did not change… a black uniform trimmed with gray astrakhan.” By this quote you can tell Rainsford is feeling uncertain and curious of him. You can also tell by his first reaction he is in some…
When thinking about it, Rainsford knew he could wait one night before doing any damage. Twenty-four hours later, Rainsford starts thinking about his attack strategies on the captives. He goes back up to General Zaroff’s bedroom and flips over the dead corpse on the ground. As Rainsford loots the metallic pistol off Zaroff, one of the prisoners walks up behind and said, “Rainsford?”…
Zaroff directly states, “ I hunt the scum of the earth: sailors from tramp ships-lassars, blacks, Chinese, whites, mongrels- a thoroughbred horse or hound is worth more than a score of them.”(Richard Connell 5) The general also explains to Rainsford how this is the only worthy opponent left that still intrigues him and gives him the thrill of the hunt. Mainly because they are the only quarry that can have reason versus the other quarries who only have instinct. Consequently Rainsford was the next prey the general had in mind. Zaroff says that, “ Instinct is no match for reason.”(Richard Connell 5) The final way that the reader can analyze Zaroff’s thrill seeking trait is his ability to understand his limits, and know that a hunt is only exciting if it’s prey is a contest to his abilities. This can be inferred in the story when Zaroff tracked Rainsford through the forest in the dark, and when he did find Rainsford, he simply turned and walked away with his smile on his face. The reader could infer and Rainsford said, “The general was playing with him! The general was saving him for another day's sport.”(Richard Connell 10) This shows the reader that killing his own prey is of no enjoyment to Zaroff unless it is a challenge. This is why Zaroff did not kill Rainsford the first time, because he is not…
“Evan, I have to tell you something!” For a second Rainsford hesitated, but he chose to continue. “General Zaroff is very dangerous. He shoots men. I survived his hunt, but I don’t know what he might do now. Remember, Ivan, Zaroff’s previous assistant. He had to help Zaroff hunt his victim, but he died under one of my traps. Even if you don’t get hurt, do you even want to help Zaroff kill people? It is a crime and you are being an accomplice! It is also wrong to not tell on…
How would you feel if somebody hunts you down the forest or come. The Most Dangerous game and High Noon are both American classics and they both texts play hunting. Both main characters in the text get hunted. Both characters in text survive. Both texts are similar in some way and different in some way. Although High Noon and The Most Dangerous Game have similarities about what happens when the main character gets hunted, patterns in the stories are different.…
his energy” (13). Rainsford is making a trap to throw off Zaroff so that he could get away from him and get more time to hide. Once Zaroff came he ended up getting and had to get his wound dressed. Rainsford is also intelligent because he knows better ways of getting around the island “Rainsford!” screamed the general. How in God’s name did you get here? Swam, said Rainsford. I found it quicker than walking through the jungle” (15). When Rainsford has to get around the island to find Zaroff he decides it is much faster to swim and then once he got there he found Zaroff. And then they started…
In the most Dangerous Game, Rainsford goes against General Zaroff's society and way of life. He knows it’s not right to kill people. He knows he won’t become a person like general Zaroff. He went against what society's goal was for him. Why…
People today love to play videogames. In fact, it is estimated that 66 percent of people in America play videogames. Half of households in America have at least one game console. Some households have more than one game console. Additionally, many people play videogames on their cell phone or computer.…
There is no denial that Video Games play a big role in modern society. It is a fun and enjoyable activities which millions of people practice every day. The gaming industry is one of the fastest industry in the last decade and the attraction of video games toward the public is growing more and more powerful. According to Gartner, an economic research term, global video game sales reached $111.1 billion in 2015. In 2013, computer and video game companies posted strong overall sales in the United States, with revenues exceeding $21 billion as entertainment software companies delivered well-paying jobs and revenue to state and local economies across the nation. (Meulen, R. V., & Riverra, J. (2013, October 29). Gartner Says Worldwide Video Game…
True or False: Violent videogames cause children to become more aggressive. Sorry, that was a trick question. Despite much bandying of statistics and loud talking by critics on both sides of the argument, the real answer is that there is no real answer—at least not one that’s been proved scientifically (Zipp). Video games are an appealing target for a public figure in search of a crusade. Movies and music have energetic advocates, but it’s hard to find anyone who will defend games for their artistic value, or even on the grounds of freedom of expression. Usually the strongest argument made for games is that they are harmless fun (Koffler). Nevertheless legislators are drafting self-righteous bills that practically beg to be overturned in court. Democratic Gov. Rod Blagojevich asserts that “ninety-eight percent of the games considered suitable by the industry for teenagers contain graphic violence” (Koffler). Most information about the topic in the media is incorrect. “In fact most of the information in the popular press about the effects of violent videogames is wrong” (Zipp). There is no real evidence that shows violence in video games cause violent behavior in children. There may not ever be a reasonable answer to how the two are related, but the question if violence should be banned from videogames (media) is a serious topic today.…
Most of people like to play video game, but have you heard that our state senators and governor try to pass a law that stop selling violent video game? Actually, government takes this action because violent video game can effect on children. Therefore, my topic is violent video game should not be banned.…
Video games, what many see as a time consuming, a waste of time and money, can have a violent affect on the human mind. Now, video games can be fun and we all see that they can be shared with people of all ages. Any adventure game such as; "Mario", to any first person shooter such as "Call of Duty" can all have a impact on anyone 's lives if allowed. Video games can be used for family fun time or a party too. Many view gaming as a waste of time or at healthy doses can allow people such as you and I to gain a skill?…