Global Innovation in MNCs: The Effects of Subsidiary
Self-Determination and TeamworkÃ
Ram Mudambi, Susan M. Mudambi, and Pietro Navarra
The ability of multinational corporations (MNCs) to leverage their innovation competencies across globally dispersed subsidiaries is an increasingly valuable source of competitive advantage. As multinational enterprises turn to foreign subsidiaries for research and development (R&D) and product development, questions arise regarding the most effective organizational structures for global innovation. Although organizational conditions that satisfy the needs for self-determination and teamwork have long been considered intrinsic motivators, past research has not analyzed the consequences of intrinsic motivators on global innovation. The basic research question is this: In globally dispersed subsidiary R&D units, what organizational conditions and motivators are associated with the highest knowledge output? A sample of 275 globally dispersed R&D subsidiaries were studied from 1995 to 2002. Data were collected from a postal survey, field and telephone interviews, and secondary sources.
Subsidiary self-determination and teamwork were found to have a significant effect on knowledge output, as objectively measured by patent citations. Subsidiary selfdetermination on inputs such as sourcing and hiring, and self-determination on outputs such as marketing and product development, emerged as positive determinants of knowledge generation in R&D subsidiaries. In addition, interteam cooperation and intrateam cooperation were significant determinants of knowledge generation by subsidiaries. These findings highlight the importance of self-determination, teamwork, and cooperation to knowledge creation and innovations. Managers face the tough challenge of how to motivate globally dispersed knowledge workers to conduct research that will generate
Citations: Kogut, B. and Singh, H. (1988). The Effect of National Culture on the Choice of Entry Mode Maslow, A.H. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review 50:370–96. McClelland, D.C. (1961). The Achieving Society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nortrand. McDonough III, E.F. (2000). Investigation of Factors Contributing to the Success of Cross-Functional Teams McDonough III, E.F., Kahn, K., and Barczak, G. (2001). An Investigation of the Use of Global, Virtual, and Colocated New Product Development Teams McFadyen, M.A. and Cannella Jr., A.A. (2004). Social Capital and Knowledge Creation: Diminishing Returns of the Number and McMillan, G.S., Hamilton III, R.D., and Deeds, D.L. (2000). Firm Management of Scientific Information: An Empirical Update. Giarratana, M. (2004). The Birth of a New Industry: Entry by StartUps and the Drivers of Firm Growth. Research Policy 33(5): 787–806. McMillan, G.S., Klavans, R.A., and Hamilton III, R.D. (1995). Firm Management of Scientific Information: Some Predictors and Implications of Openness versus Secrecy Gittelman, M. and Kogut, B. (2003). Does Good Science Lead to Valuable Knowledge? Biotechnology Firms and the Evolutionary Mendez, A. (2003). The Coordination of Globalized R&D Activities through Project Teams Organization: An Exploratory Empirical Mudambi, R. and Navarra, P. (2004). Is Knowledge Power? Knowledge Flows, Subsidiary Power and Rent-Seeking within MNCs. Nesta, L. and Saviotti, P.P. (2005). Coherence of the Knowledge Base and the Firm’s Innovative Performance: Evidence from the U.S. Shenkar, O. (2001). Cultural Distance Revisited: Towards a More Rigorous Conceptualization and Measurement of Cultural Differences Sherman, J.D. and Smith, H.L. (1984). The Influence of Organizational Structure on Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Motivation Nobel, R. and Birkinshaw, J. (1998). Innovation in Multinational Corporations: Control and Communication Patterns in International R&D Steiner, C.J. (1995). A Philosophy for Innovation: The Role of Unconventional Individuals in Innovation Success Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company. New York: Oxford University Press. Stern, S. (2004). Do Scientists Pay to Be Scientists? Management Science 50(6):835–53. Orlikowski, W.J. (2002). Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing Tampoe, M. (1993). Motivating Knowledge Workers. Long Range Planning 26(3):49–56. Osterloh, M. and Frey, B.S. (2000). Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms Tauer, J.M. and Harackiewicz, J.M. (2004). The Effects of Cooperation and Competition on Intrinsic Motivation and Performance. Pakes, A. (1985). On Patents, R&D, and the Stock Market Rate of Return Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management Persaud, A. (2005). Enhancing Synergistic Innovative Capability in Multinational Corporations: An Empirical Investigation Tomlin, L. (2001). The Effects of Model Specification on Foreign Direct Investment Models: An Application of Count Data Models. Reid, S.E. and de Brentani, U. (2004). The Fuzzy Front End of New Product Development for Discontinuous Innovations: A