Knowledge Workers and Managers
Frank Bannister and Dan Remenyi
Trinity College, Dublin
Frank.Bannister@tcd.ie
Dan.Remenyi@tcd.ie
Abstract: While the productivity paradox has now been officially pronounced dead, the argument and the evidence for this assertion are both at a macroeconomic level. What has been less closely examined is the microeconomic impact of recent developments in ICT on the productivity of office and knowledge workers. There is an assumption, readily seen in many advertisements for mobile technology, that multi-tasking, WiFi connected laptops, Blackberrys, smart phones and so on are good for business and make people more effective and productive. This may be true some of the time and there is some (albeit limited) research which supports claims that these technologies increase productivity. However there are also emerging concerns that, in certain environments, these technologies may actually reduce productivity in both the short and the long term. This paper examines this problem and research to date and proposes a framework for further investigation of this phenomenon.
Keywords: multitasking, multicommunication, productivity, effectiveness, efficiency, ICT evaluation.
1. Introduction: Implicit assumptions
1.1 A multitasking world
In October 2007 a video entitled “A Vision of Today’s Students” was posted on Youtube1. The video includes a series of views of students in a contemporary lecture theatre. As the camera turns to each student in turn, he or she holds up a card or a laptop showing a personal message such as “I spend three and a half hours a day on-line” or “I will read 8 books this year”. One such card simply says “I am a Multi-tasker”.
In another video in the same vein, a black and white photograph of an old fashioned classroom from early in the last century is shown. The accompanying text argues that the type of learning depicted was designed for people who
References: Applebaum, S. and A. Marchionni (2008) The Multi-tasking paradox: perceptions, problems and strategies, Management Decision, 40(9), 1313-1325. Aral, S., E. Brynjolfsson and M. Van Alstyne (2006) Information, Technology and Information Worker Productivity: Task Level Evidence, MIT Working Paper Basex Inc. (2005) The Cost of Not Paying Attention: How Interruptions Impact Knowledge Worker Productivity. Available from: Craik, F.I. and E. Bialystock (2006) Planning and Task Management in Older Adults: Cooking Breakfast, Memory and Cognition, 34(4), 1236-1249. Daft, R. L. and R. H. Lengel (1986) Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design, Management Science, 32(5), 554–571. Dzubak, C. M. (2008) Multitasking: The good, the bad, and the unknown, Synergy, 1(2). Retrieved 5th July 2008 from: http://atp.jsu.edu/Synergy_1/Syn_6.pdf Fischer, S.C., K.A. Morrin and S. Joslyn (2003) Measuring Multi-tasking Ability, Anacapa Sciences, Inc, Santa Barbara, CA. Fried, C.B. (2008) In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning, Computers & Education, 50(3), 906-914. Galicia, L, V. Gonzáles and J. Favela (2007) Personal Activity Management: Towards a technological approach to support proactive planning of multiple activities, International Journal of Computers, Systems and Signals, 8(2), 60- Gezell, I. (2007) Time Travel: The Myth Behind the Allure of Multitasking, The Journal for Quality and Participation, 30(4), 22. Giddens, A. (1986) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Polity Press, UK. González, V. and G. Mark (2004) “Constant, Constant, Multitasking Craziness”: Managing Multiple Work Spheres, Proceeding of CHI, 24-29 April 2004, Vienna, 6(1), 113-120 Kirn, W. (2007) The Autumn of the Multitaskers, Atlantic Monthly, November, 66-80. Lohr, S. (2007) Slow Down, Brave Multitasker, and Don’t Read This in Traffic, The New York Times, March 25th, 2007, Accessed 14th July 2007 at: Malhotra, Y. (2005) Integrating knowledge management technologies in organizational business processes: getting real time enterprises to deliver real business performance, Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(1), 7-28. Mangelsdorf, M.E. (2008) What Makes Information Workers Productive, MIT Sloan Review, 40(2), 16-17. Mark, G., V. Gonzáles and J. Harris (2005) No Task Left Behind: examining the nature of fragmented work, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,, Portland Oregon, 321-330. Mintzberg H (1973) The Nature of Managerial Work, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Mintzberg H. (1970) Structured observation as a method to study managerial work, The Journal of Management Studies, 7, 87-104. Reder, S. and R.G. Schwab (1990) The temporal structure of cooperative activity, in Proceedings of the 1990 ACM conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Los Angeles, October 1990, 303-316 Reinsch, N.L, J W. Turner and C.H. Tinsley (2008) Multicommunicating: A practice whose time has come?, Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 391-403. Roper, K.A. and P. Juneja (2008) Distractions in the Workplace Revisited, Journal of Facilities Management, 6(2), 91- 109. Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (2008) Driver Distraction. Retrieved 10th July from: www.rospa.com/roadsafety/advice/driving/info/driver_distraction.pdf Rubenstein, J., D.E. Myers and J.E. Evans (2001) Executive Control of Cognitive Processes in Task Switching, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(4), 763-797. Spink, A., H. C. Ozmutlu and S. Ozmutlu (2002) Multitasking Information Seeking and Searching Processes, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(8), 639 – 652. SU, N. M. and G. Mark (2008) Communication Chains and Multitasking, Proceeding of CHI 2008, 5th-12th April 2008, Florence, 83-92 University of California - Los Angeles (2006, July 26). Multi-tasking Adversely Affects Brain 's Learning, UCLA Psychologists Report. Wasson, C. (2007) Multitasking During Virtual Meetings, HR Human Resources Planning, 27(4), 47-60.