Preview

My Jot Notes

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
616 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
My Jot Notes
My Jot Notes How can I speak about the GOOD universally? OBJECTIVE or ESSENTIALISM: There is a truth, or a good (which we can try to find and discover). In ESSENTIALISM the truth (or good) exists a priori or before we think about or discern it. The truth does not depend on us. SUBJECTIVE or EXISTENTIALISM: All truth and goodness is relative (i.e. “it all depends”) In EXISTENTIALISM the truth (or good) is a posteriori or only after we think about it or discern it. In existentialism, the individual defines everything. (We’ll look at this again when we examine some worldviews…) Are you an objective or subjective thinker? Aristotle: 384-322 BCE Aristotle’s unifying belief in his philosophy is that everything has a goal or end (Greek: telos) Hence the name teleological ethics. So for Aristotle, the “good” was the end or goal of a particular object. For humans, Aristotle claimed this end: All people seek to be happy. Do you agree with Aristotle? Does humanity need a goal? If so, what is it? Aristotle’s Argument • Every thing has a final cause, the good at which it aims, and Aristotle argued that since there cannot be an infinite regress of merely extrinsic goods, there must be a highest good at which all activity ultimately aims. This end or goal of life for humans could be called happiness (or living well), of course, but what is it really? Answer this question for yourself! According to Aristotle, things of any variety have a characteristic function that they are properly used to perform. The good for human beings, then, must essentially involve the entire proper function of human life as a whole, and this must be an activity of the soul that expresses genuine virtue or excellence.





Do we need “virtue or excellence” to achieve happiness? GOOD AND EVIL: A Starting Point from Aristotle GOODNESS = EXISTENCE Good and existence are the same thing; good is not something added to existence, goodness is existence. Everything that is, is good simply because it is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    microsoft notes

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A user would like to secure files stored on a floppy disk. Which file system should they select to format the disk?…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    PHI2000 The Good Life

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Aristotle believes that one’s accomplishments in being happy are the driving force to a “Good Life”. The good life creates a happiness that relates to one functioning well and reason. Aristotle believes that it takes time, hard work and restraint to get to the employ the habits of reasoning and according to him everything has a purpose (Rachels and Rachels, pg 54). Aristotle states that “Good” has rightly been defined as “that at which all things aim” and that people identify happiness with living well or doing well (Sommers & Sommers, 2010).…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle’s argument in virtue ethics is based on an appeal to the notion of an objective account of “the good” for human beings and happiness. “The good” is so important that every good soul takes it as the end. On the other hand, it is also so hard to grasp what are “the good”, so that people seem to be able to intuitively feel it exists but cannot establish a solid belief in it. If one does not know what are “good”, then naturally they will not be able to identify other things that have goodness.…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because Aristotle is basing his argument on virtue ethics, he is not trying to derive a rule but, deriving a good person. An overall good human should possess character-traits to be a morally good person. To start his argument, it must be mentioned that he begins by stating that, "Every art and every inquiry, and similarly every action and pursuit, is thought to aim at some good: and for this reason the good has rightly been declared to be that at which all things aim...if, then, there is some end of the things we do, which we desire for its own sake (everything else being desired for the sake of this), and if we do not choose everything for the sake of something else (for at that rate the process would go on to infinity, so that our desire would be empty and vain), clearly this must be the good and the chief good." (Aristotle, pg. 124) In Book X, Aristotle reiterates that the final end of all activity is this chief good and this chief good is happiness.…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the quest to find out what is the ultimate human good, Aristotle dedicated Book 1 of the Nicomachean Ethics to provide an account of what is the ultimate human good, and what it consists of. This essay will examine why Aristotle thinks that eudaimonia (happiness), is the ultimate human good. Through this discussion, we will see Aristotle suggest four central views which are critical to eudaimonia being the ultimate human good. Firstly, one has to live a life according to one’s function. Secondly, natural, virtuous activity is required in order to live a life of happiness. Thirdly, one requires possessing external goods such as wealth, power and friends in order to be happy. Last but not least, in order to live a life of happiness, one has to live a whole life in accordance to virtue in order to determine if the person lived a happy life.…

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Happiness is the highest good because it has a sufficient end in itself. Intelligence and virtue are good because they make us happy.…

    • 2394 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Social Responsibility

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In Aristotle’s theory of morality, Nicomachean Ethics, he surmises that all human activities aim at some end or good. There are three types of good, sensual (pleasure), political (noble virtues for citizens), of life of thought (contemplation) (Arthur & Scalet, 2009, p. 51). He states “every scientific inquiry, and similarly every action and purpose may be said to aim at some good”. What he is saying is that everything has an end point which is something good. Everything we want to accomplish is for some good. The ends are many, and he goes on to say the end of the medical art I health, the end of the shipbuilding is a vessel, the end of strategy is victory, and the end of economics is wealth. One piece, to point out is Aristotle states there is a final end. For example some may think of money as an end, however, without something to purchase, money is meaningless. Working for example is an action not a goal, work is not the good, so what is the supreme end, what are you working to attain? “Perhaps happiness is the supreme good” (Arthur & Scalet, 2009, p. 52).…

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many people try to define and consider different definitions of what happiness is, and I think that Plato and Aristotle offer interesting views of happiness and what it means for one to live a good life. Both philosophers agree that happiness is an important factor in one’s life and essentially the essence of how to live a good life. Plato offers many theories and definitions of justice leading to happiness, while Aristotle argues that happiness is the main goal that all humans aim for in their entire life. Plato offers a philosophical view of a happy life for an individual by explaining a just state and what it would entail and also the theory of the forms that one must understand to achieve happiness. After learning about both philosophers, I have come to the conclusion that I agree with Aristotle’s view of happiness more because he gives us a broad outline of what a good life is. Although Plato was Aristotle’s mentor, Aristotle offers a view of happiness that is more plausible and relevant than Plato’s because it places a large emphasis on the idea of the function of a human being. Therefore, in this paper, I will argue that I agree with Aristotle’s view of happiness over Plato’s because of the way Aristotle describes how humans can achieve the greatest good in life: happiness.…

    • 1782 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle – Virtue EthicsMill – UtilitarianismKant – DeontologyConsequentialismNodding – Care Ethicswhat would you say is our principal or highest objective by nature?…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Aim of Man

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Aristotle starts off in his essay explaining the definitions of Good, Primacy of Statecraft and the study of Ethics. He defines good as where all things are to be aimed, for example health. He then defines Statecraft as citizens of a state, a country, and of the world need to do good for their own good but more importantly for the good of the state. He also characterizes various types of good. Finally, the definition on study of Ethics. This talks about the pure excellence of justice that involves the disagreements and agreements of uncertainty and certainty. Aristotle also talks about happiness and where a certain point can be overlooked and how arguments can be led from first principles. First principles came about in a variety of ways: by induction, direct perception, and habituation. The question then leads to where the sources of happiness come from but a result of virtue of learning or some kind of training. Because the virtue of learning and the some kind of training is rewarded by a blessing that is generally shared but with the exception of the virtue being stunted. Aristotle concludes his essay by examining the most human element, the soul, and its relationship to virtue. Aristotle’s definition of happiness is, “Happiness is a certain activity of the soul in accordance with perfect virtue”.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Aristotle’s Book II of Nicomachean Ethics, he explains that virtue of character is the mean to the ultimate end, which is happiness. Aristotle states that, without a goal or ultimate end (happiness), life does not have a purpose. Therefore every action in a person’s life has to be made with true virtue of character in mind in order to achieve…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis P. Pojman's Analysis

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Aristotle was Plato’s prize pupil who discussed the types of moments where moral correctness may be applied to certain events, nature of virtues involved in the sound morality of humans as well as the ways to achieve happiness in one’s life. The overall question that Aristotle tends to ask himself and try to answer is the question that pertains to human character and personality, what do we as humans need to do, to be considered as a good person. Aristotle explained that every activity has a final cause and purpose at which it aims to achieve and he argued that since there is not an infinite amount of goods, there has to be one type of good that is the highest and most important which humans strive towards. He continues to describe this ultimate good and decided that it could be called happiness, however the only puzzling question left is, what is happiness? Due to its existence in so many forms it is tough to describe happiness as one true thing…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many answers from many different sources for what “the good” actually is. I will be discussing a few theories that I feel have some key concepts which point to what the good ultimately is: egoism, utilitarianism, and deontology. Egoism values the desires of the individual the most, and this is most important to the individual. Utilitarianism, on the other hand, needs to be impartial in order to value each individual’s happiness equally. Deontology also conflicts with both of these other theories because it is not consequentialist like utilitarianism, and does not always benefit the individual or anyone else involved. The best solution for the conflicts between these three theories is to break them down and build a theory that can…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aristotle and Virtue

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Aristotle believes that we need virtue, both of thought and of character, to achieve that completeness leading to happiness. This is the function: activity in the soul in accord with virtue, where soul is defined as what is in us that carries out our characteristic activity. Aristotle is right in believing we need virtue.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Virtue is the key to a meaningful and happy life. According to ancient philosophers, Socrates and Aristotle, developing virtue is vital in order to lead a successful, fulfilling life. Though both men differ in their interpretations of a "good life," they both agree that the supreme life is one of virtuous meaning. Each of the philosophers have devised and implemented their own definitions and guidelines to acquire and practice a virtuous disposition. While it is agreed that knowledge and practice are the key to virtuosity, the philosophers disagree on fundamental rules to follow. The inherent question to be explored concerns the idea of virtue; what is it and how does one acquire it? The answer is anything but simple, but a blend of both philosophies can shed light on the two men 's view on practicing a virtuous life. Socrates and Aristotle believe in distinct ends to a common mean.…

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays