Preview

Name and Discuss All the Seller's Obligations in Details with Regards to a Contract of Sale

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
756 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Name and Discuss All the Seller's Obligations in Details with Regards to a Contract of Sale
Contract of sale
Table of content 1. The seller’s duty to protect 2. The seller’s duty to deliver 3.1 The meaning of delivery 3.2 How delivery occurs 3. The seller’s ability for latent defects 4.3 General principles 4.4 Requirements for liability 4.5 Scope of the seller’s liability 4.6 Waiver at the time of conclusion of the agreement 4.7 Latent defects in repairs 4. The manufacture & dealer’s liability for latent defect 5. Liability on the grounds of the seller 6. The sellers liability for eviction
Introduction
A contract of sale is a legal contract and exchange of goods, services to be exchanged from seller to buyer for an agreed upon value in money paid or the promise to pay same. 1. The seller’s duty to protect

The seller’s primary obligations are to transfer ownership of the goods and deliver the goods. A seller may agree to package or label the thing in a certain way or service the thing for a specific period of time. The seller’s is obliged to take care of the thing until it is delivered. The seller must exercise the care of a reasonable person in caring for the thing in question. The seller is liable for breach of contract if the thing is destroyed through his/her intentional or negligent carelessness. The seller is liable for breach of contract if the thing is destroyed through his/her intentional or negligent carelessness. However, in the absence of an explicit term excluding risk, the purchase carries the risk of the thing being accidentally damaged while still in the possession of the seller.

If the purchase remain in breach to receive the thing, the seller can only be held liable if the thing is damaged or perishes because of his/her intention or gross negligence.

2. The seller’s duty to deliver

3.1 The seller is obliged to deliver the thing to the purchaser. Delivery of the goods shall be made by the supplier in accordance with the terms

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    LP 5.1

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages

    8. What are the general obligations of the seller and buyer in a contract governed by Article 2?…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Purchaser's exclusive remedy and the Seller's limit of liability for any and all losses or damages resulting from defective goods or from any other cause will be for the purchase price of the particular delivery with respect to which losses or damages are claimed, plus any transportation charges actually paid by the Purchaser.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    PASS 2 UNIT 3 A

    • 840 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sale of Goods act 1979 – All goods must meet the main three criteria. The goods must be as described, of satisfaction quality and fit for purpose. If the seller does not meet the criteria they are breaching the contract and the buyer will have to claim under the Sale of Good Act 1979…

    • 840 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 14 P6

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Page

    All consequences of the breach of the condition are deemed to be sufficiently serious to justify termination. The buyer cannot terminate the contract if the non-conformity is a minor defect and slight breach. Slight breach is treated as a breach of warranty in the business sales contract. Slight breach is the breach when the conse-quences of breach do not go to the root of the contract or detriment the purpose of the contract. If the buyer accepts the goods there is no right of termination because termi-nation remedy required…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kolchek Negligence Case

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages

    + Product liability based on misrepresentation because the misrepresentation is of a material fact, and the seller intended to induce the buyer’s reliance on the misrepresentation.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If the non-performing party, in its sole judgment, is prevented directly or indirectly on account of any cause beyond its control, from delivering the Goods at the time specified, then the Seller will have the right to terminate this Agreement by notice in writing to the Buyer if no remedy can be provided. The notice to Buyer will be accompanied by full refund of all sums paid by the Buyer pursuant to this Agreement and vice versa if the Buyer doesn’t perform to its obligations.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Contract and Goods

    • 8844 Words
    • 39 Pages

    7. In Exclusive Dealing Contracts, sellers have an obligation to use their best efforts to supply the goods to the buyers.…

    • 8844 Words
    • 39 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The buyer may lose the right to revoke or reject goods that are nonconforming by failing to inspect them in a timely manner. When the buyer accepted the goods, signifies to the seller or lessor in words or by conduct that the good are conforming or that the goods will be taken despite their nonconformity.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    c) The non-breaching party must return all goods received. Requests for Specific Performance • An injured party may be able to request specific performance if the other party is in breach.…

    • 1790 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Amber Pretty Exercise

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Defective products, which cause damage, can give rise to liability and this traditionally arose under the common law. However, the common law approach places the burden on the claimant to establish that the defendant owes a duty to him, was in breach of that duty and that they suffered damages as a result of that breach, and it may not always be straightforward to establish causation, especially when the defect arose on part of the manufacturer. Claims may also arise in Contract law under statutory devices, such as the Supply of Goods Act 1979, the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 and the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977.…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    law case study

    • 2210 Words
    • 7 Pages

    What are Buyer 's potential claims against Seller? What are Seller 's potential defences? Who is likely to prevail in the event this case goes to court?…

    • 2210 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    4. Payment for the Goods will be made to the Seller when the Purchaser is notified that the Goods have been delivered by the Seller to a carrier for shipment to the Purchaser or, in the alternative, when any document of title or registrable…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law: Final Exam

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages

    * The risk of loss in a shipment contract passes to the buyer or lessee when the goods are delivered to the carrier.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Sale of Goods Act

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If it is agreed to deliver in instalments and paid for separately, and either the seller makes defective deliveries, or the buyer refuses to take delivery, it would:…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Limited Protected Speech

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    121). Many states have adopted the strict liability doctrine to determine product liability cases. Under strict liability, defendants can be determined liable despite following all necessary preparations from manufacturing to sale; this concept is known as liability without fault (Cheeseman, 2013, p. 121). Therefore, all parties in the supply chain of distribution are liable for any injury caused by the product. For example, a customer purchases a new stove from a local hardware store that has an unknown heating element defect. Later, the heating element catches fire, causing significant damage to the customer’s house. If the customer lives in a jurisdiction that recognizes strict liability that customers can sue any party of the chain of distribution, including the hardware store, manufacturer, and distributor. A defendant, who is not at fault, can later sue the negligent party of the chain of distribution to recover monetary rewards paid to the…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays