Preview

Much ado and Carol Ann Duffy

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1215 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Much ado and Carol Ann Duffy
hijdsfExplore the ways Shakespeare and Carol Ann Duffy present human weaknesses/ flaws in some of the characters they write about
In Shakespeare’s play ‘Much Ado about Nothing’, Don John is a very important character. He is an illegitimate son, which automatically lowers him in the society of the Elizabethan age. He is isolated, ignored and rejected by everyone in his life, which is one of the reasons which seem to force him to behave as a villain. People expected this of him as they assumed that everyone born out of wedlock was probably an untrustworthy, malicious villain. Don John feels he must be a villain by acting in manipulative, sly and jealous ways, which portrays his lack of psychological development and lack of relationships with people. The relationship we mainly learn about in the play is between Don John and his brother, Don Pedro. Due to Don John being the illegitimate son it means he cannot inherit anything from his family nor have the same recognition as his brother, who is of legitimate birth. Even though Don Pedro doesn't outwardly treat Don John cruelly, Don John is very aware that he is seen as socially inferior to Don Pedro
He is a device used by Shakespeare to create tension and drama throughout the play. He is not the most complex villain among Shakespeare’s villainous characters, however he has a purpose. The thinness of his character teaches us about the knowledge people have of him in society: he is just seen as a ‘bastard’ and people don’t even want to be associated with him so don’t bother to learn anything about him. The fact that we don’t learn much about Don John also reminds us that the play isn’t meant to be a tragedy; it is supposed to teach us about the misunderstandings. It isn’t really supposed to analyse evil at all.
The question deals with Don John’s character of being weak and flawed. Flawed means having or characterized by a fundamental weakness of imperfection whereas weakness means a disadvantage or fault.
In

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    William Shakespeare is very intentional about character choices and their personalities. Each character plays an important role in setting the tragedy in motion. For this essay, I have chosen to analyze Tybalt, the Friar, and Benvolio’s personalities and explain how they contributed to the tragedies.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    <br>In Act 1, John's main conflict is dealing with his lust for Abigail. He does still lust for her even though they ended the affair, but though she persists, he does not submit. She catches him alone and tries to tempt him but he remains strong. This was very hard for him, because it is so tempting and easy to submit. But he is very against hypocrites, and at first finds it hard to criticize the morality of others, making him feel hypocritical.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Love, hate, fair and foul are tightly entwined around the core of drama. Although they are extreme opposite, they blur together to create the perfect partnership, which allows characters to appear different to their internal feelings. Whether it’s through the ‘barbed banter’ of ‘Much Ado About Nothing’ or the ‘saucy doubts and fears’ of Macbeth, Shakespeare presents scenarios where central characters place their credence where they should have agnosticism and their doubts where they should act with surety.…

    • 1911 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    He was a man amongst kids even though he began the play as the problem he showed character by trying to fix his problems. Cheating is always wrong, but the way John got his wife's forgiveness and died for his families name slightly helps his situation. This is his self-redeeming moment that every Aristotelian hero must face in his lifetime to be considered one. He fills the characterics needed to be an Aristotelian hero, but not only that to also be a role model for his family and friends. Even though he may have some flaws he overthrows that with positive actions that he continued to do until his death. Everyone has flaws and issues at some point in their lives, but what’s important is if they can battle through it and make a positive difference to another person’s…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Second, jealousy and anger are the characters motives for deception. The anger Don John has toward Claudio regarding the war is the second motive for his deception. Prior to learning who was getting married ,Don John states “Will it serve for any model to build mischief on?”.Upon learning that Claudio was in love with Hero, Don John becomes enraged and devises a plan to stop the marriage immediately. Summarizing himself as a “plain dealing villain”, Don John acknowledges that what he has devised is wrong, but is embracing his anger and behaves in the way that his “blood” causes him to. The moment he discovers that Claudio is happy and in love with he couldn’t stand the thought to let Claudio win again. Don John’s sole purpose for destroying…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In every play or book that a person reads the characters are never perfect. They always have a flaw that causes a problem or conflict within the storyline. This is true for Hamlet's character in William Shakespeare's Hamlet. In several of Hamlet's speeches he discloses many flaws in his character to the readers throughout the play. These are aspects that have thus far only been able to be seen as fragments in other speeches.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hamlet Character Analysis

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In Hamlet, many think of Hamlet as being the main or only tragically flawed character within the play. However, in actuality, the play contains many other characters that possess varying severities of imperfection, some of which put the shortcomings of Hamlet, the title character of Hamlet, to shame. Despite the tragically flawed nature of Hamlet’s character, other characters in the play are clearly more flawed in comparison to Hamlet. As a result of this character’s imperfection, many of the characters within the play Hamlet are considered tragic; however, those in which this trait is predominant are Claudius, Laertes and Gertrude.…

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Iago the Psychopath

    • 9984 Words
    • 29 Pages

    Source: Shakespearean Criticism. Ed. Dana Ramel Barnes. Vol. 35. Detroit: Gale Research, 1997. p252-263. From Literature Resource Center.…

    • 9984 Words
    • 29 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare's Macbeth is a classic example of the degradation of a character from valiant to villain. This degradation is chiefly achieved by the main character Macbeth himself as he is swayed by murderous intentions, but also by the provocative words of his inamorata, Lady Macbeth. The corruption exercised upon Macbeth as he travels his corrupted path is the ultimate and clearest theme of Macbeth: the self-generated damnation of one's soul.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All of these sources could have agreed with each other that Don, as a child was a “child prodigy” and as an adult, a mastermind. With all these praises written in by biographies through these authors, as a reader, we can insight of biasedness. After scanning through all of these sources, I find myself not finding any flaw Don has made within his life. Perhaps he was an excellent person during his lifetime. However, there could have been at least one thing that had made Don “not that great.” It does not have to be a crime he had committed, but it could have been some groups that had disagreed with his intellectual mind. Based on these sources, one might infer that everyone had loved and agreed with Don during his lifetime. This was a problem for me, as it did not give a limit to which Don was known in the Le dynasty. Instead, it made it seem like Don was always…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But it would better fit your honor to change your mind.” (3.2.102-109) Don John manipulates Claudio into being suspicious of Hero’s actions. Don John does not give any specifics on how Hero has been disloyal, all he says is that he will prove it to Claudio later that night, and then gives him the afternoon to visualize Hero’s wrongdoings. “I come hither to tell you; and circumstances shortened, for she has been too long a talking of, the lady is disloyal.” (3.2.95-97) When Don John told Claudio this he was hesitant to believe him but Don John told him,” If you will follow me, I will show you enough.” (3.2.113-14) Claudio believed Don John’s accusations and said that if it were true that he would shame her at the wedding, “If I see anything tonight why I should not marry her, tomorrow in the congregation, where I should wed, there will I shame her.” (3.3.116-18) Don John’s ultimate goal throughout the play was to steal the happiness from his brother and the friends of his brother, in any way he could. Don John plays a major role in almost all of the lies and deception in this play. He is the instigator for all the trouble between Claudio and Hero. His only intention is to ruin the love and happiness between Claudio and…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    What is it about Shakespeare’s characters and stories that make us all able to relate in some way or another 400 years after they are written? Maybe it’s his take on inner conflict, or is it how he never portrays a hero as perfect, or a villain as all evil? There is a certain universal truth about the human condition in every story. Whether it is the tragic outcome of unchecked greed and ambition, an unrelenting desire for revenge, or the pursuit of love, his representation of human nature is just as real and as relevant today, as it has been through the centuries. Most of Shakespeare’s characters are complex personalities led into tragedy by their shortcomings (Johnson). Even Shakespeare’s heroes are never just heroes; Shakespeare tends to build his stories through “false heroes” such as Othello, Anthony and Brutus, and “good villains” or “villains with a conscious” like Macbeth (Johnson). It is this type of inner conflict that makes Shakespeare’s stories so insightful and relatable.…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Works Cited Bloom, Harold. Shakespeare:The Invention of the Human. New York: Riverhead, 1998. Cahn,Victor L. The Plays of Shakespeare:A Thematic Guide.Westport: Greenwood, 2001. Fallon, Robert Thomas. A Theatergoer’s Guide to Shakespeare’s Themes. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2002. Downer, Alan S. “Feste’s Night.” College English. Feb. 1952: 13. JSTOR, Galileo, William & Evelyn Banks Lib., LaGrange, GA. 10 Apr. 2006. Goldsmith, Robert Hillis. “Touchstone: A Critic in Motley.” PMLA. Sept. 1953: 68. JSTOR, Galileo,William & Evelyn Banks Lib., LaGrange, GA. 10 Apr. 2006. Gray, Austin K. “Robert Armin:The Fool.” PMLA. Sept. 1927: 42. JSTOR, Galileo, William & Evelyn Banks Lib., LaGrange, GA. 10 Apr. 2006. Green, Lawrence D. “Where’s My Fool?: Some Consequences of the Omission of the Fool in Tate’s Lear.” Studies in English Literature. Spring 1972: 12. JSTOR, Galileo,William & Evelyn Banks Lib., LaGrange, GA. Aug. 2005. Kaiser,Walter Jacob. Praisers of Folly: Erasmus, Rabelais, Shakespeare. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1963. Klapp, Orrin E. “The Fool as a Social Type.” The American Journal of Sociology. Sept. 1949: 55. JSTOR, Galileo,William & Evelyn Banks Lib., LaGrange, GA. Aug. 2005. —-. “Heroes,Villains and Fools, as Agents of Social Control.” American Sociological Review. Feb. 1954: 19. JSTOR, Galileo,William & Evelyn Banks Lib., LaGrange, GA. 10 Apr. 2006. Martin,William F. The Indissoluble Knot: King Lear as Ironic Drama. Lanham: UP of America, 1987. Otto, Beatrice K. Fools Are Everywhere. Chicago: Chicago UP, 2000. Reibetanz, John. The Lear World.Toronto:Toronto UP, 1997. Shakespeare,William. AsYou Like It. Eds. Stanley Wells and Gary Taylor. NewYork:Oxford UP, 1988. —-. King Lear. Eds. Stanley Wells and Gary Taylor. NewYork: Oxford UP, 1988. —-. Twelfth Night. Eds. Stanley Wells and Gary Taylor. NewYork: Oxford UP, 1988.…

    • 7950 Words
    • 32 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Of all the main characters in Much Ado About Nothing, Don Pedro seems the most elusive. He is the noblest character in the social hierarchy of the play, and his friends Benedick and Claudio, though equals in wit, must always defer to him because their positions depend upon his favor. Don Pedro has power, and he is well aware of it; whether or not he abuses this power is open to question. Unlike his bastard brother, the villain Don John, Don Pedro most often uses his power and authority toward positive ends. But like his half-brother, Don Pedro manipulates other characters as much as he likes. For instance, he insists on wooing Hero for Claudio himself, while masked, rather than allowing Claudio to profess his love to Hero first. Of course, everything turns out for the best—Don Pedro’s motives are purely in the interest of his friend. But we are left wondering why Don Pedro feels the need for such an elaborate dissimulation merely to inform Hero of Claudio’s romantic interest. It seems simply that it is Don Pedro’s royal prerogative to do exactly as he wishes, and no one can question it. Despite his cloudy motives, Don Pedro does work to bring about happiness. It is his idea, for instance, to convince Beatrice and Benedick that each is in love with the other and by doing so bring the two competitors together. He orchestrates the whole plot and plays the role of director in this comedy of wit and manners.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Shakespeare’s plays were written in the Elizabethan and Jacobean periods, where the villains brought entertainment value to the plays by their plotting. A villain is someone who is an enemy and plays a prominent part in the play. Often in Shakespeare’s plays, the villains are normally malcontent. A Malcontent is a type of person/character which is prominent in Elizabethan dramas, which is rebellious and wants to cause other people distress. Some great examples of Shakespeare’s villains are Richard III and Tamora. Shakespeare uses Elizabethan types of Villain in his plays Othello and Much Ado about Nothing and J.A. Cudden described them ‘devilish’ and an ‘evil machinator or plotter’. Throughout Shakespeare’s plays Villains are in general antagonistic; they are against the good, innocent people in the play. This normally leads to a grave misfortune of others and often death. I am going to explore how Shakespeare portrays Villains through two well known villains called Iago from the tragedy Othello and Don John from the comedy Much Ado about Nothing. These villains are particularly excellent because they are not ‘Blood-thirsty’; they are devious and deceitful and operate with ‘sly treachery’. These Malcontents play on the emotions of other characters until they stop thinking in a rational way. Throughout both plays, Iago and Don John are Machiavellian as they effectively destroy the minds of people.…

    • 2074 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays