On: 07 March 2015, At: 07:17
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House,
37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
International Journal of Production Research
Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tprs20 Multiple decoupling point paradigms in a global supply chain syndrome: a relational analysis a a
Arnab Banerjee , Bijon Sarkar & S.K. Mukhopadhyay a b
Department of Production Engineering , Jadavpur University , Kolkata, 700032 , India
b
Visiting Professor, Jadavpur University, West Bengal University of Technology, CA-30,
Sector -1 , Salt Lake, Kolkata, 700064 , India
Published online: 27 Oct 2011.
To cite this article: Arnab Banerjee , Bijon Sarkar & S.K. Mukhopadhyay (2012) Multiple decoupling point paradigms in a global supply chain syndrome: a relational analysis, International Journal of Production Research, 50:11, 3051-3065, DOI:
10.1080/00207543.2011.588624
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.588624
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the
Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities
References: Akkerman, R., Meer, van der, D., and Donk, van, P.D., 2010. Make to stock and mix to order: choosing intermediate products in the food processing industry Banerjee, A. and Yadav, G., 2010. Empirical framework to determine decoupling points in an ATO scenario. Proceedings of 31st Annual Conference of the American Society of Engineering Management. Banerjee, A., Mukhopadhyay, S.K., and Sarkar, B., 2010. An intrinsic decoupling in managing supply chain syndrome. Banomyong, R., Veerakachen, V., and Supatn, N., 2008. Implementing leagility in reverse logistics channels. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 11 (1), 31–47. Bhatnagar, R., Chandra, P., and Goyal, S.K., 1993. Models for multi-plant coordination. European Journal of Operational Research, 67 (2), 141–160. Christopher, M., 1992. Logistics and Supply Chain Management. 1st ed. London: Pitman. Chung, W. and Ng, W.T., 2008. A study of how distributors provide postponement services in the supply chain. International Review of Business Research Papers, 4 (4), 92–101. Donk, van, P.D., 2001. Make to stock or make to order: the decoupling point in the food processing industries. International journal of Production Economics, 69 (3), 297–306. Garcia-Dastugue, J.S. and Lambert, M.D., 2007. Interorganizational time-based postponement in the supply chain. Journal of Business Logistics, 28 (1), 57–80. Giesberts, P.M.J. and van der Tang, L., 1992. Dynamics of the customer order decoupling point: impact on information systems for production control Krishnamurthy, R. and Yauch, C.A., 2007. Leagile manufacturing: a proposed corporate infrastructure. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27 (6), 588–604. Kruskal, K.B., 1964. Non-metric multidimensional scaling: a numeric method. Psychometrika, 29 (2), 115–129. Mason-Jones, R. and Towill, D.R., 1999. Using the information decoupling point to improve the supply chain performance. Mason-Jones, R., Naylor, B., and Towill, D.R., 2000a. Lean, agile or leagile? Matching your supply chain to the market place. International Journal of Production Research, 38 (17), 4061–4070. Mason-Jones, R., Naylor, B., and Towill, D.R., 2000b. Engineering the leagile supply chain. International Journal of Agile Management Systems, 2 (1), 54–61. Mitaim, S. and Kosko, B., 2001. The shape of fuzzy sets in adaptive function approximation. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 9 (4), 637–656. Mukhopadhyay, S.K., Sarkar, P., and Panda, R.P., 1994. Machine-component grouping in cellular manufacturing by multidimensional scaling Naim, M.M. and Gosling, J., 2011. On leanness, agility, and leagile supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 131 (1), 342–354. Naylor, B.J., Naim, M.M., and Berry, D., 1999. Leagility: integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain Olhager, J., 2003. Strategic positioning of the order penetration point. International Journal of Production Economics, 85 (3), 319–329. Olhager, J., Selldin, E., and Wikner, J., 2006. Decoupling the value chain. International Journal of Value Chain Management, 1 (1), 19–32. Pham, D.T. and Thomas, A., 2005. Fighting fit factories: making industry lean, agile and sustainable. IEE Manufacturing Engineer, 84 (2), 24–29. Piegat, A., 2005. A new definition of fuzzy set. International Journal of Applied Mathematical Computer Science, 15 (1), 125–140. Pontrandolfo, P. and Okogbaa, O.G., 1999. Global manufacturing: a review and a framework for planning in a global corporation Rahimnia, F. and Mahdi, M., 2010. Supply chain leagility in professional services: how to apply the decoupling point concept in a healthcare delivery system Sharman, G., 1984. The rediscovery of logistics. Harvard Business Review, 62 (5), 71–79. Shepard, R.N., 1962a. The analysis of proximities: multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function I. Shepard, R.N., 1962b. The analysis of proximities: multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function II. Smithson, M. and Verkuilen, J., 2006. Fuzzy set theory: applications in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Sun, X.Y., et al., 2008. Positioning multiple decoupling points in a supply network. International Journal of Production Economics, 113 (2), 943–956. Swaminathan, J.M. and Tayur, S.R., 1998. Managing broader product lines through delayed differentiation using vanilla boxes. Verdouw, C.N., Beulens, A.J.M., and Trienekens, J.H., 2006. Modelling demand-driven chain networks using multiple CODPs. Vlist, P.V., Hoppenbrouwers, M.E.J.J., and Hegge, H.M.H., 1997. Extending the enterprise through multi-level supply control. Vorst, vander, J.G. and Dijk, van, Stephan, Beulens, A., 2001. Leagile supply chain design in the food industry: using decoupling points in an inflexible poultry supply chain with high demand uncertainty Wang, F., Lin, J., and Liu, X.H., 2010. Three-dimensional model of customer order decoupling point position in mass customization Wikner, J. and Rudberg, M., 2005. Introducing a customer order decoupling zone in logistics decision making. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 8 (3), 211–224. Xuejun, X., Qi, F., and Zhiyong, G., 2007. Research on lean, agile and leagile supply chains. International Conference in Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 7 (1), 4902–4907. Yanez, C.F., et al., 2009. Agent-based simulation and analysis of demand-driven production strategies in the timber industry. International Journal of Production Research, 47 (22), 6295–6319. Zimmermann, H.J., 1996. Fuzzy set theory and its application. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.