This was not the case though, as stated in Harry Perlstadt’s “Milgram’s Obedience to Authority: Its Origins, Controversies, and Replications” there was significant harm to many of the participants in control of the electric shock. “Subjects could have suffered harm during the actual conduct of the experiment and/or experienced short- or long- term harm as a result of their participation.” (Perlstadt 62) The damage that Perstadt is referring to is not physical, he explains that many researchers who have looked over Milgram’s experiment believe that the participants could be harmed “if not through the stress of the experiment itself, then through the “infl icted insight” into their own personalities.” (Perlstadt 62) This idea is understandable to say the least. A large percentage of the world likes to believe that they are good people. At the end of this experiment the participants find out that although they did not actually harm anyone, put into the situation, they would have just because a figure of authority commanded them to do …show more content…
Understanding these concepts is essential to humankind based on the fact that if we could control these factors we could make decisions based solely on what is right and wrong, and not who tells a subject what to do. Obedience to authority has a vast variety of pros and cons. Whether it be from the psychological stress that the people being ordered are put under, or a structured society that runs smooth because of the people willing to follow any commands. Obedience to authority has been a part of every society since the beginning of time, whether it continues in our future depends on each individual and how they view the