Preview

Motion to Quash Qualified Theft/Distinction from Carnapping

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2115 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Motion to Quash Qualified Theft/Distinction from Carnapping
Republic of the Philippines
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT xxxxx Judicial Region
Branch xxxx
Cauayan City, Isabela

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff, Criminal Case No. xxxxx For: QUALIFIED THEFT -versus-

MAxxxxxxxx Accused. x--------------------------------------x MOTION TO QUASH

COMES NOW, the accused through the Public Attorney’s Office, by the undersigned counsel and unto this Honorable Court most respectfully moves for the quashal of the Information in the above-entitled case and in support thereof alleges:

1. That the accused has been indicted in two (2) Informations filed before the Honorable Court– for Violation of Anti-Carnapping Law in Criminal Case No. 7497 and Qualified Theft in Criminal Case No. 7496;

2. That the two charges arose out from a single incident and with single criminal intent which was the stealing or taking away without the knowledge and consent of the owner of one unit tricycle, which necessarily includes both the motorcycle and its sidecar, on single place and occasion, that is, on September 8, 2011 in the City of Cauayan, Isabela, Philippines and that the singularity of intent cannot be modified by the fact that the sidecar of the tricycle was subsequently detached from the motorcycle;

3. That under Rule 117, Section 3(f), of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the accused may move to quash the complaint or information on the ground “that more than one offense is charged except when a single punishment for various offenses is prescribed by law”. Hence, this motion.

DISCUSSIONS/ARGUMENTS

4. In an Information for QUALIFIED THEFT filed by City Prosecutor Rudy J. Cabrera dated October 4, 2011 herein accused was indicted as follows:

The undersigned Prosecutor accuses MARISON DELOS SANTOS, of the crime of QUALIFIED THEFT, defined under Article 310 and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Holding: Speelman should have been granted a preliminary injunction, and her substansive and procedural due process was indeed…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Philip B. Royster Case

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On Tuesday, 01/03/207, at 1442 hours, I, Deputy Stacy Stark #1815 was dispatched to take a telephone report for a theft. I spoke to the victim, Philip B. Royster (M/W, DOB: 05/04/1961). Royster stated someone stole numerous tools from his shop trailers parked on Boat Dock Rd. I requested to meet Royster in person at the location to take the report, he agreed.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As to paragraph 1, it is hereby admitted in part. Defendant resides in said county. As for the other allegations, Defendant does not have sufficient knowledge to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations, and on that basis, denies the allegations.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    from the decision of the Commission to the District Court of Bernalillo County pursuant to s 59-9-6(K),…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: In October of 1970, the defendant, her boyfriend, and two other people drove near the area of St. Ignatius Retreat Home. The defendant was a passenger and to her understanding, they were headed for Christopher Morely…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. Briefly – state the facts of this case, using the information found in the case in LexisNexis. (5 points)…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ADJ Midterm

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    in question. The defense counsel thereafter motioned for a trial order of dismissal. In addition, a…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    • After all procedural steps are complete you will be put into a holding cell, do…

    • 1305 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Law 208 Week 1 Assignment

    • 4250 Words
    • 17 Pages

    |Court Observation Report |10% |Internals – |1, 3, 5 |1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 |2 page report |…

    • 4250 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Memorandum of Law

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Defendant Cruz Estrada submits this memorandum of law in support of defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence seized from the defendant’s purse and to suppress the evidence collected from the audio recording of Cruz Estrada’s conversation with Luis Briones.…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cj227 Unit 4 Project

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Since John was in custody, what are the procedural steps the police were required to take once John began to incriminate himself? The police have no obligation to stop John Doe from making any statements. “Excited Utterance” made by a defendant before being questioned are admissible as statements given under Miranda advisement. Once the police begin to question John Doe regarding the theft, then they are required to read or provide Mr. Doe with his Miranda Warnings. Miranda rights (Miranda rule, Miranda warning) n. the requirement set by the U. S. Supreme Court in Miranda v. Alabama (1966) that prior to the time of arrest and any interrogation of a person suspected of a crime, he/she must be told that he/she has: "the right to remain silent, the right to legal counsel, and the right to be told that anything he/she says can be used in court against" him/her. Further, if the accused person confesses to the authorities, the prosecution must prove to the judge that the defendant was informed of them and knowingly waived those rights, before the confession can be introduced in the defendant's criminal trial. The warnings are known as "Miranda Rights" or just "rights." The Miranda rule supposedly prevents self-incrimination in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the U. S. Constitution. Sometimes there is a question of admissibility of answers to questions made by the defendant before he/she was considered a prime suspect, raising a factual issue as to what is a prime suspect and when does a person become such a suspect?…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A California psychiatrist, Dr. Martin Blinder stated that the murder was committed under “dissociative reaction”. The plea was changed to not guilty due to temporary insanity. The jury believed Steinberg was sleepwalking, and therefore was not responsible for bludgeoning his wife Elana. He was exonerated of his murder charge (Sleepwalking: Definition from Answers.com, 2009). This defense is very convenient and convincing.…

    • 1592 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Esposito v. SFX

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    3. Briefly – state the facts of this case, using the information found in the case in LexisNexis. (5 points)…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 4 Assignment

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    John Doe is an individual that left his country in an effort to make a better life. However, he does not have legal status in America and was recently arrested for shoplifting merchandise, which was valued over $1,000. At the time of his arrest, John voluntarily began to make incriminating statements to the arresting officers. At the police station, detectives conducted an interview of John asking him about the theft. John Doe has had no prior arrests, is 35 years old, and most of John Doe’s family still resides in his home country. Due to the amount of money involved, the crime is deemed a felony and John was arrested and placed in the county jail in Toms River, NJ. He is going to face the judge in the Ocean County Superior Court; however, he has no money for bail.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Double Jeopardy

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Scheb, John M., & Scheb II, John M. (2011). Criminal Law & Procedure 7th, Ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays