Preview

The Sale of Goods Act

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
663 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Sale of Goods Act
(a) Buyer is not bound to accept delivery by instalments unless agreed.
(b) If it is agreed to deliver in instalments and paid for separately, and either the seller makes defective deliveries, or the buyer refuses to take delivery, it would:
• result in repudiation of the whole contract, or
• it would be a severable breach giving rise to a claim for damages only.
(c) It depends on the terms of the contract[s.33]
• Maple Flock Co. Ltd. v. Universal Furniture Products (Wembley) Ltd. (1934)
In Maple Flock Co. Ltd. v Universal Furniture Products, the seller agreed to deliver goods in installment and the buyer took further delivery of goods after finding one batch of goods were not upto the standard. The buyer later refused further deliveries. It was held that the buyer was not entitled to repudiate the contract as the defective goods constituted a small portion of the total quantity delivered.

2. Remedies available to the seller and the buyer

(a) Typical common law remedy is damages.
(b) If a condition is broken, innocent party is entitled to repudiate the contract and claim damages.
(c) If a warranty is broken, innocent party is only entitled to claim damages.[s.13(2)]
(d) The equitable remedies include lien, injunction, specific performance and rescission.

3. Remedies available to the seller

3.1 Personal remedies against the buyer
(a) SOGO makes specific provision to the ‘unpaid’ seller.
(b) Seller may sue for the price if the buyer wrongfully refuses to pay for the goods [s.51]
 Torvan Shipping Ltd. v. Gilman & Co. Ltd. (1977)
In Torvan shipping Ltd. v Gilman & Co. Ltd., the buyer requested to terminate the contract after accepting the first installment of goods. It was held that it was a contract for unascertained goods and as the buyer terminated the contract, the seller could not succeed in an action for the price.

(c) Seller may sue for damages for non-acceptance if the buyer wrongfully refuses to accept and pay for the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Chapter 11 Business law

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Signal Sets Company contracts to deliver one hundred 52-inch plasma high-definition television sets to a new retail customer, Tuner TV Store, on May 1, with payment to be made on delivery. Signal tenders delivery in its own truck. Tuner's manager notices that some of the cartons have scrape marks. Tuner's owner phones Signal's office and asks whether the sets might have been damaged as they were being loaded. Signal assures Tuner that the sets are in perfect condition. Tuner tenders Signal a check, which Signal refuses, claiming that the first delivery to new customers is always for cash. Tuner promises to pay the cash within two days. Signal leaves the sets with Tuner, which stores them in its warehouse pending its "Grand Opening Sale" on May 15. Two days later, Tuner's stocker opens some of the cartons and discovers that a number of the sets are damaged beyond ordinary repair. Signal claims Tuner has accepted the sets and is in breach by not paying on delivery. Will Signal succeed on these claims? Explain.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2. Does a general right of return exist for the delivered item(s) and, if so, is delivery or performance…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: Frigaliment sued B.N.S. There were two contracts that involved selling chickens. In the first contract B.N.S was in agreeance with selling 75,000 pounds of 2.5-3 pounds of chicken, to Frigaliment. 50,000 pounds of chicken at 2.5-3 pounds at a higher price were agreed in the second contract. B.N.S fulfilled the first contract with two shipments. The first shipment fell short. B.N.S made up for the short shipment in their second shipment. Frigaliment accused B.N.S of shipping the larger chicken not to their expectations. Frigaliment protested the rest of the shipments. B.N.S said that their only obligations was to ship chicken that met the requirements stated in the contract.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Purchaser's exclusive remedy and the Seller's limit of liability for any and all losses or damages resulting from defective goods or from any other cause will be for the purchase price of the particular delivery with respect to which losses or damages are claimed, plus any transportation charges actually paid by the Purchaser.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    9 2 work file 1 rs

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A. If a car cannot be repaired during the warranty period, is the defective car considered a lemon?…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 14 P6

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Page

    All consequences of the breach of the condition are deemed to be sufficiently serious to justify termination. The buyer cannot terminate the contract if the non-conformity is a minor defect and slight breach. Slight breach is treated as a breach of warranty in the business sales contract. Slight breach is the breach when the conse-quences of breach do not go to the root of the contract or detriment the purpose of the contract. If the buyer accepts the goods there is no right of termination because termi-nation remedy required…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Yea Budyy

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Revocation of acceptance. The buyer had accepted the goods but could revoke acceptance if (1) the defects substantially impaired the value of the washers; and (2) the defect was not readily discoverable until after the sales to customers occurred. [Aetna Chemical Co. v. Spaulding & Kimball Co., 126 A. 582 (Vt.)]…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The buyer may lose the right to revoke or reject goods that are nonconforming by failing to inspect them in a timely manner. When the buyer accepted the goods, signifies to the seller or lessor in words or by conduct that the good are conforming or that the goods will be taken despite their nonconformity.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the other hand the customer or the salesman could stick to the agreement made at the time of negotiation. This would create tension between both parties and legal issues could arise. Both parties would have legal grounds to…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Consignment Agreement

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Seller and Consignee do hereby agree to the terms set forth above by their signatures found below.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fsa Balance Sheet

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Evidence of Arrangement: No delivery before the contract  Product or Service has been delivered. Shipping only is not sufficient  Price is determined or determinable. No Contingency price is allowed  Seller is reasonably…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Breach of contract

    • 992 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Under the Sale of Goods Act (1979), there are strict rules that a seller/ retailer must abide by once they have entered into a contract. The goods must be as described (section 13), of satisfactory quality (section 14 [2]) and fit for purpose (section 14 [3]). Both section 13 and 14 have strict liability attached to them. The court will not investigate into the mind of the seller at the time or observe how much they tried but all they will look for is if there is a breach in the contract and if there is, the seller is liable.…

    • 992 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Sale of Goods Act, 1930

    • 19221 Words
    • 77 Pages

    chapter – 2 Introduction The Law relating to this statute was contained in the Chapter VII of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Subsequently, it was separated with the Indian Sale of Goods Bill, which received its assent on 15th, March 1930. It came into force on the 1st of July, 1930 as the Indian Sale of Goods Act, 1930. In due course, the word “Indian” was omitted by the Indian Sale of Goods (Amendment) Act, 1963 (33 of 1965)…

    • 19221 Words
    • 77 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Law on Sales

    • 229203 Words
    • 917 Pages

    (ii) Deliver the Possession, of the SUBJECT MATTER; (b) An OBLIGATION for the BUYER to: (i) Pay the PRICE.4 Both sets of obligations, are real obligations or obligations “to give,” as contrasted from personal obligations “to do” and “not to do,” and can be the proper subject of actions for specific performance.5 In contrast, obligations to do or not to do, cannot be enforced through actions for specific…

    • 229203 Words
    • 917 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Defective goods sold to consumer on advice of the provider; Section 24-(1) states that in Subject to a subsection (3) and (4), where a consumer is encouraged to acquire goods by the provider’s declaration and description of the goods and the consumer subsequently discovers that those goods are defective or different in a material particular from those declared or described, the consumer may return the goods to the…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays