Preview

Most Important Supreme Court Cases

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
511 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Most Important Supreme Court Cases
This is the most important election in the history of the United States. Even more important than the elections of 1800, 1860, and 1932. The future of the United States hangs in balance, and this is largely because of the current situation of the Supreme Court. The balance of the Supreme Court is currently three conservative justices and four liberal justices, along with one justice who often votes conservative. The next president will probably appoint at least one, and up to four or five new Supreme Court Justices. This will shift the balance of power in the Court for probably the next 50 or 60 years. With all of the very important decisions that the Supreme Court will have to make in the near future, the fate of the country may fall into its hands. These decisions will include the fate of the disastrous Obamacare, issues of gun control, net neutrality, and many other decisions that could lead to the loss of America’s freedom. Some of these decisions could make significant changes to the way that the first second and fourth amendments are interpreted. If Hillary Clinton is elected president, she has made it very clear that she will appoint …show more content…
The need for a conservative judge on the Supreme Court is greater now than it has ever been. With the passing of the great justice Antonin Scalia, the court is in a more dangerous position than ever before. If the four hardcore progressive judges are joined by another, and maybe two or three more in the next 4-8 years, the constitution and the American way of life as we know it may disappear. If Hillary Clinton is elected president, she’s made it very obvious that the justice she will appoint will fit this billing. She hasn’t yet released a full list of the people that she would consider, but the fact that she proposes appointing Barack Obama shows exactly the type of justice that she

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Before the election, if President Obama was not able to get the Senate to approve his United States Supreme Court applicant, the next president would potentially be responsible for filling the vacant spots on the court over the term due to possible retirements and deaths. If a Republican is elected president, the court could continue to issue decisions that are favorable to conservatives in the many cases it hears. If a Democrat is elected president, the court could shift towards a more liberal direction. How the new president forms the court will differ depending on which party controls the Senate after the…

    • 103 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    April 27, 2009, Sonia Sotomayor was informed about the possibility to be nominated as Supreme Court Justice if David Souter were to retire. Davis Souter’s plans to retire we leaked on April 30, 2009, leading to early attention for Sotomayor’s nominee possibility as the new Supreme Court Justice. Sotomayor was informed of President Barack Obama choice on May 25. He then nominated her on May 26, 2009. When Sonia was nominated, history was made for the American court system; she became the second jurist to be appointed for three different judicial positions all by different Presidents. Sotomayor’s nomination matched closely with Obama’s campaign and got congradulations from Democrats and liberals. The greatest disapproval of her nomination came from Republicans.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Marbury vs Madison case would have to be one of the most important cases in Supreme Court history. The Marbury vs Madison cases was one of the first cases in U.S. history to ever to apply the principle of Judicial review the Judicial review had the power of federal courts to void acts of Congress in conflict with the Constitution , which was written by Chief Justice John Marshall. How it had all started was in 1803 in John Adams last few hours of office John Adams had appointed Marbury and many other judges in his last few hours of office. Republicans argued that these appointments were aimed at maintaining Federalist power. When Thomas Jefferson finally took office he ordered his secretary of states James Maddison to cease the work of…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the years 1952 to 1969 Earl Warren was selected as President of the Supreme court. The Warren Court issued multiple rulings that were challenged in the context of criminal investigations. Warren along with seventeen members in court played an important role in some decisions that were approved. These decisions affected the change of a more conservative court. The Warren Court showed a more liberal outlook. Among these judges were some who were firm and responsible in the decisions for their opinions. To conclude, to this day the Supreme Court has a very important role in the American legal system and this is due to the term that their decisions become law, affecting the following cases throughout the…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It goes back to the election of 1800, when Thomas Jefferson of democrat republicans beat the federalists of John Adams. One of the most historic U.S supreme court cases to begin to emerge and develop an a effect on U.S history today was the case of William Marbury, v. James Madison. Explaining the origins and background of the case, I will discuss the major constitutional issues it raised while outlining the major points of the courts decision and the significance of the decision.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Monumental Court Cases

    • 1731 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. By the mid-1850s, sectional conflict over the extension of slavery into the Western territories threatened to tear the nation apart.With Congress sharply divided, reflecting the divisions in the nation, the Supreme Court took the unusual step of hearing the case of a fugitive slave suing for his freedom. Intended to be the definitive ruling that would settle the controversy threatening the Union for good, the case instead produced a divisive decision that pushed the nation one step closer toward the precipice of civil war. John Marshall, in his time the single most influential advocate for strong National Government, had died in 1835. President Andrew Jackson appointed Roger B. Taney (pronounced Tawney). During his tenure as Chief Justice, Taney upheld strong national power, but with some modifications. Taney endorsed what is known as “dual sovereignty,” which implies that State and federal governments are “foreign” to each other; each is sovereign in its own right. By 1857, Taney presided over a Court that had expanded to nine justices and was divided—four Northerners and five Southerners, including Taney, sat on the bench.…

    • 1731 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The fear that stems from this is that if the court is seen as constantly not being taken seriously by Congress, then, what Hall argues: salient cases are the most significant, and will begin to damage the Court’s diffuse support. Instead of being more worried about, as the rational anticipation model specific cases being overturned specifically in statutory cases, they are more concerned with maintaining institutional integrity in constitutional…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Senate Pros And Cons

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kende argues that by only having eight members on the supreme court when they go to vote on important topics soon the vote could end up a tie. He brings up how there is a federal law stating there should be nine members on the supreme court, so that the court can resolve controversial issues. Kende also brings up that the senate is nullifying one of the president’s constitutional powers by not voting and holding a hearing for President Obama’s nominee. He finally brings up how the senate doesn’t want to do this during an election year, but that numerous other nominees have been voted on during the election…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is confidence in the men and women who administer the judicial system that is the true backbone of the rule of law. Time will one day heal the wound to that confidence that will be inflicted by today ' s decision. One thing, however, is certain. Although we may never know with complete certainty the identity of the winner of this year ' s Presidential election, the identity of the loser is perfectly clear. It is the Nation ' s confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian of the rule of law.” Through this statement it is obvious that Justice Stevens believes that the Federal Courts has no place in interfering on state voter laws and that the decision that was made by the majority of US Supreme Court Justices will negatively influence the perception of the Supreme Court. Justice Stevens is supported by Justice Breyer: “…the Court is not acting to vindicate a fundamental constitutional principle, such as the need to protect a basic human liberty. No other strong reason to act is present. Congressional statutes tend to obviate the need. And, above all, in this highly politicized matter, the appearance of a split decision runs the risk of undermining the public ' s confidence in the Court itself. That confidence is a public treasure. It has…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since his appointment in 1986 by former President Ronald Reagan, former Associate Justice Antonin Scalia served as the Supreme Court’s most renowned conservative. Acting as a sort of conservative judicial giant in the world of American politics, Justice Scalia’s appointment provided a beacon of hope for the political conservatives of the 1980’s, up until his recent death in February 13, 2016. He accomplished many great things in his tenure, and he is perhaps most remembered for his written opinions, which brought much public attention to the Supreme Court and its actions, in a way that has never been achieved by his contemporaries. In fact, he has been a tremendous influence on how Americans view the law and the constitution, from those interested…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clarence Thomas is the second colored male justice to serve on the U.S Supreme Court. I wanted to write about Clarence Thomas because i was fascinated how he overcame racial barriers, why he rarely asked questions in court, also his opinion as a U.S Supreme Court justice.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    armbands was a silent form of expression and that students do not have to give…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The modern civil rights movement has been affected by three very important Supreme Court cases. The first infamous case was the Dred Scott v. Sanford decision which dreadfully took away the rights of African Americans. Then the case of Plessy v. Ferguson was held in 1896 which had a major impact on the civil rights movement. This case decided that African Americans were “separate but equal”. Then finally the last infamous case was the Board v. the Board of Education which overruled the case of Plessy v. Ferguson. These cases made a huge dent on the civil rights movement and the equality laws we have instilled today.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Supreme Court of the United States was created by the Article Three, Section One of the Constitution and plays an incredibly important role in the balance of power within the United States. To that extent, it’s important to know the judicial philosophies of the judges who sit on the highest court in the United States. These philosophies are responsible for influencing lives of Americans depending on how they are recognized and implemented. It becomes even more imperative to understand with the knowledge that the court itself appoints a new justice, on average of every two years. (Regan, 2015, p. 18) With how influential their cases can be, it’s also important to understand how it can affect the nation as a whole, when those philosophies…

    • 1965 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Life Tenure

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During their tenure, a Justice will be able to continue learning and understanding the law, so that in every situation they know what is constitutional and unconstitutional. Confucius once said, “Study the past if you would define the future.” The decisions of Supreme Court Justices have led to many new laws. However, those decisions are made by justices who have been doing that for a while. These Supreme Court Justices understand our past, the decisions, laws, and consequences, and know how to act upon that because of their prolonged tenure as justices. Under no circumstance does anybody just stop learning, so Justices will be ripe with knowledge until their time is done, they choose to step down, or are impeached. Therefore, Supreme Court Justices life tenure helps them understand and master their role in the Supreme…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays