The Vietnam controversy made many people feel at distress. It was never considered a "war," although that is exactly what it was. The My Lai Massacre in Vietnam was one of the many atrocities of that war. There is an unquestionable connection between Milgram 's "Obedience to Authority" and the My Lai Massacre.
According to Kelman & Hamilton, "Unquestioning obedience has been the cause of such disasters as the My Lai massacre and the Holocaust. People need to resist the dangerous web of influence from strong personalities in fields such as politics, religion and the mass media who become the objects of their idolatry. To become less susceptible to the irrational persuasive power of such personalities, individuals should develop a sense of self-respect and practice critical thinking" (Kelman & Hamilton). In cases such as the My Lai Massacre, the soldiers were not just following the thoughts of a politician or religious figure. They followed their military leader, the same person they counted on for leadership and survival.
"Soldiers are trained to always follow orders, never question orders (When I say jump, u you say how high). But that belief is somewhat erroneous, the charge to the soldier is to obey any lawful order given (Schwalbe). "Absolute obedience, although not wholeheartedly embraced in official military pronouncements, is nevertheless unanimously praised in combat context (Peppers). Some military scholars call the modern version of military discipline "enlightened obedience." Enlightened obedience
springs from a belief on the part of the subordinate that his superior 's orders are authoritative and valid (Peppers)."
A classic example of the power of authoritative factors is provided by Stanley Milgram 's study on obedience to authority. College students from Yale University were asked to participate in an experiment to test the effects of punishment on learning. They were willing to continue administering what they thought were increasingly higher levels of shocks to another subject (actually an actor) simply because the experimenter (Milgram) said to do so. The results, in fact, were so unbelieveable that they made Milgram one of the most famous social psychologist. About 65 percent of the subjects continued to obey the experimenter to the end of the experiment even when they thought the victim was getting dangerous levels of electric shock, and even when he asked them to stop
So what exactly does the My Lai Massacre have to do with Milgram 's experiment? The My Lai Massacre of 1968, in which a company of American soldiers poured automatic rifle fire into groups of unarmed villagers, killing perhaps 500 people, many of them women and children" (Hammer). Those soldiers were obeying orders from a superior officer.
"It passed without notice when it occurred in mid-March 1968. Yet the brief blood bath at My Lai, a hamlet in Viet Cong-infested territory 335 miles northeast of Saigon, may yet have an impact on the war. According to accounts that suddenly appeared on TV and in the world press last week, a company of 60 or 70 U.S. infantrymen had
entered My Lai early one morning and destroyed houses, livestock and all the inhabitants that they could find in a brutal operation that took less than 20 minutes. When it was over, the Vietnamese dead totaled at least 100 men, women and children, and perhaps many more, only 25 or so escaped, because they lay hidden under the fallen bodies of others. (Schawlbe) Military men said that stories of what happened at My Lai are correct. If so, the incident ranks as the most serious atrocity yet attributed to American troops" (Hammer).
Isard said, "I see men who obeyed the leaders of their country, then lost themselves". The My Lai Massacre was planned. "Planned, how could it have been planned? A recon patrol, perhaps, was planned, maybe even a search and destroy mission: Burn the villages; interrogate the villagers, and all that. But a massacre? Strategies are planned. Brutalities just happen" (Isard).
"Obedience to Authority" Stanley Milgram described the "agentic shift in which an individual attributes responsibility for his or her actions to a person in the position of authority." In the My Lai Massacre the men felt it was their duty to open fire on the village. They were given orders to do just that. There was no questioning of orders from Cally, their superiour. The soldiers must have done as they were told, or incur sever consequences. Soldiers are taught from their first moments in Boot Camp that orders must be obeyed.
The way in which the My Lai Massacre was particularly a case of over obedience to the military, is that the men that committed the massacre were ordered to do so.
They did not decide on their own to destroy a bunch of people. They were following orders from military authoritative figures to destroy My Lai. What does this mean? Its clearly a case of over obedience to military authority. The men had two choices. They could obey a command and kill hundreds of innocent people, or they could disobey a command and face a possible consequences from the courts. In actuality they didn 't have a choice. many of the soldiers in Vietnam were there because of the draft, they however in their eyes, served their country to their best of their knowledge. They went bravely into battle and they did what had to be done. In the case of the My Lai Massacre, they were following orders just as they had done in many other times in the war. Only this time, the orders were to kill hundreds of villagers, not the Viet Cong, not the enemy. There were women and children in that village. They were gunned down mercilessly. For what reason? They were ordered to do so.
The soldiers had an obligation, a duty to obey their superiors. That is what makes the military so successful. Soldiers not ask questions; they merely obey orders. In this
instance the orders went too far. Hundreds of innocent people were killed in the name of following orders. Is this any less an atrocious because the men were ordered to fire on the village of My Lai? No. Were the men doing this for personal gain? No. Were they doing it out of hatred or in defense? No. Many of the people in the village were women and children. The soldiers had nothing against those people In this instance the village of My Lai was a case of death by over obedience of the American army. Was what they did right or wrong? In the eyes of most people, including the participants, the action was wrong, but they could not be faulted because they were simply following orders.
Works Cited
Hammer, Richard One Morning in the War: The tragedy at Son My. Coward-McCann NY 1970
Isard, Walter., ed. Vietnam: Issues and Alternatives. Schenkman . Cambridge MA: 1969
Kelman, Herbert C.; Hamilton, Lee V. Crimes of Obedience. New Haven: Yale University Press. 1989
Milgram, Stanley. "The Perils of Obedience." Writing and Reading Across the
Curriculum. 7th ed. By Laurence Behrens and Leonard J. Rosen. New York: Longman, 2000. 343-355
Miller, Heather. "Stanley Milgram"
http://muskingum.edu/~psychology/psycweb/history/milgram.htm
Peppers, Donald A. "War Crimes and Induction: A Case for Selective Nonconscientious
Objection." Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 3, No. 2. (Winter, 1974),
pp.129-166. JSTOR Middlesex County College Library, Edison. 29 Nov. 2000 http://www.jstor.org
Schwalbe, David. "The My Lai Massacre." American History. 1998 http://americanhistory.about.com/homework/americanhistory/library/weekly/aa031798.htm
Cited: Kelman, Herbert C.; Hamilton, Lee V. Crimes of Obedience. New Haven: Yale University Press. 1989 Milgram, Stanley Curriculum. 7th ed. By Laurence Behrens and Leonard J. Rosen. New York: Longman, 2000. 343-355 Miller, Heather Objection." Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 3, No. 2. (Winter, 1974), pp.129-166 Schwalbe, David. "The My Lai Massacre." American History. 1998 http://americanhistory.about.com/homework/americanhistory/library/weekly/aa031798.htm
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
On March 16, 1968 the massacre of My Lai took place when 75 troops marched into the village of My Lai and killed over 500 civilians. This unfortunate blemish on America is still being debated today, unsure of where to place the blame. Do they place it with Lt. William Calley for giving the command to his troops, or to Lt. Calley’s commanding officers who from which Calley was just acting out orders, or to the American people for there continued protest of the war.…
- 307 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Unfortunate event occurred at Pink Vile when the Charlie Company was there. The Geneva Convention was clearly violated when captain Medina and Lt. Calley were giving orders to shoot innocent civilians. There was a year cover up of the My Lai Massacre in the time military forces were looking for excuses to justify their actions. Why was Lt. Calley the only one held accountable and was his punishment fair? Who should have been held accountable for the events that have happened at My Lai?…
- 424 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
After the public discovered what happened in My Lai, the people no longer knew what to think of the military efforts, they just knew they were sick of the war and constant bloodshed. When news of the massacre came out “Demands for withdrawal from Vietnam continued to grow, while others questioned the idea of blind loyalty to military leadership” (Experience). The people were already not happy with the war, but knowing that hundreds of innocents had been slaughtered completely destroyed their trust; more people began asking for a withdrawal from Vietnam and questioning the ideal of blindly following orders. These pictures didn’t just impact the Americans at home however, after the implementation of “Vietnamisation” many of the ground troops began to lose morale. The morale was so low among the ground troops that “many of them were annoyed, frustrated and addicted to drugs as a result”(Rohn). The My Lai massacre served as a huge turning point in the public opinion of the war; people no longer supported the war and soldiers could not handle such low morale, to the point where many soldiers turned to drugs. A mix of all these things coming together brought forth the idea of Vietnamisation, a system to equip and expand South Vietnamese soldiers and pull out American…
- 580 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The My Lai Massacre occurred on March 16, 1968 IN the village called My Lai, which is located in South Vietnam. The Vietnam war was fought between The North and The South Vietnam about Communism. This was feared by many about the world, especially in America. Anti-communist countries backed out South Vietnam the best of their availability. The communist countries, however, supported North Vietnam at their best availability. America was fighting for eleven years, while the Vietnam was lasting much longer than that.…
- 815 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
On March 16, 1968, members of Company C, also known as Charlie Company, of the 1st Battalion, 20th Infantry Regiment, 11th Brigade of the 23rd (Americal) Infantry Division working under the command of Captain Medina and Lieutenant Calley entered the South Vietnamese village of My Lai and systematically murdered between 347 and 504 innocent non-combatant civilians. A series of investigations in the year following the incident led to the arrest of one officer who was released after only serving three and one half years under house arrest. How did it happen that a massacre of such a great scale ended with little to no repercussions for those involved? Who was really to blame for the massacre: the men on the ground or the higher ups? I believe…
- 1409 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
During the course of the Vietnam War, many infamous events occurred, including the disastrous My Lai Massacre. On the morning of March 16, 1968 the Charlie Company, led by Lieutenant William Calley, marched into the small village of My Lai in Vietnam prepared to fight the enemy; the whole operation took less than an hour to complete. In the end, more than five hundred people-mostly women, young children and infants, and the elderly-were killed (Trueman “My Lai Massacre”). A frantic cover-up by the American army followed in an attempt to hide it from the public eye. One year later, it was publicized and reluctantly investigated by the government; however, the soldiers involved were not entirely open to discussion about the massacre and did not…
- 1970 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Resulting from the American fear of spreading communism in South East Asia, the Vietnam War was America's longest and most exhausting conflict. President Lyndon B. Johnson inherited this problem of spreading communism in 1964, and was at first somewhat against the prospect of conflict having known it may hurt his reelection chances. However, as conditions worsened in South Vietnam Johnson began to slowly launch the massive war effort beginning with an unrelenting bombing campaign on the Viet Cong.…
- 806 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
To what degree should people follow orders of superiors due to their authority? A Few Good Men is a movie where the moral difference between right and wrong is very unclear in the name of following authority. Professors of sociology, Kelman and Hamilton worked together on “The My Lai Massacre: A Military Crime of Obedience” where they tried to apply reason to the soldiers who committed a massacre of unarmed women and children during the Vietnam War. Theodore Dalrymple is a physician who wrote “Just Do What the Pilot Tells You” by analyzing Milgram’s electric shock torture experiment to shine light on when is right to obey to authority, while he emphasizes not to follow authority blindly. These pieces can be used to understand how Marines were able to kill a fellow Marine in Rob Reiner’s A Few Good Men.…
- 887 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Several minutes later Lieutenant Calley returns and says “How come they aren’t dead?” The soldiers then turn to kill them although some seemed apparently uncomfortable and unwilling to do so. The situation in which the soldiers are left alone with prisoners display a similar behavior as witnessed with Why My Lai 1st semester project 46 the subject in the above mentioned experiment. After leaving the soldiers alone with the orders to “take care of them” they show subtle sympathy towards the gathered prisoners in “sparing” their lives rather than shooting them right away. This of course can be interpreted in the individual soldiers’ sense of moral ethics towards his fellow man, but under the circumstances of this specific, somewhat chaotic and brutal event one could just as much assume they are meant to kill the prisoners instead of simply guarding them. Comparing this situation with the experiment we encounter a slight problem when taking the concept of consequence into consideration. For the participant in the experiment there was no immediate consequence in not being obedient to the experimenter and raising the shock level when required. However, for the soldiers in the mentioned situation, they faced an authority figure which during the massacre was known to be life threatening towards the soldiers if they did not do what was ordered. The results of the experiment and the mentioned example differ as we look closer at a situational perspective; nonetheless we see similarities of the two when looking at the result of the given order in the absence of authority. The soldiers involved in My Lai were all part of an institution larger and more powerful than any of those used in the Milgram…
- 1558 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Soldiers will do almost anything that their commander tells them. In a good way this is useful but when what they are doing is morally wrong there should be boundaries. But there are none and if they don't do what they are told then they have to face the punishment. But this is still different because they are trained to do whatever it takes to protect their nation no matter. However when a commander becomes corrupt they take advantage of the troops and use them for their own wrong doing. So there is a limit of when people should follow authority. Most people can tell when someone is corrupt but there are still those who think just because he is your commander it must be right so I have to do…
- 819 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
There are many reasons why a soldier, (doesn't matter the rank) should obey orders from anyone above him or her in the chain of command. Sometimes its good to listen to people soldiers below you too because they maybe smarter at the task then you are. One reason is that the military is revolved around higher ranking soldiers leading the lower ranking soldiers, they’re more experienced in the military then I am and been deployed more than i have. If everyone in the military just did their own thing then we wouldn't be a successful army and then our country wouldn't be as strong as it is. Every higher up gives an order for a reason, we may not like the reason but in the end most of the orders and decisions will be smart ones i guarantee. We were taught as children to obey our higher-ups. Starting from our parents, teachers, managers, police officers and etc… So how does this relate to the military? Well, when a person enlists in the United States Military, active duty or reserve, they take the following oath, “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice.” Right there you are making a promise to the United States Military. Before you or I even put on the uniform, you promise you’ll obey the orders of the President and the orders of the officers appointed over you. Military discipline and effectiveness is built on the foundation of obedience to orders. Brand new privates are taught to obey, immediately and without question, orders from their superiors, right from day one of boot camp. Almost every soldier can tell you that obedience was drilled into their…
- 1025 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The Vietnam War differed from many wars due to the controversy of nearly every aspect of the war. During the Vietnam War, it was not only soldiers who were killed during all of the fighting. Yes others besides soldiers were killed in every war fought, but the war in Vietnam War was just greatly more so than nearly every other war. During the war, there were approximately four million civilians and innocent bystanders that were killed (Estimated n. pag.) The American population had minimal knowledge of what was actually happening in Vietnam during the war, so they ended up blaming the soldiers for all of the deaths and wrongdoings. After a short amount of time during the war, the majority of America’s public was actually opposed to the war. The public saw many parts of the war as inhumane and completely unnecessary. Americans were against the war in Vietnam because of the fact that it seemed as though we were getting interfering with a civil war, the U.S. army implemented draft, and the tactics used by the army were frowned upon by the public (Vietnam n. pag.) People can argue that the public was against many other wars, but never to the extent of the war in Vietnam, the public started turning on…
- 1174 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Obedience to authority is an aspect present in all societies throughout known history. For the entirety of this paper, obedience to authority will refer to any act a member of society performs that he or she was told to do by a position of higher authority. This paper will focus on the idea that members of society will follow commands that may go against their moral beliefs on the sole account that the commands come from a place of higher authority. This statement has been tested multiple times beginning with Stanley Milgram’s experiment in 1963, in which he set up a scenario that convinced people they were harming an individual they had met only minutes before through electrical…
- 1416 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
“As you can appreciate, our Army is faced with a tremendous challenge here in Vietnam. Initially our soldiers were committed strictly in an advisory role, and as such the number required was relatively small. But now it has become necessary to commit more and more US troops to actual combat. It is necessary therefore that our training programs in the United States be oriented toward the type of fighting we are involved in today in this country” (Westmoreland).…
- 1475 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The article written by Ralph R. Reiland titled Terrorism VS Individualism is about different instance where people followed the actions of different leaders. This article also spoke briefly, about how easy it was to persuade people who were unhappy with their employer, to do things that most would not.…
- 716 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays